Forums
The Defence of Saradomin
Quick find code: 341-342-605-65228310
Some people blame the victim of a violent attack instead of the attacker. Sometimes never out loud but in the attitude they direct toward the victim. An attitude of 'well, something bad happened to them so they must have deserved it. . . "
Sometimes a victim is just a victim and the attacker is just a scumbag and not some kind of divine retribution. The purpose of adventure is to shine light into dark places,
Poke monsters with a sharp stick, Then steal anything that isn't nailed down!
To the Manor Born QFC 185-186-367-65788716
Sometimes a victim is just a victim and the attacker is just a scumbag and not some kind of divine retribution. The purpose of adventure is to shine light into dark places,
Poke monsters with a sharp stick, Then steal anything that isn't nailed down!
To the Manor Born QFC 185-186-367-65788716
25-Dec-2013 09:57:48
Seasons greetings to one and all!
The purpose of adventure is to shine light into dark places,
Poke monsters with a sharp stick, Then steal anything that isn't nailed down!
To the Manor Born QFC 185-186-367-65788716
The purpose of adventure is to shine light into dark places,
Poke monsters with a sharp stick, Then steal anything that isn't nailed down!
To the Manor Born QFC 185-186-367-65788716
25-Dec-2013 12:47:15
Solanumtinkr
said
:
Some people blame the victim of a violent attack instead of the attacker. Sometimes never out loud but in the attitude they direct toward the victim. An attitude of 'well, something bad happened to them so they must have deserved it. . . "
Sometimes a victim is just a victim and the attacker is just a scumbag and not some kind of divine retribution.
Well Saradomin isn't known for being just a scumbag, more that he sees everything through a lens of self-righteousness.
Saradomin thinks that he is benevolent. When we're theorizing his actions, we need to keep that in mind.
Ex: Saradomin kicks a puppy.
theoretical justification: That puppy was chewing on his ankle.
Overly apologetic justification: That puppy was a Zamorakian agent, sent to assassinate him. Headcanon Haven, where everything is made up and the points don't matter.
OSRS Lore: Xeric
Slepe Tight - Slepe Lore
Some people blame the victim of a violent attack instead of the attacker. Sometimes never out loud but in the attitude they direct toward the victim. An attitude of 'well, something bad happened to them so they must have deserved it. . . "
Sometimes a victim is just a victim and the attacker is just a scumbag and not some kind of divine retribution.
Well Saradomin isn't known for being just a scumbag, more that he sees everything through a lens of self-righteousness.
Saradomin thinks that he is benevolent. When we're theorizing his actions, we need to keep that in mind.
Ex: Saradomin kicks a puppy.
theoretical justification: That puppy was chewing on his ankle.
Overly apologetic justification: That puppy was a Zamorakian agent, sent to assassinate him. Headcanon Haven, where everything is made up and the points don't matter.
OSRS Lore: Xeric
Slepe Tight - Slepe Lore
25-Dec-2013 20:58:52 - Last edited on 25-Dec-2013 21:00:47 by Lego Miester
Lego Miester
said
:
Solanumtinkr said :
Some people blame the victim of a violent attack instead of the attacker. Sometimes never out loud but in the attitude they direct toward the victim. An attitude of 'well, something bad happened to them so they must have deserved it. . . "
Sometimes a victim is just a victim and the attacker is just a scumbag and not some kind of divine retribution.
Well Saradomin isn't known for being just a scumbag, more that he sees everything through a lens of self-righteousness.
Saradomin thinks that he is benevolent. When we're theorizing his actions, we need to keep that in mind.
Ex: Saradomin kicks a puppy.
theoretical justification: That puppy was chewing on his ankle.
Overly apologetic justification: That puppy was a Zamorakian agent, sent to assassinate him.
You're wrong, Azzy is a puppy.
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
7. Azzanadra. Fanatical devotion has never been so easy to emphasize with. He's like a puppy, and ridiculously powerful, shape-shifting, soul destroying puppy.
That is the best description of Azzy I've ever seen. Just how he stands in front of his master's portal, it's much like how a puppy eagerly awaits the return of it's owner as it sits staring longingly out the window...
Let's just hope he doesn't pee himself in excitement when Zaros returns.
Solanumtinkr said :
Some people blame the victim of a violent attack instead of the attacker. Sometimes never out loud but in the attitude they direct toward the victim. An attitude of 'well, something bad happened to them so they must have deserved it. . . "
Sometimes a victim is just a victim and the attacker is just a scumbag and not some kind of divine retribution.
