forums.rs

Forums

Bounty Hunter Target System

Quick find code: 380-381-64-65440134

of 54
I Skulled I
Jan Member 2024

I Skulled I

Posts: 118 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
This is the exact bounty hunter WE JUST VOTED AGAISNT???


You cant just re-poll the same exact bounty hunter over and over UNTIL THE VOTE PASSES.....

Theres nothing different. Target system in the wildy+pvp with NO ADDED LOOTS.

So i can basically be assigned a target thats ONE ITEMING and kill him for a dds...? But wait, i can already do that in pvp? Theres enough one itemers there, as well as the wilderness...
SO WHY THE HELL WOULD I PARTICIPATE IN THIS "BOUNTY HUNTER" MECHANISM IF THERE IS NO REAL BOUNTY WORTH CHASING AFTER???

OH AND...... who the hell wants "cosmetic rewards"????? NOBODY.


NO TO BOUNTY HUNTER ONCE AGAIN.

REMOVE PVP AND ADD BH CRATER.

30-Jul-2014 22:08:11 - Last edited on 30-Jul-2014 22:09:06 by I Skulled I

[#9MTTBZM1X]

[#9MTTBZM1X]

Posts: 1 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Think it's a bad idea where your target doesn't know you are their target, would be much better if you were both each-others targets.

Why don't you also poll PVP armour/weapons alongside as a separate question? Such as 'If Bounty Hunter Target System passes the poll, would you like the inclusion of PVP armour/weapons?'?

Is a good idea to give people the choice to voice their opinions fully.

30-Jul-2014 22:10:30

Oblv XB

Oblv XB

Posts: 4,956 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
[#9MTTBZM1X] said :
Think it's a bad idea where your target doesn't know you are their target, would be much better if you were both each-others targets.

Why don't you also poll PVP armour/weapons alongside as a separate question? Such as 'If Bounty Hunter Target System passes the poll, would you like the inclusion of PVP armour/weapons?'?

Is a good idea to give people the choice to voice their opinions fully.

because the rest of the community would vote no because they think they're more overpowered than the AGS and would be used to PvM with.. sigh. i hate the pvm * skiller communities.
UNBAN 3RD AGE MAGE.
BRING BACK JACK!

30-Jul-2014 22:13:47

MostIy Baked

MostIy Baked

Posts: 29 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
LordSith_666 said :
Lil brazy said :
MostIy Baked said :
Will still vote NO to this, and I'm surprised you spent all this time creating this dev blog when the poll failed. No, we do not want country hunter. the people who voted for it probably don't pk and wanted to try it once, **** someone off, then go back to clicking on trees for days on end. Pkers already have a problem being spread out so far, from 1v1 pking to small teams to clans, you are constantly world hopping looking for people wether it is in the wilderness, edgeville, or the diluted pvp worlds.


If you really want to fix pvp, fix pvp worlds. The fact that at 63 combat i can get rushed by a level 79 maxed out pure is utterly ridiculous. Im 80 ranged on my pure, nothing else, and I'm fighting gods. The same for my main here, I'm 103 combat fighting nearly maxed mains when i only have one combat stats over 90. Fix them to be like lower level wilderness idk mates get creative. I love the game and though I'm not for all these updates i do think you RE DOING A GOOD JOB HANDLING THEM and their impact on our game but please for a second consider the piers before you go introducing a pointless system thats only benefit is... cosmetics?? really?!? thats the other half of your gaming audience jagex, piers play because this game has the most competitive pvp environment to offer, not because they want a pink crown or something.

+1

thats your own damn fault for attempting to pk on an unfinished pure or max account. Not our or their problem. Matter of fact, people like you create this unesscary problem. GTFO! and finish your combat training, then go pk. Gosh, l2p*



The fact that you got offensive and angry at my post which did nothing but state a point of view about a BROKEN game mechanic, proves without a doubt, that my post was TRUE in its assumption that pvmers/skillers will vote for this just to 'rag' pkers. Rude

30-Jul-2014 22:14:44

Dodg3z

Dodg3z

Posts: 3 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Kudos for Jagex trying to do the impossible in an MMO which is balancing PVP and PVE (pvm). I would just like to quickly get my opinion out that there needs to be some sort of reward to risking more in the wild. At the moment, the wild is filled with too many people risking almost nothing and I think BH is a very good way to change that. Also, I see that the revised version is from a "PVE'er" aspect. If a Runescape player is mainly a pker and does almost nothing else, why shouldn't pking be able to make him money? With the cost of potions, food, and other tangibles it seems that pk'ing tends to break even (my kill/death is around 2-3 and still I break even).
I would also like to add that if we were to receive compensation via sharks, pots, etc. this would encourage people to pk. Now if you're saying that would disregard the time people put into working up those stats I think that statement is over-regarded in the fact that those stats are mainly "afk-able".
What about adding a store like NMZ except the rewards would be "raw" materials used to help train stats (raw sharks, herb boxes, points to imbue different items)? Therefore in theory, the supply and demand ratio will stay somewhat the same except that skillers will prosper from having high cooking/herblore.

