Forums

Alt1 should be banned! Y/N?

Quick find code: 185-186-147-66227242

SlR
Nov Member 2020

SlR

Posts: 4,378 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Wet Bedding said :
SlR said :
My suggestion: Ban Alt1, or more specifically the puzzle solver within it, please



^ Alt1 in use ^ is this cheating?


It's similar to how Chess cheats work, it sits on-top of your client and you can click 'through' it, like digital tracing paper. Is this fair play? In the Chess world, this technology is considered hard-cheating.


thats great you enjoy the challenge of chess duals and what not... but this is runescape, and we get way to many clue scrolls to not need an overlay. Like you said, you used it yourself, so if you want to ban people for it you gotta throw yourself in the pit too, along with most of the jagex team.


I don't play chess (at least not regularly). It was just a comment somebody else made, and I thought they made a good point! I've personally never used Alt1, so I don't know where that came from.

I wouldn't suggest banning people that currently use it, I don't think that would be fair, as it needs to be 'acknowledged' as a cheat first.

Third-party software / technology that automates gameplay does not belong in RS. It degrades RS for self-gain. It doesn't offer anything 'positive' to the community. It just makes the game easier for those that use it (through use of AI); bypassing in-game mechanics (that ordinary players are expected to use). Automating gameplay (cognitive / processing) with clickable on-screen indicators, and skipping what would otherwise be a 2m fee (skip tickets) doesn't feel right.

"So and so does it / uses it, so it must be ok" are not wise words to follow (imo). Runescape is known for its bots and scammers, unfortunately. If you care about your items or your account, don't risk it, don't download open-source software for RS (that alters your client / where you log in from) if it isn't supported / listed on Runescape's official platforms.
Bob says:
A bank PIN will keep your items secure.
Always check the second trade screen.
Never trade in the Wilderness!
Keep your computer keylogger-free and virus scanned.
Never give your password out to anyone.

12-Nov-2021 11:20:09 - Last edited on 24-Dec-2021 08:04:08 by SlR

Dulcis Nex
Dec Member 2021

Dulcis Nex

Posts: 2,216 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Its objectively cheating and users should recieve bans as they do for other third party programs.

Jagex have willfully turned a blind eye, I believe there even was a tweet saying users wouldn't be banned for it or that a jmod used it themselves or something.

Nobody "needs" an overlay or any sort of help, you just suck too much to do an easy task in which case you don't deserve the reward. That said only the puzzle solver or anything reactive is cheating, static answers are not.
You'll get it when you deserve it.

24-Dec-2021 00:14:43

Draco Burnz
Dec Member 2011

Draco Burnz

Posts: 79,296 Emerald Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Dulcis Nex said :
Its objectively cheating and users should recieve bans as they do for other third party programs.



Yet if jagex is ok with ppl using 3PC, then it makes 0 sense for them not to be ok with this for rs3.

So until they change their mind on one, i dont see the other happening.

Dulcis Nex said :


Nobody "needs" an overlay or any sort of help, you just suck too much to do an easy task in which case you don't deserve the reward. That said only the puzzle solver or anything reactive is cheating, static answers are not.


Just like no one "needs" the wiki, yet that still ok to use despite it also being 3rd party.

Same with google auth, jagex is of course ok with that yet jagex doesnt own it.
Draco Burnz
Anime Fanatic
Defender of the logical

24-Dec-2021 00:52:03

Adarajin
Jan Member 2005

Adarajin

Posts: 14,238 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Haven't read the entire thread (it's late and I need to be getting to bed) but I think the real question is enforcement... if it isn't triggering the anti-cheating stuff, what's to prove that it's the program and not just a player that happens to be uncommonly quick at solving puzzles? We already have enough problems with the occasional false-ban (I know of one player that I believe has....4+?....macroing bans that have been quashed because he was able to prove that he actually is that efficient at playing) and that's where the software has a good chance at detecting the difference.

Please don't think that I support Alt1 - I'm entirely against it, and not just because it's a security risk to players accounts. I believe that Jagex needs to open up their own client to the extent that they allow modding tools (within carefully designed limits) so that a lot of the tools that these other programs add that Jagex is unwilling/unable to implement that would not give unfair advantage, can be utilized by everyone.

Anyways, again, I am firmly against the program, but I am feeling realistic tonight as to what is likely to happen :-(
Things may be looking down now, but I see a light at the end of the tunnel;
Do you think I should get off the tracks?

