Original message details are unavailable.
AFKing was against the rules in 07 and back then you would be treated the same as a botter would. Your lack of knowledge of business is astounding when you say splashing didn't affect nat prices let me break down nat history on 07.
Nats were 300gp and steady there was huge demand for them and everything was going well. Then NMZ comes in and turns out to have completely broken exp rates especially for mage and people were abusing the hell out of it and nats weren't needed in business terms there was serious lack of demand and they dropped to 250 each and a 50gp drop in items that are bought in bulk is a huge loss and a serious hit to the rcing skill. Time goes on and the damage had been done nats were starting to stabilize at around 235-240 and then splashing comes around
Goodie, I was waiting for a response like this.
So what changed the nature prices in the other version? They were 210 ea for the longest time and very few people splashed there, and there was no NMZ.
Almost all items decrease in price over time. The fact you're using 300gp natures as an example is redundant, as they were only like this at the very start of the game.
"a serious hit to the RC skill", wrong again. Nats have gotten cheaper but so has pure essence. In fact let's use an example of just over a year ago. Nats were 220ish each and pure essence 80-100 each and look at yesterday, nats were 210-220 each and pure essence is 25 each. Did anyone complain about rcing nat profit then? No.
There's been almost no diffence in the profit of rcing nats so this argument that splashing is going to suddenly make rc a lot more profitable is crazy. Of course nat prices will probably increase 20ish gp or so, but from some of the responses on this thread you're making it sound like rcing nats (esp at 91) wasn't very profitable. With ess being now 25 gp, it's very profitable still, even with splashing.
Plus no-one ever got banned for "afking" in 2007.
28-Nov-2014 03:34:12