H4rry
said
:
*snip 1st paragraph*
No, I haven't, so you'll have to excuse me but this brief description you gave left me confused. If you want to explain in more detail though, I'm listening.
H4rry
said
:
Yes. I own a Christmas Wand. I would not get anything from a replica Christmas Wand. That's why I would do one of the numerous Christmas events I actually missed, because then I will get something from this idea should it be implemented.
The point was that you'd get even more if new alternative versions of the old holiday items were done instead, which would thusly not only give more people more new stuff, but also not devalue the originals to a point where there is no distinctive difference in the graphical appearance.
H4rry
said
:
You keep saying it was a mistake yet I can't find anywhere where Jagex have stated that doing that event was a mistake. I did notice that they streamed the 2016 Christmas event a month before it's release on Twitch. Even though past broadcasts doesn't stretch that far back, you would think they would have noticed negative feedback and changed the event.
Good luck finding Jagex admitting anything they've done has been a mistake, especially directly; they'd rather spin it around and point out their "good intentions" instead. Kinda like just yesterday, when the OSRS team responded to the partnership backlash (~66% of people voted no to all the poll questions, so they prematurely cancelled the whole poll), instead of apologizing and admitting it was a mistake, they danced around it by trying to convince how good partnerships would be to us, and they even shamed us for focusing on the monetization aspect.
I was talking about actions, not words: if the 2016 Xmas rereleases hadn't been a mistake, Jagex would've repeated the action already, but they haven't, because it was a mistake.