Forums
Labelling a thread misleading
Quick find code: 278-279-321-66183519
Mrs Ana
said
:
Dilbert2001 said :
They are not required to, but of course
I 100% believe what I wrote, especially with what I highlighted here is 100% clear already. If you don't think so, shrug and I have nothing else to add.
Dilbert2001 said :
They are not required to, but of course
they can
.
Right, so it would be ideal and beneficial to your suggestion to clarify this. You first stated that J-Mods were going to review this (per your quotes above) and now, you are saying that it's only for F-Mods and that J-Mods MAY review it if they wished to. It's nice to have a firm stance so that the public does not get confused.
if they want to
I 100% believe what I wrote, especially with what I highlighted here is 100% clear already. If you don't think so, shrug and I have nothing else to add.
12-Oct-2020 22:00:06
Dilbert2001
said
:
I 100% believe what I wrote, especially with what I highlighted here is 100% clear already. If you don't think so, shrug and I have nothing else to add.
Thus with this i guess we're better off sticking to whats already available as this wont change anything.
Jmods still wont read the forums as they have no reason to.
So just report misleading info if it goes to far to the fmods.
I 100% believe what I wrote, especially with what I highlighted here is 100% clear already. If you don't think so, shrug and I have nothing else to add.
Thus with this i guess we're better off sticking to whats already available as this wont change anything.
Jmods still wont read the forums as they have no reason to.
So just report misleading info if it goes to far to the fmods.
Draco Burnz
Anime Fanatic
Defender of the logical
12-Oct-2020 22:39:23 - Last edited on 12-Oct-2020 22:39:59 by Draco Burnz
Dilbert2001
said
:
I 100% believe what I wrote, especially with what I highlighted here is 100% clear already. If you don't think so, shrug and I have nothing else to add.
It isn't a matter of me thinking so or not. I'm just trying to clarify your position on this specific suggestion of yours. Firstly, you mentioned that J-Mods would check this out. See below:
Dilbert2001 said :
Labelling a thread misleading is just flagging it
Dilbert2001 said :
The misleading label is for the Fmods to add,
It's all right to be confused at times. We are all humans. It's just best to make it clear to allow for better discussions.
This will not change. If you believe someone is making a "misleading" statement, as CM Nick has suggested for you to do, you are more than welcome to use Forum Help to alert the F-Mods/CMs. If CMs believe that a J-Mod must interfere, then they will escalate the issue to them. If that does not work for you, then you also have the choice of ignoring such threads/comments.
Best of luck
.
CM Nick said :
I think a simpler solution would just be to report these instances of misinformation to Forum Help, as instituting new features on the RSOF is a time consuming and arduous process, whereas using Forum Help is fairly quick, and if it's indeed damaging misinformation, it'll be cleared up/clarified, or removed.
I 100% believe what I wrote, especially with what I highlighted here is 100% clear already. If you don't think so, shrug and I have nothing else to add.
It isn't a matter of me thinking so or not. I'm just trying to clarify your position on this specific suggestion of yours. Firstly, you mentioned that J-Mods would check this out. See below:
Dilbert2001 said :
Labelling a thread misleading is just flagging it
for Jmod review
while making all the RSOF users aware of the REAL facts.
Then, you said this:
Dilbert2001 said :
The misleading label is for the Fmods to add,
it doesn't involve the Jmods
.
How does that make sense to you or anyone else trying to opine on this idea? It was confusing and this is the main reason I pointed it out to you. I wanted to be 100% sure of what your stance was regarding J-Mods. After having pointed that out to you, you somehow said, "They can check it if they want to."
It's all right to be confused at times. We are all humans. It's just best to make it clear to allow for better discussions.
This will not change. If you believe someone is making a "misleading" statement, as CM Nick has suggested for you to do, you are more than welcome to use Forum Help to alert the F-Mods/CMs. If CMs believe that a J-Mod must interfere, then they will escalate the issue to them. If that does not work for you, then you also have the choice of ignoring such threads/comments.
Best of luck
.
CM Nick said :
I think a simpler solution would just be to report these instances of misinformation to Forum Help, as instituting new features on the RSOF is a time consuming and arduous process, whereas using Forum Help is fairly quick, and if it's indeed damaging misinformation, it'll be cleared up/clarified, or removed.
13-Oct-2020 14:41:56 - Last edited on 13-Oct-2020 15:20:27 by Mrs Ana
Draco Burnz
said
:
Thus with this i guess we're better off sticking to whats already available as this wont change anything.
Jmods still wont read the forums as they have no reason to.
So just report misleading info if it goes to far to the fmods. Well said, Draco
.
Thus with this i guess we're better off sticking to whats already available as this wont change anything.
Jmods still wont read the forums as they have no reason to.
So just report misleading info if it goes to far to the fmods. Well said, Draco
.
13-Oct-2020 14:51:51
Quick find code: 278-279-321-66183519 Back to Top