Was Zamorak reluctant to use the Stone for the right reasons, or did he just not want to nuke half of Zaros' old land, that he wanted as his own?
Was Zamorak offering some concessions in his negotiation (and willing to give some leeway to meet a peaceful resolution), or was he threatening death and destruction if they didn't "see his way"?
Those are important questions to ask (motive isn't the end all be all, but it matters).
Zamorak would have been at a disadvantage in negotiations at the time. Negotiations require a good deal of trust, and Zamorak's history has quite a notable betrayal in it (taking down Zaros was something of legend of Gielinor). You can argue it was to the gain of the other gods, but that's still a bad sign for the gods who could potentially also get backstabbed (if he took out a stronger god as a mortal, what could he do as a god).
Not to mention that (if this is the end of the war), they've dealt with fighting Zamorak for 4000 years. Saradomin probably remembers having to protect his Imcando Dwarves from Zamorak's Chaos Dwarf curse, and the deaths of many followers. Armadyl probably wasn't pleased with what the war did to the Aviansie. Bandos...well, Bandos probably wanted a go at Zamorak.
There was probably a fear of what would happen if he regrew his army and tried to repeat things all over again (plus some imperfect meshing of differing philosophy).
That whole war started over power (that all sides had equal claim to given they weren't the rightful owners, and both just grabbed the Stone when nobody else had it on hand), and by God, it ended with a show of power.
Regardless of who started it, it was not handled well (Bandos dragging the thing out for thousands of years with side-switching especially so). It's too late to redo the past, that's for sure. But the future? Maybe this "God War" can be handled better. Whether they want to or not, the gods will have to eventually get past their issues with one another for the greater threat.
25-Feb-2015 18:47:33