Chief Elf
said
:
I think that, as evidenced and proven on this thread, Forum Moderators do deliberate on their own when it comes to cases here on the Forums. As I am sure that you are aware, they have their own private sub-forums that may be used for discussions regarding their duties and whatnot. As an addendum, we also have Social Media so that makes it easier for everyone to communicate among themselves.
When I said "seasoned" FMods, I meant to refer to those FMods that have been here for almost
20 years
on the team. As far as I can remember, Tuffty and Tren are the two oldest and when my idea came afloat, I suggested that they should be the ones with seniority when it related to reviewing other FMods' actions; however, I agreed on the fact that the suggestion wouldn't have worked due to conflicts, issues, feelings, etc. It's hard to have an FMod review another FMod's action without subjectivity. We'd love for the process to be objective, but if FMods did review one another, it'd be extremely hard to keep subjectivity out of the equation. Personally, I wouldn't agree with a process where FMods are involved in reviewing their own actions. It just doesn't make sense. The cons outweigh the pros, if any.
I enjoy good communication Throughout the history of the RSOFs, specifically when Mod Poppy was in charge, she always mentioned that education goes a long way in teaching someone how to learn something and how not to make the same mistake again. For example, if someone posts in the wrong sub-forum, it'd be ideal to help the person first and then educate them on the fact that their thread would have been better suited somewhere else for better reception. For me, this is all about communication and I do think that I commended Mod Kari's responses in FMR within a thread that was posted here once.
03-Nov-2021 14:07:26
- Last edited on
03-Nov-2021 14:10:33
by
Mrs Ana