One suggestion I want to make to improve your polling system:
It makes little sense to require that the removal of existing content require 75% to be removed. This is because if something passes with 75% support, but is found to be ruining the game (Nightmare Zone??), support for that content may well drop to 50%, but it still won't be removed or modified accordingly because you require 75% even when it comes to reversing changes that a previously held majority voted for. This is just not practical because regardless of how bad an update turns out to be, support will never drop from 75%+ all the way down to the 24% or less required to remove it.
I am proposing that when it comes to REMOVING content or REVERSING an update, any questions of that nature be re-worded to "Should ______ REMAIN in the game?" And if it doesn't get 75% support, it is removed or modified.
Primary examples of this are Nightmare Zone, which should have been nerfed long long ago. And of course the Wilderness Ditch, which made it into the game without a poll yet is unwanted by around 70% of the player-base. It never would have passed in a million years.
Long live the Wilderness. Long live risk vs reward in PVM. Long live 2006.
26-Jan-2017 19:45:06
- Last edited on
26-Jan-2017 19:49:51
by
Reminiscon