Well Saradomin isn't known for being just a scumbag, more that he sees everything through a lens of self-righteousness.
Saradomin thinks that he is benevolent. When we're theorizing his actions, we need to keep that in mind.
Ex: Saradomin kicks a puppy.
theoretical justification: That puppy was chewing on his ankle.
Overly apologetic justification: That puppy was a Zamorakian agent, sent to assassinate him.
You're wrong, Azzy is a puppy.
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
7. Azzanadra. Fanatical devotion has never been so easy to emphasize with. He's like a puppy, and ridiculously powerful, shape-shifting, soul destroying puppy.
That is the best description of Azzy I've ever seen. Just how he stands in front of his master's portal, it's much like how a puppy eagerly awaits the return of it's owner as it sits staring longingly out the window...
Let's just hope he doesn't pee himself in excitement when Zaros returns.
25-Dec-2013 21:13:35 - Last edited on 25-Dec-2013 21:14:00 by Velia
Velia
said
:
Lego Miester said :
Solanumtinkr said :
Some people blame the victim of a violent attack instead of the attacker. Sometimes never out loud but in the attitude they direct toward the victim. An attitude of 'well, something bad happened to them so they must have deserved it. . . "
Sometimes a victim is just a victim and the attacker is just a scumbag and not some kind of divine retribution.
Well Saradomin isn't known for being just a scumbag, more that he sees everything through a lens of self-righteousness.
Saradomin thinks that he is benevolent. When we're theorizing his actions, we need to keep that in mind.
Ex: Saradomin kicks a puppy.
theoretical justification: That puppy was chewing on his ankle.
Overly apologetic justification: That puppy was a Zamorakian agent, sent to assassinate him.
You're wrong, Azzy is a puppy.
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
7. Azzanadra. Fanatical devotion has never been so easy to emphasize with. He's like a puppy, and ridiculously powerful, shape-shifting, soul destroying puppy.
That is the best description of Azzy I've ever seen. Just how he stands in front of his master's portal, it's much like how a puppy eagerly awaits the return of it's owner as it sits staring longingly out the window...
Let's just hope he doesn't pee himself in excitement when Zaros returns.
atleast azzy is level headed and not KILL EVERYTHING IN THE NAME OF I make videos.
Lego Miester said :
Solanumtinkr said :
Some people blame the victim of a violent attack instead of the attacker. Sometimes never out loud but in the attitude they direct toward the victim. An attitude of 'well, something bad happened to them so they must have deserved it. . . "
Sometimes a victim is just a victim and the attacker is just a scumbag and not some kind of divine retribution.
Well Saradomin isn't known for being just a scumbag, more that he sees everything through a lens of self-righteousness.
Saradomin thinks that he is benevolent. When we're theorizing his actions, we need to keep that in mind.
Ex: Saradomin kicks a puppy.
theoretical justification: That puppy was chewing on his ankle.
Overly apologetic justification: That puppy was a Zamorakian agent, sent to assassinate him.
You're wrong, Azzy is a puppy.
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
7. Azzanadra. Fanatical devotion has never been so easy to emphasize with. He's like a puppy, and ridiculously powerful, shape-shifting, soul destroying puppy.
That is the best description of Azzy I've ever seen. Just how he stands in front of his master's portal, it's much like how a puppy eagerly awaits the return of it's owner as it sits staring longingly out the window...
Let's just hope he doesn't pee himself in excitement when Zaros returns.
atleast azzy is level headed and not KILL EVERYTHING IN THE NAME OF I make videos.
25-Dec-2013 21:15:44
Lego Miester
said
:
Solanumtinkr said :
Some people blame the victim of a violent attack instead of the attacker. Sometimes never out loud but in the attitude they direct toward the victim. An attitude of 'well, something bad happened to them so they must have deserved it. . . "
Sometimes a victim is just a victim and the attacker is just a scumbag and not some kind of divine retribution.
Well Saradomin isn't known for being just a scumbag, more that he sees everything through a lens of self-righteousness.
Saradomin thinks that he is benevolent. When we're theorizing his actions, we need to keep that in mind.
Ex: Saradomin kicks a puppy.
theoretical justification: That puppy was chewing on his ankle.
Overly apologetic justification: That puppy was a Zamorakian agent, sent to assassinate him.
