Page 2
Elder Maul:
Since it has less DPS than the bludgeon, It's way too situational PvM wise.
(or maybe not useful at all)
The best thing to compare it to for pvp would be the AGS for obvious reasons.
The AGS has a 132 atk bonus (slash). The Elder Maul has a 120 atkbonus (crush).
Lets test this on the average high lvl pk setups. (theres too many things to test)
setup 1: dh, fire cape, glory, d scim, d defender, b gloves, d boots: 318 slash def, 301 crush def.
= Maul is 5+ more accurate if you account for defence.
setup 2: same as one but replace dh with torags legs, torso, and neit helm: 264 slash def, 246 crush def.
= Maul is 6+ more accurate.
In the strength department, the maul wins by 15.
If we test this with setup 1, the maul's max hit is 58 while the AGS's is 55. (calculated with oldschool dot tools max hit calculator) (potted with piety ofc)
So the maul is around 5 points more accurate, and its max is about 3 dmg higher. (I don't think people understand how small this is)
HOWEVER, the AGS has a spec you can use at least twice in one fight which deals 37.5% more damage with double accuracy. (2 incomparably better hits vs the maul)
Conclusion: The 2 extremely better hits the AGS offers far outweigh the small advantages the maul has in normal hits. Infact, the ZGS seems better than the maul at this point. (2 extremely more accurate hits with a max about 2 dmg higher than maul)
Suggestion: There's NO need for another 75 attack 2h ko weapon, we have those already. Plus higher cb's have the dh axe. But I do think everyone would like more variety in pvp so good idea, but just some other kind of weapon.
(like d claws that hit in mage like the korasi)
^ joke
20-Aug-2016 02:22:56