Balustan
said
:
I mean other than the fact he was going to kill everybody then yeah no reason to kill Drakan...
Depending on the differing dialogue trees, all we know for sure is he wants to kill the Myreque and that depends upon us agreeing to go to kill Drakan in the first place - a person who is not our enemy. Also we don't have to kill him. We beat him to submission, there was no need to stake him
Balustan said :
I hope he's not Ascertes. It makes no sense if Safalaan is dead as he should remain. Visiting Vanstrom's past has been the intention since Branches at least. My view is that if used in the context of exploring another character, say one with a related name, it is absolutely fine.
Depends on the execution. I don't see any emotional wait in the reveal at this time and trying to fix characters post death just proves they were poorly done in the first place.
Balustan said :
I think it makes sense that he left his sister alive. He clearly wasn't thrilled to be killing her. Perhaps he couldn't take down Safalaan due to Icyene powers.
Drakan is willing to kill her later. If we have to speculate why he couldn't kill Safalaan then thats flawed writing. Regardless the villains should kill someone but decided not to for arbitrary reasoning then is killed because of this is a bad writing cliche. Needs to be less of this in general.
Balustan said :
She should feature in a small part of the finale, a necessary role, but not as I fear where she will become the saviour in the end leading to a happily ever after ending.
I think bringing her in at all risks undermining the ending. This is literally a angel like being thought dead returning to beat the evil vampires. Its so disengaging.
I mean other than the fact he was going to kill everybody then yeah no reason to kill Drakan...
Depending on the differing dialogue trees, all we know for sure is he wants to kill the Myreque and that depends upon us agreeing to go to kill Drakan in the first place - a person who is not our enemy. Also we don't have to kill him. We beat him to submission, there was no need to stake him
Balustan said :
I hope he's not Ascertes. It makes no sense if Safalaan is dead as he should remain. Visiting Vanstrom's past has been the intention since Branches at least. My view is that if used in the context of exploring another character, say one with a related name, it is absolutely fine.
Depends on the execution. I don't see any emotional wait in the reveal at this time and trying to fix characters post death just proves they were poorly done in the first place.
Balustan said :
I think it makes sense that he left his sister alive. He clearly wasn't thrilled to be killing her. Perhaps he couldn't take down Safalaan due to Icyene powers.
Drakan is willing to kill her later. If we have to speculate why he couldn't kill Safalaan then thats flawed writing. Regardless the villains should kill someone but decided not to for arbitrary reasoning then is killed because of this is a bad writing cliche. Needs to be less of this in general.
Balustan said :
She should feature in a small part of the finale, a necessary role, but not as I fear where she will become the saviour in the end leading to a happily ever after ending.
I think bringing her in at all risks undermining the ending. This is literally a angel like being thought dead returning to beat the evil vampires. Its so disengaging.
20-Dec-2015 14:47:29