Forums
Let's talk about Elon Musk!
Quick find code: 23-24-842-66266218
Archaeox
said
:
Tenebri said :
it does seem to be the case
As shown by his anti-union actions at Tesla.
i was literally about to find this!!!!!
Tenebri said :
it does seem to be the case
As shown by his anti-union actions at Tesla.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/03/25/tesla-nlrb-ruling/
i was literally about to find this!!!!!
200m all RS3 on 7/3/19
1.2Billion overall Slayer xp / Ultimate slayer title
OSRS 2277/2277 Untrim slayer cape
Hail Satan,
He loves for who you are.
17-Nov-2022 19:00:19
Tenebri
said
:
your bias is showing
i cant see how anyone can try and defend what he is doing. let alone see it something positive.
he wants to work people to the bone so they cant have a life. come on man
just because it has worked (using that term loosely btw) doesnt mean its good. there are many situations in past where people have got work done and well. but was not great overall experience
all he is doing is showing a lack of compassion for the people that work for him, and a lack of gratitude. doesnt see them as human with lives. but workers thats it. that should not be encouraged or praised or defended
Hence why I wanted my bias to be front and center so you can call me on it
I guess there were two parts to my post. The first part about demanding more out of Twitter employees etc I'm not defending. If it intrudes on a good work life balance then I'm against it. Even if people could work the amount that he's asking, it isn't sustainable for anybody in the long term. He seems to do it himself but he's admitted that he's stretched and at max capacity and that really can't last.
The second part which was about the leaked email - That I saw little to no problem with. The overall point there was, as companies age and grow, so do the number of meetings (often times pointless) and red tape. That was pointers directed at those things which make total sense.
You should only be in meetings if you're actively participating or need to be in them and employees shouldn't be penalized for leaving a meeting part way through if they feel as though it's not worth them being there. Without attention it's so easy to be bogged down in meetings that you yourself really have no part or point being in.
Another thing mentioned was taking the shortest possible route when it comes to communication and getting stuff done, limiting chain of command type scenarios, which can also make sense, providing its structured.
Need support? Support Centre | Forum Help
your bias is showing
i cant see how anyone can try and defend what he is doing. let alone see it something positive.
he wants to work people to the bone so they cant have a life. come on man
just because it has worked (using that term loosely btw) doesnt mean its good. there are many situations in past where people have got work done and well. but was not great overall experience
all he is doing is showing a lack of compassion for the people that work for him, and a lack of gratitude. doesnt see them as human with lives. but workers thats it. that should not be encouraged or praised or defended
Hence why I wanted my bias to be front and center so you can call me on it
I guess there were two parts to my post. The first part about demanding more out of Twitter employees etc I'm not defending. If it intrudes on a good work life balance then I'm against it. Even if people could work the amount that he's asking, it isn't sustainable for anybody in the long term. He seems to do it himself but he's admitted that he's stretched and at max capacity and that really can't last.
The second part which was about the leaked email - That I saw little to no problem with. The overall point there was, as companies age and grow, so do the number of meetings (often times pointless) and red tape. That was pointers directed at those things which make total sense.
You should only be in meetings if you're actively participating or need to be in them and employees shouldn't be penalized for leaving a meeting part way through if they feel as though it's not worth them being there. Without attention it's so easy to be bogged down in meetings that you yourself really have no part or point being in.
Another thing mentioned was taking the shortest possible route when it comes to communication and getting stuff done, limiting chain of command type scenarios, which can also make sense, providing its structured.
Joel
Need support? Support Centre | Forum Help
17-Nov-2022 19:21:52
Quick find code: 23-24-842-66266218 Back to Top