Forums

Climate Change: Not Just CO2

Quick find code: 23-24-60-62485114

XSlay4DeathX
Mar Member 2007

XSlay4DeathX

Posts: 2,634 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Joel said :
Origin Nexus said :
Joel said :
Not to mention, vehicles running on gas are extremely inefficient with most of the energy being used is lost to waste heat rather than propulsion. That isn't the case with EVs.
That IS the case with EVs, except the majority waste heat is produced at the power plant, not in the vehicle. The typical fossil fuel plant is less than 50% efficient, and coal plants are around 35% efficient. Not only that, but there is massive energy loss in the transportation of electricity. Every time a step down or step up transformer is used in the grid, a loss of about 2% is present. There is also line loss. Depending on what statistics you're looking at, the losses are reported as being as high as 15% just during distribution.

You need to look at the bigger picture, instead of narrowly focusing.

And what about the extraction of oil from the ground, to the refinement and then transportation of gasoline before it even hits the gas tank to give vehicles about a 16% efficiency rate? All while not being renewable after it has been burnt off.

An EV is around 76%+ efficient in terms of the energy it uses for propulsion, not to mention the use of regen braking to recover even more energy that would otherwise just be lost.

Power generation is a separate debate to how energy efficient end devices (in this case a vehicle) are and can be in the future. There's many ways to generate power, all with their own different levels of efficiency.

The amount of energy that hits the earth from the sun alone each day is staggering, even if we can capture a fraction of that in addition to hydro, wind, nuclear etc.


But without modern slavery(something i'm HIGHLY against) your batteries your using would be 250k +

"hey honey!, battery ran dry again, have to sell off half the house to pay for new one" "OMG mine died to!" "what?!! O_o "

29-May-2023 20:19:26

Origin Nexus

Origin Nexus

Posts: 322 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Joel said :
Do you believe (as almost all climate scientists do) that the climate change is a thing and we've had a part to play in that?
You mean climate scientists like Dr. Mickey Mouse?

Stop claiming that "almost all climate scientists agree" when it's not true. That's just a narrative being pushed by climate alarmists. Even NASA's own award winning climate scientists have stated that "there is no climate emergency".

Joel said :
Because whether we've had a small or huge impact on the climate (whichever side of the fence you sit), the climate is changing and we need to address it meaningfully.
The climate is ALWAYS changing... where has the Earth's climate EVER stayed the same? It hasn't. It goes through cycles.


But, for the sake of debate, let's pretend that humans have had an impact in raising the temperature 1 degree Fahrenheit over the last 100 years.


https://youtu.be/ONsmJAyFAAw


https://youtu.be/pHclBYf4Xmc


https://youtu.be/6oxOvjoBeMQ


https://youtu.be/FBh8ahDa04Y


https://youtu.be/jzDC3iKbTzY


https://youtu.be/JTVUA-jJ11I



But, you know, your gas powered car, with it's emission controls and catalytic converter is the cause of the impact... not the massive fires and explosions that release more chemicals into the atmosphere than any city could produce on their own... and you're supposed to "take the blame" without question, and fork over money to various governments and organizations to "fight climate change"... the same way people brought their livestock as offerings to appease the gods for "good weather".

Did you know that every rocket sent into space burns approximately 11,000 pounds of fuel per second, roughly 2 million times the amount burned by the average car? Did you know that in 2022 the world sent a record number of almost 2200 rockets into space?

29-May-2023 20:24:12

Origin Nexus

Origin Nexus

Posts: 322 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Tenebri said :
Origin Nexus said :
Tenebri said :
XSlay4DeathX said :
Tenebri said :
Origin Nexus said :
Tenebri said :
does that mean its not happening though? no of course not.

https://www.usgs.gov/centers/norock/science/status-glaciers-glacier-national-park
So, in 2020 they had to remove the signs saying all the glaciers will be gone by 2020, and your rebuttal is an article from 2016? Do you see the issue with that?


It also seems like you didn't actually read the article, otherwise you might realize WHY these glaciers have been melting for the last 100 years...

Original message details are unavailable.
These glaciers grew substantially during the Little Ice Age (LIA) that began around 1400 AD and reached their maximum size around 1850 AD.


yep and there is a cycle. they are now melting. which we are speeding up. as stated with many links through out this thread

just because they arent completely gone now. doesnt mean it was a lie lol


it's speeding up because of less cooling, take 2 ice coolers, the one with more ice will melt slower :P

Which means less ice, faster melt, which will speed up


and why is there less ice?

Why is there less ice in the spring time than the middle of winter?


so with this the ice should replenish each winter.
but its not

why is that?
Weird, because it snows and ice is formed around here every winter.


