Forums

Past holiday items for sale

Quick find code: 309-310-198-66015241

Sharp-shin

Sharp-shin

Posts: 41,301 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
H4rry said :
I wouldn't say that, people seemed to be happy with those items being re-released. Personally, I got them all those years ago and didn't care that they were re-released.

Curious thing, because I remember the exact opposite.


H4rry said :
We have veteran capes that you can wear to show off you accounts age. And like I said before, "replica" on the purchasable cosmetic overrides wouldn't diminish the historical value.

If you think the point was that the untradeable discontinued holiday items are about showing off account age, you completely missed it. The actual point was to be able to display having truly played the game during a specific time period, e.g. during a certain year's Christmas event.

Whenever you see an account with e.g. the Christmas wand, you know that they played during the Christmas of 2011 and that they completed the event, since they wouldn't have it otherwise. In comparison, if you see an account with any of the veteran capes, there is no way to know from the veteran cape whether they played during 2011 Christmas or not, let alone if they completed the event or not. Veteran capes only display account age, they don't say anything about when or how much you've played. In essence, they're mostly meaningless, aside from their graphical appearance.

There's also one major issue with veteran capes that further devalues their meaning: despite the official ironman mode having been released less than 5 years ago,
there are already official ironmen with veteran capes, up to and including the 15-year veteran cape
. This is because the timer that counts your account age begins to count even before you log in to the game, so you can just create an account, not log into it for years, come back and log in to claim veteran capes, despite never having logged in prior.

All in all, veteran capes are no substitute to holiday items.
"Volat Accipiter libera est; venandi sua natura est."
~Accipiter striatus

03-Jul-2019 14:29:05

Sharp-shin

Sharp-shin

Posts: 41,301 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
And regarding the "replica" wording on the replicas, already explained before why it's not distinctive: you wouldn't be able to tell from looking at the appearance of a replica and original which is which. Not to mention that it gives nothing new to the old owners, which would be possible with newer versions that look slightly different but still keep to the original design.


H4rry said :
Wasn't that the 2016 Christmas Event? Going back into the past and doing past Christmas Events? Why not just make this a feature every holiday where a player can step through a portal and complete past events and receive the rewards? (Keeping to the theme of this post each event can be unlocked through loyalty points) Then people will have "earned" it as they have done the event.

My bad, it seems I wasn't clear enough: I meant time travelling
in real life
. People who earned e.g. the Christmas wand, did so by completing the 2011 Christmas event... in 2011 Christmas. If you did the same now except that you completed it in 2019 Christmas for example, you would've earned it differently than the original owners.

If you're thinking "well why does that matter", the game is different now to what it was back then. Graphics have changed, combat system has changed, playerbase has changed, the game client has changed, the jmods have changed etc, there's literally no limit to the amount of things that have changed since the times when people originally earned their untradeable discontinued holiday items. The only way for those conditions to be the same would be by travelling back in time, in real life.


H4rry said :
That's the point of a replica.

Exactly, and that is why you cannot earn the originals the same way in a replica event as you did in the original event back then. It differs from the original.
"Volat Accipiter libera est; venandi sua natura est."
~Accipiter striatus

03-Jul-2019 14:29:12

Whatusaytome
Apr Member 2020

Whatusaytome

Posts: 5,767 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I still see zero relevance as to why knowing a person played on a Christmas is important.

There's guaranteed to be an extremely few number of people, if any at all, whom own every single holiday item ever released. This rerelease is 99%guaranteed new content for everybody.

Seem to be very determined for new content only, as if you can't accept recycling. You don't even have followers saying there's actually a need for graphical differences.

Nobody cares if they look the same or not, they didn't have the chance for items and thats it. They saw Jagex ask for the chance to rerelease old content that's been desired for over a decade, the desire and opportunity for popular old content that's never been available to them is a happy reason to say yes.

It's an extremely petty reason to vote no because you want to brag about things nobody new can ever have.

You keep saying everything about the game is new, but you don't understand that New Players, can never ever own any single past event item, and that it's not their fault they missed it. You just don't want old content brought back because of your own selfish reasons. You don't care that people have asked for this content for over a decade and finally have that chance.