24-Dec-2021 06:52:34

Rikornak
Oct Member 2013

Rikornak

Posts: 9,169 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Adarajin said :
Haven't read the entire thread (it's late and I need to be getting to bed) but I think the real question is enforcement... if it isn't triggering the anti-cheating stuff, what's to prove that it's the program and not just a player that happens to be uncommonly quick at solving puzzles? We already have enough problems with the occasional false-ban (I know of one player that I believe has....4+?....macroing bans that have been quashed because he was able to prove that he actually is that efficient at playing) and that's where the software has a good chance at detecting the difference.

Please don't think that I support Alt1 - I'm entirely against it, and not just because it's a security risk to players accounts. I believe that Jagex needs to open up their own client to the extent that they allow modding tools (within carefully designed limits) so that a lot of the tools that these other programs add that Jagex is unwilling/unable to implement that would not give unfair advantage, can be utilized by everyone.

Anyways, again, I am firmly against the program, but I am feeling realistic tonight as to what is likely to happen :-(


That is actually something I really could more then second. A dedicated interface for modding.

It never should be a situation like in OS in which the community entirely depends on 3rd party producers to develop a client that is more than barely useable - but if they can provide ideas it actually could also be a nudge for jagex, where they can put in more work for their game. And well - obviously niche interest also could be covered without jagex having to bother about them at all.
Improvements: Tooltip / (F2P) QoL v2
Quick Fixes: Invention

24-Dec-2021 07:02:33 - Last edited on 24-Dec-2021 07:06:23 by Rikornak

Dulcis Nex
Dec Member 2021

Dulcis Nex

Posts: 2,216 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Draco Burnz said :
Just like no one "needs" the wiki, yet that still ok to use despite it also being 3rd party.

Same with google auth, jagex is of course ok with that yet jagex doesnt own it.
Wiki is a webpage my dude. I'm not even going to justify responding to google auth.
You'll get it when you deserve it.

25-Dec-2021 02:35:03

Draco Burnz
Dec Member 2011

Draco Burnz

Posts: 79,296 Emerald Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Dulcis Nex said :
Wiki is a webpage my dude. I'm not even going to justify responding to google auth.


Ok and your point is?

Both are still 3PP, 3rd party programs, yet you're wanting them to say no to one but yes to others.

Sorry, it doesnt work like that.
Draco Burnz
Anime Fanatic
Defender of the logical

25-Dec-2021 06:55:30 - Last edited on 25-Dec-2021 06:56:57 by Draco Burnz

Kings Abbot

Kings Abbot

Posts: 10,747 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Draco Burnz said :
Dulcis Nex said :
Wiki is a webpage my dude. I'm not even going to justify responding to google auth.


Both are still 3PP, 3rd party programs,


Since when is a webpage a program?

I see the Wiki, which is just an encylopedia, as completely different as Alt1 that interprets the game for you and shows you an exact, real-time solution. Alt1 completely bypasses your brain, so who is actually playing then?
Kings Eastwood in
THE GLOOP , THE BWIAN , and THE WIKI
music by Trewavio Morricone

YOU-KNOW-WHO
,
GO
YOU-KNOW-WHAT
YOURSELF!

25-Dec-2021 10:13:26

Draco Burnz
Dec Member 2011

Draco Burnz

Posts: 79,296 Emerald Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Kings Abbot said :

I see the Wiki, which is just an encylopedia, as completely different as Alt1 that interprets the game for you and shows you an exact, real-time solution. Alt1 completely bypasses your brain, so who is actually playing then?


You are as the player still needs to input commands just as much as you have to for using wiki.

So if jagex is ok with authorizing a 3PS, 3rd party site, like wiki, then i dont see how they can go back on their word and choose not to be for another.
Draco Burnz
Anime Fanatic
Defender of the logical

25-Dec-2021 13:58:42

Dulcis Nex
Dec Member 2021

Dulcis Nex

Posts: 2,216 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Draco Burnz said :
Ok and your point is?

Both are still 3PP, 3rd party programs, yet you're wanting them to say no to one but yes to others.

Sorry, it doesnt work like that.
Well that the wiki isn't a program to begin with, so no its not.

Google are Jagex's partners providing security for their accounts, how you can try to compare that to shady programs not made, supported or partnered by Jagex designed to give players an advantage in violation of ToS is beyond me.
You'll get it when you deserve it.

25-Dec-2021 14:50:51

Quick find code: 185-186-147-66227242 Back to Top