Forums
Comp Cape Rework Dev Update
Quick find code: 16-17-615-66089258
Rikornak
said
:
...And well there was a consensus between compers and non-compers to add fitting stuff - either eventually or instantly. But there was also a fairly large portion of compers who disagreed about that - and I think to remain fair to them keeping the existing solution as legacy comp is a nice compromise.
To go full circle, since neither of the capes is a subset of the other: If you want a cape which doesn't need much maintenance once earned - aim for legacy, if you want to stay up to date - aim for any of the new ones. How much you want to put in for maintenance depends on the amount of prestige you want to achieve. And this said I am fairly sure that t2 comp will be more prestigious than legacy comp and t3 more than trimmed legacy.
For all your writing, you're thinking wrong - It's more a Venn diagrams than Natural Numbers being strict Subsets of Integers. If both sets are subsets of each other, then by definition, They Are The Same Set.
As the comp covers more than just combat, It Is Impossible for it ever to be a subset of each of the 3 capes with 3 tiers. There will be overlap for comp/(t) cape, and the 3 capes with their 3 tiers.
There is zero reason why, the Combat cape couldn't entirely be a subset of a comp/(t) cape - much the same way Natural numbers are a subset of Integers. Comp(t) is irrational, and IFB is complex
You have not addressed adding more requirements to the comp cape, nor have you addressed a combat/PVM cape. Which is what the poll actually reads. If you're trying to combine results in the poll you stated, you'd need to know the sample populations of both. Stats has rules on how you can combine data and look at it. Also, your "sizable" is much less than a majority - it's a minority.
Anyway, the polls actually show:
More support for adding in 1 cape, less than comp; easier to maintain.
Adding in requirements with a grace period.
Removing outdated requirements. My Threads:
Starting Player Owned Ports-v2
...And well there was a consensus between compers and non-compers to add fitting stuff - either eventually or instantly. But there was also a fairly large portion of compers who disagreed about that - and I think to remain fair to them keeping the existing solution as legacy comp is a nice compromise.
To go full circle, since neither of the capes is a subset of the other: If you want a cape which doesn't need much maintenance once earned - aim for legacy, if you want to stay up to date - aim for any of the new ones. How much you want to put in for maintenance depends on the amount of prestige you want to achieve. And this said I am fairly sure that t2 comp will be more prestigious than legacy comp and t3 more than trimmed legacy.
For all your writing, you're thinking wrong - It's more a Venn diagrams than Natural Numbers being strict Subsets of Integers. If both sets are subsets of each other, then by definition, They Are The Same Set.
As the comp covers more than just combat, It Is Impossible for it ever to be a subset of each of the 3 capes with 3 tiers. There will be overlap for comp/(t) cape, and the 3 capes with their 3 tiers.
There is zero reason why, the Combat cape couldn't entirely be a subset of a comp/(t) cape - much the same way Natural numbers are a subset of Integers. Comp(t) is irrational, and IFB is complex
You have not addressed adding more requirements to the comp cape, nor have you addressed a combat/PVM cape. Which is what the poll actually reads. If you're trying to combine results in the poll you stated, you'd need to know the sample populations of both. Stats has rules on how you can combine data and look at it. Also, your "sizable" is much less than a majority - it's a minority.
Anyway, the polls actually show:
More support for adding in 1 cape, less than comp; easier to maintain.
Adding in requirements with a grace period.
Removing outdated requirements. My Threads:
Starting Player Owned Ports-v2
23-Mar-2019 03:25:02 - Last edited on 23-Mar-2019 03:32:41 by Uncl
Quick find code: 16-17-615-66089258 Back to Top