Forums
Epidemics, Pandemics, Outbreak
Quick find code: 23-24-581-66177526
Icy Spring
said
:
NexOrigin said :
For example:
Nov 14th - 7,321 new cases
Nov 15th - 499 new cases
Nov 16th - 12,651 new cases
Nov 17th - 7,893 new cases
Nov 18th - 6,105 new cases
Nov 19th - 7,855 new cases
Nov 20th - 10,225 new cases
Nov 21st - 7,557 new cases
Nov 22nd - 655 new cases
Nov 23rd - 11,390 new cases
Now 24th - 6,853 new cases
Nov 25th - 2,976 new cases
Nov 26th - 209 new cases
Nov 27th - 16,680 new cases
Nov 28th - 8,257 new cases
Nov 29th - 317 new cases
Nov 30th - 10,768 new cases
Notice a pattern? There's a drastic dip the day before the high spikes. They're withholding case numbers overnight in order to pad the numbers to manipulate the data into appearing that there are far more daily cases happening than what is actually happening.
Yes, I do notice a pattern.
Nov 15th - 499 new cases (Sunday)
Nov 22nd - 655 new cases (Sunday)
Nov 29th - 317 new cases (Sunday)
It's an example of the "weekend effect" which shows test results are less likely to come back on Sunday. Exactly, and yet, they still present the numbers as though they are spiking up thousands more than they actually are. It's a false narrative. The media still runs with these numbers. You know the 16,000 new cases on Nov 27th isn't accurate. I know it isn't accurate. But, does the average person? No, because the media pushes this narrative that these are actual new cases for that day, when in reality, it's half that amount, or less. I'm better than you, but that doesn't mean you're not great!
NexOrigin said :
For example:
Nov 14th - 7,321 new cases
Nov 15th - 499 new cases
Nov 16th - 12,651 new cases
Nov 17th - 7,893 new cases
Nov 18th - 6,105 new cases
Nov 19th - 7,855 new cases
Nov 20th - 10,225 new cases
Nov 21st - 7,557 new cases
Nov 22nd - 655 new cases
Nov 23rd - 11,390 new cases
Now 24th - 6,853 new cases
Nov 25th - 2,976 new cases
Nov 26th - 209 new cases
Nov 27th - 16,680 new cases
Nov 28th - 8,257 new cases
Nov 29th - 317 new cases
Nov 30th - 10,768 new cases
Notice a pattern? There's a drastic dip the day before the high spikes. They're withholding case numbers overnight in order to pad the numbers to manipulate the data into appearing that there are far more daily cases happening than what is actually happening.
Yes, I do notice a pattern.
Nov 15th - 499 new cases (Sunday)
Nov 22nd - 655 new cases (Sunday)
Nov 29th - 317 new cases (Sunday)
It's an example of the "weekend effect" which shows test results are less likely to come back on Sunday. Exactly, and yet, they still present the numbers as though they are spiking up thousands more than they actually are. It's a false narrative. The media still runs with these numbers. You know the 16,000 new cases on Nov 27th isn't accurate. I know it isn't accurate. But, does the average person? No, because the media pushes this narrative that these are actual new cases for that day, when in reality, it's half that amount, or less. I'm better than you, but that doesn't mean you're not great!
31-Dec-2020 00:37:48
I'm not sure how to interpret this:
Original message details are unavailable.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a significant disruption to recruitment activity within the NHS. This is apparent from the significantly lower reported advertised vacancies between March and June 2020 as the NHS was fully focused on dealing with the pandemic. Whilst pressures of the pandemic eased somewhat over the summer months, it is still apparent from the data that recruitment activity for the NHS remains disrupted.
If they were reporting less vacancies in NHS positions... doesn't that mean... there were more doctors and nurses being recruited? I'm better than you, but that doesn't mean you're not great!
Original message details are unavailable.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a significant disruption to recruitment activity within the NHS. This is apparent from the significantly lower reported advertised vacancies between March and June 2020 as the NHS was fully focused on dealing with the pandemic. Whilst pressures of the pandemic eased somewhat over the summer months, it is still apparent from the data that recruitment activity for the NHS remains disrupted.
https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/nhs-vacancies-survey/april-2015---september-2020
If they were reporting less vacancies in NHS positions... doesn't that mean... there were more doctors and nurses being recruited? I'm better than you, but that doesn't mean you're not great!
