forums.rs

Forums

Game Integrity: Revision

Quick find code: 380-381-470-65997996

of 16
UIM Brent

UIM Brent

Posts: 3 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
POLL IT ALL SO IT WILL NOT PASS! Isn't that the whole point of osrs?? Player owned content game?? Don't go down the same path as rs3...or this will become just like it. If i'm not mistaking the anti dragon shields have already FAILED a poll so why in the world would you consider pushing it into the game anyways?? Whats the point in voting in polls at all when you are just going to do what you want to anyway?...This seems like its just the beginning of multiple bad decisions to come...Inb4 no wildy and trade limit..to get rid of "bots" even though bots still existed and all the real players quit. Don't make the same mistake down this road

17-Mar-2018 23:54:45

Iron Kang

Iron Kang

Posts: 4 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Reminiscon said :
Changes should not be based on how it affects ironman. They should just delete it tbh, the game mode itself is clearly producing toxic players that want Easyscape (which I find VERY ironic).

Pickpocketing Ardougne Knights is overpowered anyway. It deserves to be nerfed regardless of bots. But getting rid of the auto clickers trumps the "muh ironman is a bit harder to play now" whining.

''Ironman accounts want easyscape''

That's probably the dumbest thing I have read all day. As if players who choose the game mode where you can't trade, use the GE, and have to craft you're own items/get them from you're own monster drops is even remotely considered ''Easyscape''. That's some grade A tide pod level talk right there for real man.

18-Mar-2018 02:36:48

Iron Kang

Iron Kang

Posts: 4 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
UIM Brent said :
POLL IT ALL SO IT WILL NOT PASS! Isn't that the whole point of osrs?? Player owned content game?? Don't go down the same path as rs3...or this will become just like it. If i'm not mistaking the anti dragon shields have already FAILED a poll so why in the world would you consider pushing it into the game anyways?? Whats the point in voting in polls at all when you are just going to do what you want to anyway?...This seems like its just the beginning of multiple bad decisions to come...Inb4 no wildy and trade limit..to get rid of "bots" even though bots still existed and all the real players quit. Don't make the same mistake down this road

THIS^

Someone always has to come along with the good idea fairy stuff and ruin things that are perfectly fine to begin with.

18-Mar-2018 02:38:32

Monke Mania
Feb Member 2017

Monke Mania

Posts: 48 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
It's always good to see these issues brought to light and discussed, as they are very sorely needed.

An integrity issue that wasn't yet brought up, at least from what I've read in these posts so far is boss briefing for Ironmen. If the suggestions that bolster the use of instanced bosses does pass, I'd hope to potentially see the option for instances at Godwars, KQ and Corp, as there's not a whole lot more demoralizing than spending the time to get to these bosses, only to find that they're either accidentally or purposely damaged by someone else and ruin a drop. It's been happening more on a purposeful basis at Corp, as people will just sit outside of caves and intentionally grief a kill for whatever thrill it gives. I know Corp would be a bit more challenging, but I hope maybe there'd be some way to create a playerside instance that remains active even after teleporting (for Spec refills, banking etc). Otherwise maybe introducing standard instances for KQ and GWD bosses, and including changes in death mechanics to keep items safe, with a cost of course, so that there's still a risk involved.

Also, can there be clarification on the Enchanter's Mage Training Arena proposal? Short of allowing players their own instance, or buffing the amount of points given by playing the game without counting Dragonstones, I'm not quite sure what'll help there, though I'm thrilled to see it mentioned.

Again, thanks to all the Mods for bringing this issues out. I'm looking forward to seeing some positive changes.

18-Mar-2018 03:51:58

StaunchJoe
Mar Member 2024

StaunchJoe

Posts: 29 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
im not really happy with some of these updates but i can live without them how ever the thieving update is really just unforgiving people dislike thieving cause it is so painful and boring to do and ardy knights are the only thing helped that

taking away all coins from ardy knights and adding in random coin pouches offering 1k for 1-25-50 chance would aid us lower level thiefs cause we rely on those 28 inv spaces to actually survive there please re consider this update and be more mindful of other players before doing this love u guys love ur work but this is one think i will have to disagree on

18-Mar-2018 10:25:43

StaunchJoe
Mar Member 2024

StaunchJoe

Posts: 29 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
i just finished reading every comment here alot of people are concerned that all the failed polls are just gonna be re added cause u as osrs team want it in but us as osrs community do not we know the game we enjoy the game we pay for the game yet u are taking away our freedom to vote on this matter we came here from eoc because we enjoy the game now alot of people are saying u guys are just gonna ruin osrs like rs3 was please dont i enjoy this game way to much dont kill this game for us peace love u guys....p.s unless use do these updates without asking us

18-Mar-2018 10:54:56

Syprene

Syprene

Posts: 23 Bronze Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I'd like to add a suggestion to counter teleport tablet scams. What I propose is that when in non-pvp areas, use of teleport tablets requires a confirmation selection. Either that or prevent people from using teleport tablets for x amount of seconds after a trade has been declined or accepted.

I do like the zammy wine suggestion with a second floor, but I don't agree with Jagex's choice to not poll them all. I think a few of the suggestions should be polled, otherwise there's going to be some big problems for RS, similar to when free trade & the wilderness was removed without polling, you're forcing restrictions on the player base without them getting the option to say no.

18-Mar-2018 11:02:23

Yung SE

Yung SE

Posts: 124 Iron Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
The duel arena wasn't meant to a be a 50/50 coinflip casino, why make it that? These odds stakers that Jagex is trying to combat will simply FIND ANOTHER WAY to get their odds, and people will continue to stake against them because they lack the patience required to get a fair stake and are 100% willing to give up an edge in order to get a stake immediately.

The duel arena should remain completely unchanged, and the real solution to these problems is to actually put some work in and launch a full-scale investigation into the x'ers at the arena.

18-Mar-2018 12:07:27

Quick find code: 380-381-470-65997996 Back to Top