I doubt that Sliske is his own master, so let's not do the whole "He has a split personality" thing. It would also be
very
boring to me. But as for why I don't believe it, the master is the one who told Sliske how to use the Staff of Armadyl. Even if Sliske did have a split personality, do you really think it would have known enough about the Siphon to give that "tip-off"?
And Sliske had to beat up Strisath to get it. Yes, Sithaph has absent, but if Strisath was the one with the Staff, why didn't Sithaph just
give
the Staff to Sliske? Sithaph and Strisath are supposed to be on the same sides, so the master would only be Sithaph if he defected from the Necrosy*tes.
I think this exchange from Fate of the Gods is what we need.
Player: "So Zaros did order you to kill Guthix?"
Sliske: "That was more my... interpretation. Zaros wanted to return, but I saw futility in bargaining with Guthix. I suspect Zaros knew that, but he's not exactly forthcoming."
We've noticed that the mysterious voice is
very
direct and to the point. Sliske was drifting away from Zaros because Zaros plays all his cards close to his chest. That may be how Sliske likes to play it, but it's not exactly what he'd like in a master. So the master really can't be Zaros, as the main reason Sliske would like working for this master is because they're open about what they want in a way Zaros rarely was.
25-May-2016 18:15:59