I'm not singling anyone out in particular for being the attacker with that statement, just that people can and do blame the victim, even if unconsciously at times. As if it might be contagious. It's not logical, but feelings never are. Don't focus on the attacker part of that statement, instead realise that it is unwise to attack the victim in attempt to assign the blame to them instead. The purpose of adventure is to shine light into dark places,
Poke monsters with a sharp stick, Then steal anything that isn't nailed down!
To the Manor Born QFC 185-186-367-65788716
Solanumtinkr said :
Some people blame the victim of a violent attack instead of the attacker. Sometimes never out loud but in the attitude they direct toward the victim. An attitude of 'well, something bad happened to them so they must have deserved it. . . "
Sometimes a victim is just a victim and the attacker is just a scumbag and not some kind of divine retribution.
Well Saradomin isn't known for being just a scumbag, more that he sees everything through a lens of self-righteousness.
Saradomin thinks that he is benevolent. When we're theorizing his actions, we need to keep that in mind.
Ex: Saradomin kicks a puppy.
theoretical justification: That puppy was chewing on his ankle.
Overly apologetic justification: That puppy was a Zamorakian agent, sent to assassinate him.
I'm not singling anyone out in particular for being the attacker with that statement, just that people can and do blame the victim, even if unconsciously at times. As if it might be contagious. It's not logical, but feelings never are. Don't focus on the attacker part of that statement, instead realise that it is unwise to attack the victim in attempt to assign the blame to them instead. The purpose of adventure is to shine light into dark places,
Poke monsters with a sharp stick, Then steal anything that isn't nailed down!
To the Manor Born QFC 185-186-367-65788716
25-Dec-2013 21:17:10 - Last edited on 25-Dec-2013 21:20:50 by Solanumtinkr
Azzykins is so cute and adorable
Carn
Carn
26-Dec-2013 07:11:53
Solanumtinkr
said
:
Lego Miester said :
Solanumtinkr said :
Some people blame the victim of a violent attack instead of the attacker. Sometimes never out loud but in the attitude they direct toward the victim. An attitude of 'well, something bad happened to them so they must have deserved it. . . "
Sometimes a victim is just a victim and the attacker is just a scumbag and not some kind of divine retribution.
Well Saradomin isn't known for being just a scumbag, more that he sees everything through a lens of self-righteousness.
Saradomin thinks that he is benevolent. When we're theorizing his actions, we need to keep that in mind.
Ex: Saradomin kicks a puppy.
theoretical justification: That puppy was chewing on his ankle.
Overly apologetic justification: That puppy was a Zamorakian agent, sent to assassinate him.
I'm not singling anyone out in particular for being the attacker with that statement, just that people can and do blame the victim, even if unconsciously at times. As if it might be contagious. It's not logical, but feelings never are. Don't focus on the attacker part of that statement, instead realise that it is unwise to attack the victim in attempt to assign the blame to them instead.
I can understand where you are coming from
For example sometimes when people get mugged, others are like, why were you walking around so late at night in dark alley ways.
Or
Lots of times when people get their runescape account hacked people will say, "you should have made your account safer" " its your own fault for giving people your p word"
Lego Miester said :
Solanumtinkr said :
Some people blame the victim of a violent attack instead of the attacker. Sometimes never out loud but in the attitude they direct toward the victim. An attitude of 'well, something bad happened to them so they must have deserved it. . . "
Sometimes a victim is just a victim and the attacker is just a scumbag and not some kind of divine retribution.
Well Saradomin isn't known for being just a scumbag, more that he sees everything through a lens of self-righteousness.
Saradomin thinks that he is benevolent. When we're theorizing his actions, we need to keep that in mind.
Ex: Saradomin kicks a puppy.
theoretical justification: That puppy was chewing on his ankle.
Overly apologetic justification: That puppy was a Zamorakian agent, sent to assassinate him.
I'm not singling anyone out in particular for being the attacker with that statement, just that people can and do blame the victim, even if unconsciously at times. As if it might be contagious. It's not logical, but feelings never are. Don't focus on the attacker part of that statement, instead realise that it is unwise to attack the victim in attempt to assign the blame to them instead.
I can understand where you are coming from
For example sometimes when people get mugged, others are like, why were you walking around so late at night in dark alley ways.
Or
Lots of times when people get their runescape account hacked people will say, "you should have made your account safer" " its your own fault for giving people your p word"
26-Dec-2013 18:04:09 - Last edited on 26-Dec-2013 18:05:03 by Cthris
Quick find code: 341-342-605-65228310 Back to Top