Draco Burnz
said
:
Turksta
said
:
They could've at least created similar or better yet different items and not screw over players no?
Yes they could have, sadly they chose not too as the originals were the ones which made them the most money.
So then maybe they can get ideas of the originals, see what made them sell so well and make more items that have the attributes of the originals?
Turksta
said
:
So then maybe they can get ideas of the originals, see what made them sell so well and make more items that have the attributes of the originals?
Or they can make it easier on themselves and rerelease the originals.
Draco Burnz
said
:
Turksta
said
:
So then maybe they can get ideas of the originals, see what made them sell so well and make more items that have the attributes of the originals?
Or they can make it easier on themselves and rerelease the originals.
Yes they can make it easier on themselves, do that and create a bad name out of themselves, stab theose particular customers behind the back as well as make less profits from those customers.
Turksta
said
:
Yes they can make it easier on themselves, do that and create a bad name out of themselves, stab theose particular customers behind the back as well as make less profits from those customers.
Again, if they can make money, who cares what others think?
Draco Burnz
said
:
Turksta
said
:
Yes they can make it easier on themselves, do that and create a bad name out of themselves, stab theose particular customers behind the back as well as make less profits from those customers.
Again, if they can make money, who cares what others think?
They can make money, but they can do that regardless, so i don't know why they chose the immoral way of doing so.
Draco Burnz
said
:
Turksta
said
:
They can make money, but they can do that regardless, so i don't know why they chose the immoral way of doing so.
You're the only one saying its immoral.
So what they think is "moral" or not is, ofc, different from yours.
I'm not only one who thinks it immoral. Go ask anyone and i'm sure everyone will agree.
In this case the definition of 'moral' isn't subjective: there's only one side to it and that is if something is advertised as being discontinued then it should be as such. Recontinuing it is immoral.
Jagex said they would never introduce microtransactions and you defend the introduction of microtransactions by the new ownership of Jagex.
Well Jagex has a new ownership yet again, so all promises made in the past mean nothing, only promises made in the last year should be taken at face value.