Dilbert2001
said
:
There are many ways to "look after" FMR though. They can just look and take actions behind the scene without replying to FMR. They can send replies to our message boxes instead, if applicable. That will be on par with the moderation of most social media like Reddit.
Obviously; however, even if a private message is sent, the J-Mod in question posts a public response letting the specific player and everyone else know that they have been sent an inbox message:
"If appropriate, you may receive a follow up in-game inbox message when you submit a report, so check your game message centre regularly. Otherwise you can expect a public response to your concerns in a post at the end of this thread."
Coincidentally, here's an example of Mod Kalaya publicly saying that she was going to send Archaeox an inbox regarding his concern(s):
The ability to send private messages to our individual Message Centre inboxes has always been there and this is used whenever the J-Mod in question deems it appropriate; however, when this occurs, the J-Mod in question publicly informs everyone that a certain player would be privately contacted. This makes sense and it's appreciated because it shows transparency and that the reports and/or concerns are being adequately heard and taken care of.
Mrs Ana
said
:
This makes sense and it's appreciated because it shows transparency
and that the reports and/or concerns are being adequately heard and taken care of
.
This. Totally.
It is not just competence that is required, but the appearance of competence. It should be obvious that player perception is as important as what is actually being done.
[Edit to add: Obvious because managing perceptions is a major part of community management anywhere, or should be.]
~~~~ Just another victim of the ambient morality ~~~~
was in regards to the former Who Are You thread in OT that was a sticky. Was a pointless thread years before that one was made and was pointless then.
Took a while before a jmod agreed and removed it. As it was made a sticky by a fmod for no other reason than it might be good for the community I often used it as an example when certain fmods claimed they were not allowed to make threads stickies without permission.
The best was when Tuffty locked another thread in OT for asking personal security questions (favourite band I believe) he then listed a bunch of other questions you're not allowed to ask.
Naturally I cross referenced with the Who Are You thread and unsurprisingly a handful of those same questions we're not allowed to ask were listed there. On a thread that had well over 1k replies in x number of years. Oh how I chuckled going to FMR, sorry Tuffty your locked thread was un locked
Eventually I convinced Mod Meadows to remove it when he was on his forum overhaul spree.
I can rememeber that report from x years ago yet some people can't remember what they posted 2 month ago...
I've also received inbox messages as well once was after requesting further clarification.
29-Oct-2021 20:12:56
- Last edited on
29-Oct-2021 23:19:09
by
Wilf
Naturally I cross referenced with the Who Are You thread and unsurprisingly a handful of those same questions we're not allowed to ask were listed there. On a thread that had well over 1k replies in x number of years. Oh how I chuckled going to FMR, sorry Tuffty your locked thread was un locked
Thats why the F-Mods like the review thread so much. We need to be accountable to Jagex as well as to the Community. So it has to stay and work well.
Also no hard feelings. These things happen and I hold no grudges at all and never will.
If jmod would PM players in their message center when they respond to their fmr post and say in the fmr thread simply to each player that qualified "X Player name, I have responded to your FMR post. See your inbox." then we could keep the posts auto hidden and let jmods keep whatever action is taken private.
Jeremy Cheng
said
:
If jmod would PM players in their message center when they respond to their fmr post and say in the fmr thread simply to each player that qualified "X Player name, I have responded to your FMR post. See your inbox." then we could keep the posts auto hidden and let jmods keep whatever action is taken private.
If appropriate, you may receive a follow up in-game inbox message when you submit a report, so check your game message centre regularly. Otherwise you can expect a public response to your concerns in a post at the end of this thread.
Thats how Inbox messages work. I can't see Jagex sending out Inbox messages to everyone using review. It just won't happen. It's hard enough to get a review actioned within a few days.
Hopefully now Mod Kari has handed it over to 2 Staff Members it might help out the issue at hand.
Since we’re on the topic of new proposals, can I suggest something quite wild? It essentially removes the advantage of having third-party impartiality, but I wonder if you guys would like to entertain this for a while.
