That this drew criticism from you both, is good.
Oh, and I've noticed the post that ends with a line of a technique, and then doesn't show the rest of it. Never finished that section in the original either.
Of Warfare,
Good to know that about MMA, I've definitely overvalued it.
Amalarik,
Indeed, that's why I organized this for the Sicarius based upon distance: the first section had to do with the approach and being able to reach their arms, the second their body, and the third, on the ground. As someone who used to practice Shinsei Kenpo (though that was many years ago), I've felt this lesson - I'll be sure to mention it in the large guide. (Not this one, but the one in progress.)
Reading that last part of your second paragraph brought a smile to my face, as it reminded me of a similar saying by the treatises made by the fight-masters of the German school of fencing. My own version of it is that
every attack has it's counter, and every counter has it's attack
. Certainly, there are no unbeatable moves, just failures to respond to an attack or counter correctly, and then put oneself in a position to be hit.
I didn't name these techniques, I'll admit I never really understood why they were called ''death blows''. If you have any insights as to why they might have been called such in the 14th century, speak - that includes you, Of Warfare.
Certainly agree with the last paragraph as well, that was the point of a flow chart: writing out likely actions before an rp fight, and thus be prepared for failed attacks and attacks.
20-Apr-2014 20:58:30