If you change the items, then they arent the old items people voted for or what Jagex offered. This is about the items. A name change will suffice in saying it's not original.

Entitled troll.
Your opinions here can affect us all. Please post for the better

Stepping Stone Partyhats
Update the rules , Trade Lock Scammers

03-Jul-2019 15:18:29

H4rry
Jun Member 2022

H4rry

Posts: 75 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Sharp-shin said :
If you think the point was that the untradeable discontinued holiday items are about showing off account age, you completely missed it. The actual point was to be able to display having truly played the game during a specific time period, e.g. during a certain year's Christmas event.


What I'm suggesting isn't taking away from a player that they truly played the game during that time.

As for the ironman veteran cape thing, I never knew that and that's actually kinda funny.

Sharp-shin said :
And regarding the "replica" wording on the replicas, already explained before why it's not distinctive: you wouldn't be able to tell from looking at the appearance of a replica and original which is which. Not to mention that it gives nothing new to the old owners, which would be possible with newer versions that look slightly different but still keep to the original design.


Right click > examine > hover over cosmetic. "Replica". That's what the replicas are meant to do. They look like the original, but they are not the original.

I wouldn't say it gives nothing to the old owners because I highly doubt there are many - if not any people who have every single holiday item to ever be released.

And again, I would be all for slightly different looking ones, however, a replica of the original would be better for everyone as they are identical to the original, whilst also not the real thing.

Sharp-shin said :
My bad, it seems I wasn't clear enough: I meant time travelling in real life.


I know what you were saying, it's just a snobbish thing to say, because obviously it is impossible. What I was getting at is that it has been done before. An event where you go into the past, and you get past discontinued items as a reward. If it's been done before, it can happen again.

04-Jul-2019 03:53:58

H4rry
Jun Member 2022

H4rry

Posts: 75 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Sharp-shin said :

Exactly, and that is why you cannot earn the originals the same way in a replica event as you did in the original event back then. It differs from the original.


But that's the point! By definition a replica is "an exact copy or model of something". We're not trying to get the originals, we are trying to get a replica. Something that looks the same, but is not the original.

Sharp-shin said :

If you're thinking "well why does that matter", the game is different now to what it was back then. Graphics have changed, combat system has changed, playerbase has changed, the game client has changed, the jmods have changed etc, there's literally no limit to the amount of things that have changed since the times when people originally earned their untradeable discontinued holiday items. The only way for those conditions to be the same would be by travelling back in time, in real life.


I don't really get what you're trying to say here. If everything has changed, why can't discontinued items change too? I mean they already have as I mentioned before.

04-Jul-2019 04:06:21

Sharp-shin

Sharp-shin

Posts: 41,301 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
H4rry said :
What I'm suggesting isn't taking away from a player that they truly played the game during that time.

Depends on the suggestion: if you're looking to rerelease the discontinued holiday items (or making alternatives that only differ in name and not visually), you're going to devalue the originals and piss people off. If you're looking to add new versions of the discontinued holiday items that keep to the original design but still look distinctively different, then you're fine.


H4rry said :
Right click > examine > hover over cosmetic. "Replica". That's what the replicas are meant to do. They look like the original, but they are not the original.

So there is no distinctive difference when looking at them visually. That's an issue, because there needs to be one.


H4rry said :
I wouldn't say it gives nothing to the old owners because I highly doubt there are many - if not any people who have every single holiday item to ever be released.

I'm talking individual items: e.g. original owners of the Christmas wand would not get anything new from a replica Christmas wand that looks visually the same. In comparison, if there was an alternative version of it made instead, they'd get a new version that looks slightly different.

H4rry said :
I know what you were saying, it's just a snobbish thing to say, because obviously it is impossible. What I was getting at is that it has been done before. An event where you go into the past, and you get past discontinued items as a reward. If it's been done before, it can happen again.