How do you guys feel.. about Fmods moderating each other? Essentially, if an Fmod’s actions gets reported, the Fmod team as a whole can deliberate (in their forums) on the best response.
I understand that it doesn’t do anything to address a power imbalance between moderators and the community, but the reason for this suggestion is because a lot of the time, there might just have been a misunderstanding from either parties relevant to a case. A lot of the times, I would’ve preferred to engage with the forum mod, or even their team in general, and discuss a better way of conducting/presenting my threads/posts moving forward.
It would be really lovely to receive a response from an Fmod like “We’re hearing what you say, and we’ll take it into consideration …. Hey [ ], we’ve had a thought about what you said and we believe that the best course of action is ….. for x y z reasons.” I think everyone can appreciate some open communication. The Fmods can even give suggestions like, “While I don’t think x y z is appropriate.. I think what you would be able to do is ….”
Another reason for the suggestion is that the Fmods have been here longer than the current CM, so they have an understanding of the community.
Naturally, there are disadvantages to this suggestion, but I thought I’d put the idea out there and see how everyone feels about it. Of course this suggestion is just to address the lack of manpower tending to the forums and ultimately, Jmods have the final say.
^^
Yes, it seems natural for FMods to provide feedback or discuss moderation with the team where appropriate. I've only ever seen 1 FMod post to FMR (for whatever reason), which leads me to think they have internal issue/resolution channels. I doubt they're allowed to weigh in on this though. Just thinking it might be something they're already doing. But perhaps we'll never know
Life is like a camera: Just
focus
on what's important,
capture
the good times,
develop
from the negatives, and if things don't work out,
take another shot
!
Chief Elf
said
:
.
We sort of do this now with Forum Help thread.
Need an explanation or clarification?
- If you don't understand the action that was taken or not taken, you can ask for an explanation or clarification. Depending on the time and context, this will be done as promptly as it can be, but please
be patient
.
However, you can only do this
once per issue
, if you continue to post, this will be considered
a misuse of this thread
.
It's often used when someone is confused with the actions of a F-Mod. If and I say IF the question posted is not flaming a F-Mod then a reply outlining the issue and result should be posted by the F-Mod who caught the report/question to help out.
Now if the issue/report needs further attention then it will be brought to said F-Mods notice in 2 places so they get to know 1 way or ther other that something needs addressing. That happens now. On a very rare and I mean RARE occurrence a F-Mod will and have reversed another F-Mods actions and alerted said F-Mod of whats transpired. Remember this is VERY rareley done. Then we let the F-Mod know whats happend.
Chief Elf
said
:
I remember one time that I suggested something similar to what you are stating here. Basically, the FMods who have been on the team the longest would serve as ambassadors when the action of another, newer FMod comes into question. Now, you have to ask: who will moderate those ambassadors? I'm assuming the CMs or Jagex themselves; however, I think most FMods, if not all, didn't like the idea and to be honest, I agreed and still agree with that.
I posted a thread --
Forum Help V2.: Communication
-- back in June of this year suggesting that FMods should be more communicative when it comes to reports made to Forum Help. The idea wasn't well received so I decided to edit out the contents of the thread and ask for a lock. I do believe though that Archaeox's post in that thread made so much sense.
However, I still think that some sort of a better communication method would help. I understand that they are not required to respond, but communication is key. If a regular player is allowed to ask for further clarifications, wouldn't it be easier to simply clarify in the beginning rather than having the player go back to Forum Help to ask the question? For example, there are times that posts get hidden with no action, for whatever reason. If the FMod in question would say, "Hey, xxxx, your post was hidden and forwarded to CM Nick for further consideration. Please me patient."
Or, something like, "Hey, xxxx, your post was hidden because no action was required from FMods. If you disagree, you are more than welcome to use FMR." As we all know, no matter what the response from FMods is, the player in question is still most likely going to use FMR anyway. So, if this is the case, wouldn't it be easier to see that the FMods are actually reading and responding to your concerns in Forum Help if the reports merits a direct response from the team?
This is how I see it.
02-Nov-2021 13:47:31
- Last edited on
02-Nov-2021 17:28:03
by
Mrs Ana