30-Jul-2014 22:15:10 - Last edited on 30-Jul-2014 22:17:24 by Dodg3z

Tru Khaoz

Tru Khaoz

Posts: 344 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
[#9MTTBZM1X] said :
Think it's a bad idea where your target doesn't know you are their target, would be much better if you were both each-others targets.

Why don't you also poll PVP armour/weapons alongside as a separate question? Such as 'If Bounty Hunter Target System passes the poll, would you like the inclusion of PVP armour/weapons?'?

Is a good idea to give people the choice to voice their opinions fully.

PVP armor/weapons don't need to be polled, they need to be added straight into the game without a poll. There are too many people that don't understand what they're doing when they vote no on things like that.

30-Jul-2014 22:17:10

Keslir
Jul Member 2023

Keslir

Posts: 3,761 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Tru Khaoz said :
[#9MTTBZM1X] said :
Think it's a bad idea where your target doesn't know you are their target, would be much better if you were both each-others targets.

Why don't you also poll PVP armour/weapons alongside as a separate question? Such as 'If Bounty Hunter Target System passes the poll, would you like the inclusion of PVP armour/weapons?'?

Is a good idea to give people the choice to voice their opinions fully.

PVP armor/weapons don't need to be polled, they need to be added straight into the game without a poll. There are too many people that don't understand what they're doing when they vote no on things like that.

Allowing jagex to add things into game without poll agreement from the players is strictly idiotic. Remember what happened last time we allowed them to do that? They ruined Rs3 with no wilderness or free trade. We are a community and we vote on everything now, that's the only way to move on. If we become our own demise than we have no one to blame but ourselves.

30-Jul-2014 22:19:59

Crystalis

Crystalis

Posts: 2,111 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Crystalis said :
Mod Reach said :
Unfortunately, as the blog indicates, if we introduce statuettes that arbitrarily drop when killing other players, we lead to a hyper-inflated market which leads to the rapid descent of various areas of the game - Something we want to strictly avoid.


My argument for adding additional incentives is not to add the statuettes, Jesus there can be other things added and the statues can actually be modified as well.


You say that adding extra incentives like skiller items will crash economy. Well lets say it's true, Why haven't you removed pure essence and vials of waters and red spider eggs from Nightmare Zone yet?


Vials of water used to be 300-400 gp, now they are 5-10 gp. Crashed? YUP.

Snape grass used to be 300-400 gp as well, now they are 100-150 gp at best.

Pure essence peaked at 80-120 gold, now it's barely 40-45 gp.


Well lets not be hypocrites, don't say one thing is bad for economy then allow the same exact thing to exist in different content.



Now onto the point, your job to make sure people don't boost kills and abuse the system. If you don't want people farming easy resources, that's your problem but give us what we want! Not cosmetics, not some pathetic target system.. actual extra incentives that makes us want to go out and kill people for profit.

30-Jul-2014 22:26:54

Tru Khaoz

Tru Khaoz

Posts: 344 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Keslir said :
Tru Khaoz said :
[#9MTTBZM1X] said :
Think it's a bad idea where your target doesn't know you are their target, would be much better if you were both each-others targets.

Why don't you also poll PVP armour/weapons alongside as a separate question? Such as 'If Bounty Hunter Target System passes the poll, would you like the inclusion of PVP armour/weapons?'?

Is a good idea to give people the choice to voice their opinions fully.

PVP armor/weapons don't need to be polled, they need to be added straight into the game without a poll. There are too many people that don't understand what they're doing when they vote no on things like that.

Allowing jagex to add things into game without poll agreement from the players is strictly idiotic. Remember what happened last time we allowed them to do that? They ruined Rs3 with no wilderness or free trade. We are a community and we vote on everything now, that's the only way to move on. If we become our own demise than we have no one to blame but ourselves.

I'm not talking about for everything, and it's strictly idiotic for you to assume that I am. The only way this game can move forward is for Jagex to stop listening to people like you that don't know what they're talking about.

30-Jul-2014 22:28:06

Quick find code: 380-381-64-65440134 Back to Top