Obviously the same mistake can happen more than once, if you're careless and/or don't learn from the first time. Doesn't mean that you should actively want that though, because it's human to make mistakes, but stupid not to learn from them.
"Volat Accipiter libera est; venandi sua natura est."
~Accipiter striatus

04-Jul-2019 14:31:03

Whatusaytome
Apr Member 2020

Whatusaytome

Posts: 5,767 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
We all know it's not possible to please everybody. But I'd rather please the people who want a replica of something, as harry so well put it, than I would want to please people who overly value something so small that they likely don't even use often.

Of all items that have been rereleased so far, and out of all things that could be rereleased, this is probably the least damaging set of items, and also one of the most satisfying.

People have been waiting for this chance ever since the first untradable holiday item, which every account ever made after could not possibly have. Meaning everybody since has something new to choose if they want to get or not.

Also, somebody with the original could totally have fun acting like theirs is a replica, so when a complainer like Blackwing comes along saying its fake, they can say "Hey, examine me again ;) "
Your opinions here can affect us all. Please post for the better

Stepping Stone Partyhats
Update the rules , Trade Lock Scammers

04-Jul-2019 18:12:00 - Last edited on 04-Jul-2019 18:13:08 by Whatusaytome

H4rry
Jun Member 2022

H4rry

Posts: 75 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Sharp-shin said :

if you're looking to rerelease the discontinued holiday items (or making alternatives that only differ in name and not visually), you're going to devalue the originals and piss people off. If you're looking to add new versions of the discontinued holiday items that keep to the original design but still look distinctively different, then you're fine.

Sharp-shin said :

So there is no distinctive difference when looking at them visually. That's an issue, because there needs to be one.


Well no it's not an issue. Ever seen Pawn Stars or something? They never buy replicas because it's not the real thing. Therefore it does not hold the same value of the original.

Sharp-shin said :

I'm talking individual items: e.g. original owners of the Christmas wand would not get anything new from a replica Christmas wand that looks visually the same. In comparison, if there was an alternative version of it made instead, they'd get a new version that looks slightly different.


Yes. I own a Christmas Wand. I would not get anything from a replica Christmas Wand. That's why I would do one of the numerous Christmas events I actually missed, because then I will get something from this idea should it be implemented.

Sharp-shin said :

Obviously the same mistake can happen more than once, if you're careless and/or don't learn from the first time. Doesn't mean that you should actively want that though, because it's human to make mistakes, but stupid not to learn from them.


You keep saying it was a mistake yet I can't find anywhere where Jagex have stated that doing that event was a mistake. I did notice that they streamed the 2016 Christmas event a month before it's release on Twitch. Even though past broadcasts doesn't stretch that far back, you would think they would have noticed negative feedback and changed the event.

04-Jul-2019 21:19:14

Pikachu78
Oct Member 2013

Pikachu78

Posts: 1,368 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Your right they should of changed the 2016 event to where u get the proper items for all the past events . Doing the 2011 part should of given you the wand , as you did techninally do the event, but for some odd reason they chose to exclude the rewards for doing the event the item is associated with
pikachu

06-Jul-2019 01:53:41 - Last edited on 06-Jul-2019 01:59:44 by Pikachu78

Turksta

Turksta

Posts: 3,569 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Draco Burnz said :
Whatusaytome said :
Also in regards to doing the actual event, I'd happily bump Shifu's suggestion for a portal to replay events if that's what it takes. I'd support if we could replay events for the rewards.

Edit: it appears that Shifu's suggestion for a portal to replay the events has exceeded page 50. So no longer exists for us to bump. Shame... it was a nice thread..

I'd happily remake it if it's something more people would rather happen personally I think if they polled replaying the events for the rewards, less people would be inclined to say no, and would pass even a 75% poll.


Nah, if you choose to miss events when they're officially released, you still lose all rights to owning the rewards.



So what makes you think this would?
I've lost my original quote. but idk how many more times do i have to say this. People don't "choose" to miss out on events, they have no option in the first place. This must be like the 10th time maybe i've said this. These posts just come off as condescending too according to a fmod from a similar argument from a few years back.

06-Jul-2019 09:48:16

Quick find code: 309-310-198-66015241 Back to Top