Hazeel
said
:
Looking back, I've noticed a huge flaw with Zaros' deal...
Sliske: Enough. The game is over. Armadyl, take your stone and do with it what you will!
Zaros: Armadyl, my Praetor Plumalis, it is time to uphold our bargain.
The deal for all the Gods was that they were bound to do Zaros one favor during Sliske's game. But a game is over once the winner is delcared--indeed Sliske even said the game is over. So for what reason should any of the Gods comply? Zaros is asking for his favor when the game is already finished, they don't owe him a thing.
1. Because they aren't as lawyer-y as Zaros and Seren.
2. Because one could define a game as being over only after the victor has claimed their prize (up until they do, they can still forfeit).
3. It depends on how one defines Sliske's game. I'll let the characters spell this one out for me:
Sliske: But she said that... It doesn't matter, the game is over. The Stone of Jas now belongs to Armadyl. My game is complete.
Zaros: Come now Sliske. We both know that this is only the beginning of your game. You know well that any god possessing the stone is just a precursor to all-out war.
Sliske: Ok, you've got me there. The Catalyst is the perfect fire to spark the fuse. The other gods aren't just going to accept this decision. They'll try and take the stone by force. And with no Guthix to banish them, it will rip this world to pieces, quite literally when you remember who's sleeping below.
Or alternatively:
Saradomin: Enough of your bluster Sliske. This game is over.
Zaros: On the contrary Saradomin. There is one more roll of the dice.
Granted, with Sliske's apparent demise and the Stone's destruction, that particular game of Sliske's is indeed over now, but it wasn't when Zaros called in his pact.
01-Jan-2017 02:04:57
- Last edited on
01-Jan-2017 02:07:21
by
Hguoh