Are you asking why the glaciers aren't rebuilding themselves the same way they did during the ice ages?

29-May-2023 20:26:44

Joel
Feb
fmod Member
2005

Joel

Forum Moderator Posts: 32,973 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
XSlay4DeathX said :
^you can't call anything efficient if you use modern slavery tbh, highly offensive to me.
In terms of "efficiency", I am very specifically referring to the efficiency of different energy sources that vehicles use, power generation etc. Not the use of human involvement in that.

We can all agree the exploitation of people is abhorrent. I would love to see ways in which we can still transition to more renewable and sustainable sources of energy and transportation without such exploitation.

I love the fact that there's companies now entering the space of battery recycling because it means the already extracted materials can be recycled and repurposes rather than needlessly thrown away increasing even more demand for NEW materials.
Joel

Need support? Support Centre | Forum Help

29-May-2023 20:27:03 - Last edited on 29-May-2023 20:27:23 by Joel

XSlay4DeathX
Mar Member 2007

XSlay4DeathX

Posts: 2,634 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Joel said :
^ I'm not condoning the methods in which people are being exploited in the mining industry for battery materials, don't get me wrong. That needs addressing 100%.

That however is a separate topic and separate debate.


I know, just bringing awareness to it. batteries will only serve at most 20% of the globe, rest is gas.

I think the power grid would blow at even 50%

29-May-2023 20:28:15

Joel
Feb
fmod Member
2005

Joel

Forum Moderator Posts: 32,973 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Origin Nexus said :
Joel said :
Do you believe (as almost all climate scientists do) that the climate change is a thing and we've had a part to play in that?
You mean climate scientists like Dr. Mickey Mouse?

Stop claiming that "almost all climate scientists agree" when it's not true. That's just a narrative being pushed by climate alarmists. Even NASA's own award winning climate scientists have stated that "there is no climate emergency".
So we should just carry on as 'normal'/status-quo? Keep up with the burning of fossil fuels despite technology allowing us to progress away from that? Keep doing exactly what we're doing with no concern for the climate and extreme whether events as a result?

Is that the argument? There's no emergency so we don't need to worry and don't need to do anything?
Joel

Need support? Support Centre | Forum Help

29-May-2023 20:31:21

XSlay4DeathX
Mar Member 2007

XSlay4DeathX

Posts: 2,634 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Joel said :
XSlay4DeathX said :
^you can't call anything efficient if you use modern slavery tbh, highly offensive to me.
In terms of "efficiency", I am very specifically referring to the efficiency of different energy sources that vehicles use, power generation etc. Not the use of human involvement in that.

We can all agree the exploitation of people is abhorrent. I would love to see ways in which we can still transition to more renewable and sustainable sources of energy and transportation without such exploitation.

I love the fact that there's companies now entering the space of battery recycling
because it means the already extracted materials can be recycled and repurposes rather than needlessly thrown away increasing even more demand for NEW materials.


Well that's good if it's true, trust is sadly broken these days.

29-May-2023 20:32:43

Origin Nexus

Origin Nexus

Posts: 322 Silver Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Joel said :
The amount of energy that hits the earth from the sun alone each day is staggering, even if we can capture a fraction of that in addition to hydro, wind, nuclear etc.
Why aren't solar panel manufacturing plants solar powered? Is it because it takes more energy to produce solar panels than the solar panels will ever produce on their own? Solar panels are not "green energy" any more than batteries are "green energy". They're just a means of storing energy for later use, and ultimately, the amount of energy they will produce is far less than the energy it takes to produce them.

Wind farms are the same way. Imagine having to power a wind farm with diesel generators... sounds like a conspiracy theory... yet, Scotland just got caught having to power their wind turbines with diesel generators... not to mention all the other environmental damage that the wind farm was causing...


Joel said :
So we should just carry on as 'normal'/status-quo? Keep up with the burning of fossil fuels despite technology allowing us to progress away from that?
What technology?



Joel said :
Is that the argument? There's no emergency so we don't need to worry and don't need to do anything?
There's no emergency, it's all about money. It always has been, since the dawn of "sacrifice your livestock to appease the weather gods". What do you think happened to those animal sacrifices at the end of the day? Oh, that's right, those who organized the sacrifices took the dead animals home for food. And the gold that offered as a sacrifice was melted down and resold for profit.

It's always been about the money, and it will continue to be about the money. The goal is to place the blame on the general public so that they can solicit for donations and steal money though taxes. Has anyone explained what happens with your "carbon tax" money?

29-May-2023 20:35:39 - Last edited on 29-May-2023 20:42:32 by Origin Nexus

Quick find code: 23-24-60-62485114 Back to Top