Archaeox
said
:
So, to recap:
In the first post, I set out the case that FMR is no longer fit for purpose, and needs to be replaced.
Instead, on page 3
Thoughts on all of this please?
I don't know if you read my posts much, but I suggested at least a few times that a built-in reporting function would supplant any need for the FMR thread.
The flaw there - which I also said - is that someone still has to give a [REDACTED] to react to the reports.
So I guess I'm suggesting replacing one defective system with another defective system, given that the "transparency" aspect would be lost.
The other solution in my opinion would be - now wait for it- put more than 1 person on the task!
So, to recap:
In the first post, I set out the case that FMR is no longer fit for purpose, and needs to be replaced.
My
own suggestion was that it be replaced by submitting support tickets to be dealt with by suitably trained Customer Support staff; this however would evidently be insufficiently transparent.
Instead, on page 3
Iceberg
suggested moving FMR requests to the Community E-Mail inbox, allowing CMods to take on part of the burden of responding to posts (as they were originally meant to do) - and would make sense, given that the community E-Mail inbox is already used to review moderation in the RuneScape Discord. This again, however, would decrease transparency.
Twillow
, supported by
Mrs Ana
, then suggested, also on page 3, that the responses to FMR requests sent to the Community E-mail inbox could be made on a forum FMR sticky (which would have only 'answers/responses', and so wouldn't need an auto hide). This would go some way to meeting the need for transparency.
Others
have suggested that FMR is perfectly fine but just needs to be better prioritised so that it gets dealt with far more regularly.
Yet others
feel that Staff are active enough on FMR already, and no changes are needed.
Thoughts on all of this please?
I don't know if you read my posts much, but I suggested at least a few times that a built-in reporting function would supplant any need for the FMR thread.
The flaw there - which I also said - is that someone still has to give a [REDACTED] to react to the reports.
So I guess I'm suggesting replacing one defective system with another defective system, given that the "transparency" aspect would be lost.
The other solution in my opinion would be - now wait for it- put more than 1 person on the task!
02-Jun-2021 18:47:02