31-Dec-2020 00:52:17 - Last edited on 31-Dec-2020 00:55:03 by NexOrigin
Averia Light
said
:
Yeah I'm not going to look at huge datasets on my phone, so I will postpone my response until I am on a computer. I don't blame you. I can bare read the data tables on a 50" screen. There's no way I'd do it on a phone. lol I'm better than you, but that doesn't mean you're not great!
Yeah I'm not going to look at huge datasets on my phone, so I will postpone my response until I am on a computer. I don't blame you. I can bare read the data tables on a 50" screen. There's no way I'd do it on a phone. lol I'm better than you, but that doesn't mean you're not great!
31-Dec-2020 00:56:35
C a z
said
:
NexOrigin said :
I'm not sure how to interpret this:
Original message details are unavailable.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a significant disruption to recruitment activity within the NHS. This is apparent from the significantly lower reported advertised vacancies between March and June 2020 as the NHS was fully focused on dealing with the pandemic. Whilst pressures of the pandemic eased somewhat over the summer months, it is still apparent from the data that recruitment activity for the NHS remains disrupted.
If they were reporting less vacancies in NHS positions... doesn't that mean... there were more doctors and nurses being recruited?
NO! it means they were to busy dealing with patients to be able to try and recruit more staff Are you assuming that nurses and doctors are responsible for hiring new staff? That... doesn't seem accurate. I'm pretty sure the management deals with it, not the people dealing with patients. I'm better than you, but that doesn't mean you're not great!
NexOrigin said :
I'm not sure how to interpret this:
Original message details are unavailable.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a significant disruption to recruitment activity within the NHS. This is apparent from the significantly lower reported advertised vacancies between March and June 2020 as the NHS was fully focused on dealing with the pandemic. Whilst pressures of the pandemic eased somewhat over the summer months, it is still apparent from the data that recruitment activity for the NHS remains disrupted.
https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/nhs-vacancies-survey/april-2015---september-2020
If they were reporting less vacancies in NHS positions... doesn't that mean... there were more doctors and nurses being recruited?
NO! it means they were to busy dealing with patients to be able to try and recruit more staff Are you assuming that nurses and doctors are responsible for hiring new staff? That... doesn't seem accurate. I'm pretty sure the management deals with it, not the people dealing with patients. I'm better than you, but that doesn't mean you're not great!
31-Dec-2020 01:15:12
C a z
said
:
NexOrigin said :
C a z said :
NexOrigin said :
I'm not sure how to interpret this:
Original message details are unavailable.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a significant disruption to recruitment activity within the NHS. This is apparent from the significantly lower reported advertised vacancies between March and June 2020 as the NHS was fully focused on dealing with the pandemic. Whilst pressures of the pandemic eased somewhat over the summer months, it is still apparent from the data that recruitment activity for the NHS remains disrupted.
If they were reporting less vacancies in NHS positions... doesn't that mean... there were more doctors and nurses being recruited?
NO! it means they were to busy dealing with patients to be able to try and recruit more staff Are you assuming that nurses and doctors are responsible for hiring new staff? That... doesn't seem accurate. I'm pretty sure the management deals with it, not the people dealing with patients.
Are you assuming management dont deal with a full spectrum of issues? I'm sure they do, but, I'm pretty sure the management aren't dealing patients. Their job is to manage, not be doctors or nurses. They hire people to be doctors and nurses. I'm better than you, but that doesn't mean you're not great!
NexOrigin said :
C a z said :
NexOrigin said :
I'm not sure how to interpret this:
Original message details are unavailable.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a significant disruption to recruitment activity within the NHS. This is apparent from the significantly lower reported advertised vacancies between March and June 2020 as the NHS was fully focused on dealing with the pandemic. Whilst pressures of the pandemic eased somewhat over the summer months, it is still apparent from the data that recruitment activity for the NHS remains disrupted.
https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/nhs-vacancies-survey/april-2015---september-2020
If they were reporting less vacancies in NHS positions... doesn't that mean... there were more doctors and nurses being recruited?
NO! it means they were to busy dealing with patients to be able to try and recruit more staff Are you assuming that nurses and doctors are responsible for hiring new staff? That... doesn't seem accurate. I'm pretty sure the management deals with it, not the people dealing with patients.
Are you assuming management dont deal with a full spectrum of issues? I'm sure they do, but, I'm pretty sure the management aren't dealing patients. Their job is to manage, not be doctors or nurses. They hire people to be doctors and nurses. I'm better than you, but that doesn't mean you're not great!
31-Dec-2020 01:22:31
Quick find code: 23-24-581-66177526 Back to Top