I feel you're doing a lot of dancing around the issue up there Transcendent, not to put too fine a point on it.
-- Not sure what OSRS "rares" has to do with the RS3 situation. Other than I'm glad the playerbase voted as they did, to not repeat what was widely acknowledged by Gowers and a historical generation of Jmods, as a mistake.
-- Bank bidders is perhaps relevant, but if so, it's still a tangent for purposes of this discussion. Bringing back items from rule-breakers' banks would not have been at all the same as a re-release.
-- The Discontinued forum, is just that, for discontinued items. How many tradeable items do we see going up on there that are being re-released? (This actually isn't rhetorical. I don't frequent that forum, so I don't know.) That also doesn't help us decide whether old "rares" (=discontinued, think Santas, Phats, Easter eggs, Pumpkins, etc etc) will be returned. I'd say they probably won't be, but hypothetically, what if they were? Would that forum just be changed to "rares" (in the sense of a new definition).
The takeaway message for me from your lengthy post is that we're still left wondering what Jagex's official stance is on "rares" and "discontinued items" in 2017.
Hence, the thread.
12-Nov-2017 15:49:18