forums.rs

Forums

Remove TH

Quick find code: 366-367-6-65940719

of 122
Sharp-shin

Sharp-shin

Posts: 41,301 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Draco Burnz said :
Sharp-shin said :

People didn't see MTX happening prior to it did either, yet it still happened, so MTX could be removed just as well as it was added. After all, MTX isn't something that's larger than life; all it'd take to remove it is for Jagex to remove its code from the game's source code.


Yea I see jagex removing one way the make profit right quick....

Plz think before posting.
Probably not voluntarily, true, but both government regulation and the inevitable decline of the playerbase due to the MTX would force them to.
"Volat Accipiter libera est; venandi sua natura est."
~Accipiter striatus

17-Aug-2019 13:23:26

Draco Burnz
Dec Member 2011

Draco Burnz

Posts: 79,296 Emerald Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Sharp-shin said :

Probably not voluntarily, true, but both government regulation and the inevitable decline of the playerbase due to the MTX would force them to.


Uhh, I don't see the playbase declining in any way.

The only reason the numbers are so low is due to the lack of bots.
Draco Burnz
Anime Fanatic
Defender of the logical

17-Aug-2019 14:11:49

Sharp-shin

Sharp-shin

Posts: 41,301 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Draco Burnz said :
Sharp-shin said :

Probably not voluntarily, true, but both government regulation and the inevitable decline of the playerbase due to the MTX would force them to.


Uhh, I don't see the playbase declining in any way.

The only reason the numbers are so low is due to the lack of bots.
RS3 has supposed to have been clear of bots for years now (this isn't the first time someone has tried to blame the lack of bots for the decline), yet the playerbase only ever continues to decline long term. I bet you that if we have this conversation again a year from now and nothing changes, you'll just blame it on the bots again, despite them supposedly being gone already.
"Volat Accipiter libera est; venandi sua natura est."
~Accipiter striatus

17-Aug-2019 15:05:44

keggyyy

keggyyy

Posts: 1,602 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
It's already been confirmed osrs is the more profitable game. They buy memberships and bonds which is the majority of the revenue and mxt revenue went down from 2017 to 2018. If were going to talk about profits though the NBA is more profitable then the NFL but more people based on the ratings watch the NFL

17-Aug-2019 16:03:13

Draco Burnz
Dec Member 2011

Draco Burnz

Posts: 79,296 Emerald Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Sharp-shin said :

RS3 has supposed to have been clear of bots for years now (this isn't the first time someone has tried to blame the lack of bots for the decline), yet the playerbase only ever continues to decline long term. I bet you that if we have this conversation again a year from now and nothing changes, you'll just blame it on the bots again, despite them supposedly being gone already.


Nah no games will ever truly be free of bots as theres always going to be ppl who cbb to play within the rules thus result to cheating.
Draco Burnz
Anime Fanatic
Defender of the logical

17-Aug-2019 17:38:32

Dilbert2001
Jun Member 2006

Dilbert2001

Posts: 30,176 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
keggyyy said :
It's already been confirmed osrs is the more profitable game. They buy memberships and bonds which is the majority of the revenue and mxt revenue went down from 2017 to 2018. If were going to talk about profits though the NBA is more profitable then the NFL but more people based on the ratings watch the NFL

OSRS already been "confirmed" as the more "profitable" game? Confirmed by what?

Confirmed by then nosediving "80k OSRS "playerbase" now or about half it had a few months ago?

Confirmed by the rising RS3 "playerbase" since 4 months ago in the face of the nosediving OSRS "playerbase"?

Confirmed by the substantial and sustainable TH and Runecoins sales of over £24 mil last year, solely exist only in RS3?

Confirmed by the 180% u-turn where OSRS is forced to embrace NEW SCHOOL ideas of live events and e-sports like DMM and pseduo gambling of the latest trending Battle Royale in LMS where players are going to be wagering gp they can instantly get from selling the Bond MTX hoping to win more gp in game?

17-Aug-2019 17:57:56

Draco Burnz
Dec Member 2011

Draco Burnz

Posts: 79,296 Emerald Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Dilbert2001 said :

OSRS already been "confirmed" as the more "profitable" game? Confirmed by what?

Confirmed by then nosediving "80k OSRS "playerbase" now or about half it had a few months ago?

Confirmed by the rising RS3 "playerbase" since 4 months ago in the face of the nosediving OSRS "playerbase"?

Confirmed by the substantial and sustainable TH and Runecoins sales of over £24 mil last year, solely exist only in RS3?

Confirmed by the 180% u-turn where OSRS is forced to embrace NEW SCHOOL ideas of live events and e-sports like DMM and pseduo gambling of the latest trending Battle Royale in LMS where players are going to be wagering gp they can instantly get from selling the Bond MTX hoping to win more gp in game?

Yea if any game is "declining" in playerbase its osrs not rs3.
Draco Burnz
Anime Fanatic
Defender of the logical

17-Aug-2019 18:00:03

Dilbert2001
Jun Member 2006

Dilbert2001

Posts: 30,176 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Draco Burnz said :
Dilbert2001 said :

OSRS already been "confirmed" as the more "profitable" game? Confirmed by what?

Confirmed by then nosediving "80k OSRS "playerbase" now or about half it had a few months ago?

Confirmed by the rising RS3 "playerbase" since 4 months ago in the face of the nosediving OSRS "playerbase"?

Confirmed by the substantial and sustainable TH and Runecoins sales of over £24 mil last year, solely exist only in RS3?

Confirmed by the 180% u-turn where OSRS is forced to embrace NEW SCHOOL ideas of live events and e-sports like DMM and pseduo gambling of the latest trending Battle Royale in LMS where players are going to be wagering gp they can instantly get from selling the Bond MTX hoping to win more gp in game?

Yea if any game is "declining" in playerbase its osrs not rs3.

Yes, and the decline in OSRS doesn't come from more MTX at all. It has to do with its content which can't retain players.

Likewise, RS3 playerbase is rising for a few months now, again because they have more appealing content but not more MTX.

It is extremely clear players don't care about MTX. They pay for the content, not the optional MTX.

17-Aug-2019 19:09:56

Draco Burnz
Dec Member 2011

Draco Burnz

Posts: 79,296 Emerald Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Tenebri said :
i wouldnt say remove it completely. keep cosmetics on th. but remove xp from it. even though damage has been done already

Meh.

At this point was really so bad about having "buyable xp"?

Like you said its beyond the point of no return so might as well leave as is.
Draco Burnz
Anime Fanatic
Defender of the logical

18-Aug-2019 01:11:38

Quick find code: 366-367-6-65940719 Back to Top