Dilbert2001
said
:
I see the problem with User A. They just don't agree with the Fmod and they don't respect the FH procedure.
They were many situations I didn't agree with the Fmods, but I respected the FH procedure. The problem is the current FH procedure though. When there were FMR we could have Jmods to go over issues, but now we can only accept what FMod(s) told us so with anything within the forums. However, if things go way pass the line of the judgement of whoever handling the forums, then I still respect the rulings of the forums and don't argue with them, and take my issues to the other channels where they belong better.
So what change I think we need: bring back FMR.
The thing with FMR that nobody understood or chose not to was the fact that it wasn't there if you disagreed with the F-mods actions. It was there is the F-mods were in fact breaking the code of conduct. Which is what let to all the, when you did get responses of the f-mod was correct which just threw gasoline on a fire (enraging the person who reported the perceived slight to begin with).
Personally I have a rather dark humor and a think skin. There was alot of stuff here on the forums that I had to lock that I personally found quite entertaining. However the rules are the rules and I knew that when I signed on the dotted line that I'd follow.
Personally I always viewed the FMR thread as a bunch of toddlers screaming they stole my rattle. The only plus to it was that it was semi anonymous when posting. However as you could see the name of the last person who posted. You could kinda tell if they were reporting your actions.
As to the questions of the queries for clarification on forum help work or not. They do as it was a query made there about one of my posts that ultimately led to my down fall...
It's alright though I bear nobody any ill-will. However I always pictured my fall with far more grandeur. Oh well
I see the problem with User A. They just don't agree with the Fmod and they don't respect the FH procedure.
They were many situations I didn't agree with the Fmods, but I respected the FH procedure. The problem is the current FH procedure though. When there were FMR we could have Jmods to go over issues, but now we can only accept what FMod(s) told us so with anything within the forums. However, if things go way pass the line of the judgement of whoever handling the forums, then I still respect the rulings of the forums and don't argue with them, and take my issues to the other channels where they belong better.
So what change I think we need: bring back FMR.
The thing with FMR that nobody understood or chose not to was the fact that it wasn't there if you disagreed with the F-mods actions. It was there is the F-mods were in fact breaking the code of conduct. Which is what let to all the, when you did get responses of the f-mod was correct which just threw gasoline on a fire (enraging the person who reported the perceived slight to begin with).
Personally I have a rather dark humor and a think skin. There was alot of stuff here on the forums that I had to lock that I personally found quite entertaining. However the rules are the rules and I knew that when I signed on the dotted line that I'd follow.
Personally I always viewed the FMR thread as a bunch of toddlers screaming they stole my rattle. The only plus to it was that it was semi anonymous when posting. However as you could see the name of the last person who posted. You could kinda tell if they were reporting your actions.
As to the questions of the queries for clarification on forum help work or not. They do as it was a query made there about one of my posts that ultimately led to my down fall...
It's alright though I bear nobody any ill-will. However I always pictured my fall with far more grandeur. Oh well
When the day becomes the night and the sky becomes the sea, when the clock strikes heavy and there’s no time for tea; and in our darkest hour, before my final rhyme, she will come back home to Wonderland and turn back the hands of time.
18-Sep-2023 16:18:26
