Forums

Epidemics, Pandemics, Outbreak

Quick find code: 23-24-581-66177526

NexOrigin

NexOrigin

Posts: 2,592 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Megycal said :
And this is why everyone should wear masks, jic. If someone cannot wear a mask for medical reasons then they could try and wear one of those transparent face shields which, although not as good, will help a bit
edit to add: I say try and wear one because there are various types and some don't look very comfortable
How often do you spit into someone's mouth or eyes?

How often do other people spit into your mouth or eyes?
I'm better than you, but that doesn't mean you're not great! :)

17-Feb-2021 14:09:53

Jenesiis
Jan Member 2018

Jenesiis

Posts: 1,200 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
NexOrigin said :
Megycal said :
And this is why everyone should wear masks, jic. If someone cannot wear a mask for medical reasons then they could try and wear one of those transparent face shields which, although not as good, will help a bit
edit to add: I say try and wear one because there are various types and some don't look very comfortable
How often do you spit into someone's mouth or eyes?

How often do other people spit into your mouth or eyes?


1) Every time you cough or sneeze near to someone else when you are not wearing facial protection

2) Every time someone else near to you coughs and sneezes without wearing facial protection

17-Feb-2021 14:37:59

NexOrigin

NexOrigin

Posts: 2,592 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Jenesiis said :
NexOrigin said :
Megycal said :
And this is why everyone should wear masks, jic. If someone cannot wear a mask for medical reasons then they could try and wear one of those transparent face shields which, although not as good, will help a bit
edit to add: I say try and wear one because there are various types and some don't look very comfortable
How often do you spit into someone's mouth or eyes?

How often do other people spit into your mouth or eyes?


1) Every time you cough or sneeze near to someone else when you are not wearing facial protection

2) Every time someone else near to you coughs and sneezes without wearing facial protection
So why does everyone have to wear a mask then?

You're supposed to sneeze or cough into your elbow, or a tissue, etc.

Shouldn't tissues and elbows be mandatory instead of masks?


And how does asymptomatic transmission work then? They're not coughing or sneezing, as they have no symptoms. So how are they spreading the virus?


At some point, the general public is going to have to accept the science, and accept the fact that aerosolized transmission is probably the primary source of transmission. If masks worked, the mask mandates would be stopping the spread. But they don't. They might help slow it down a bit, preventing someone from spitting into your mouth or eyes, but, in the end, the virus is going to make out of that mask as an aerosolized vapor, and can float in the air for hours.

This is why the whole "I protect you, you protect me" ideology doesn't work. This is why I have repeatedly promoted those who are in high risk categories take the steps to protect themselves, not others. Don't rely on others to protect you. Protect yourself. Get proper masks that actually work, such as N95 or equivalent and don't forget to protect your eyes.
I'm better than you, but that doesn't mean you're not great! :)

17-Feb-2021 14:48:18

Joel
Feb
fmod Member
2005

Joel

Forum Moderator Posts: 32,973 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
NexOrigin said :
So long as there are numbers that can be used to justify restrictions, there will be restrictions. Even if those numbers aren't accurate or have been manipulated.
Yes, but when I asked you the question, I worded it very specifically. I asked you, past the point at which vaccines achieve what they aim to achieve, do you think we'll continue to see lockdowns? Not now, not in a few months, but after a time when lets say 90-100% of the population has been vaccinated.

Presumably, at this point in time (perhaps thats late 2021, perhaps its early 2022, remains to be seen), restrictions would ease or be lifted entirely, there'll come a point where the pandemic is no longer declared and then the obvious thing to assume is that these measures (specifically the lockdowns) will end. Or do you think, at this time, we'll still see lockdown measures, just because... I don't know... because of some other non-pandemic related reason? That's what I'm trying to draw out of you, purely based on how you've made your remarks appear on more than one occasion.
Joel

Need support? Support Centre | Forum Help

17-Feb-2021 15:05:16

Joel
Feb
fmod Member
2005

Joel

Forum Moderator Posts: 32,973 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
NexOrigin said :
That's the
same logic
that Quebec is using to
extend the curfew
. The curfew was in place, and the case numbers have dropped, so that means the curfew is working, therefore the curfew is being extended.

Don't you see the contradiction in logic between the two provinces?

One of them says "the cases have dropped, we're ending the restrictions" and the other says "the cases have dropped, we're extending the restrictions".

They can't both be right, and they can't both be based on science. One of them has to be wrong.

And then there's the question of "why" the case are dropping.

Less testing = less cases. "underestimating" due to "data migration" = less cases.
As I understand it, Ontario is testing less so that's a concern. A friend my mine had one of his employees test positive a few weeks back, so he took his entire Toronto office to get tested as a precaution. Test centre was pretty quiet, nurses were not doing too much and they were hesitant to test them since none had 'direct contact' with the person who tested positive in a certain time frame I believe the reasoning was. So that's worrying.

That aside, I don't follow Quebec news but having done a quick look of what the latest is there, numbers were dropping so now they're starting to relax certain restrictions and resorting to a regional approach, as is Ontario. Only difference is, curfew right now is being maintained for a while longer to discourage private home gatherings so it's hardly devoid of all logic.

Ontario never had a curfew so obviously that's not something we had to remove or relax. We're having measures specific to us relaxed while some are still being maintained for the time being.
Joel

Need support? Support Centre | Forum Help

17-Feb-2021 15:05:25

Miles Prower
Nov Member 2006

Miles Prower

Posts: 9,764 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
NexOrigin said :
They might help slow it down a bit


Congratulations on the epiphany.
Would note that this feels like déjà vu in the making for anybody considering entertaining the discussion about mask efficacy.

As for mandatory vaccination, I do feel this would just lead to further distrust. It should be strongly encouraged, but never forced.
Low on bank space? Click here .

17-Feb-2021 15:11:23 - Last edited on 17-Feb-2021 15:13:22 by Miles Prower

NexOrigin

NexOrigin

Posts: 2,592 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Joel said :
NexOrigin said :
So long as there are numbers that can be used to justify restrictions, there will be restrictions. Even if those numbers aren't accurate or have been manipulated.
Yes, but when I asked you the question, I worded it very specifically. I asked you, past the point at which vaccines achieve what they aim to achieve, do you think we'll continue to see lockdowns? Not now, not in a few months, but after a time when lets say 90-100% of the population has been vaccinated.
My answer remains exactly the same. It doesn't matter if you agree with my answer or not, or if it's not the answer to the loaded question that you were expecting, that is my answer, and that is how I feel.

Joel said :
Presumably, at this point in time (perhaps thats late 2021, perhaps its early 2022, remains to be seen), restrictions would ease or be lifted entirely, there'll come a point where the pandemic is no longer declared and then the obvious thing to assume is that these measures (specifically the lockdowns) will end. Or do you think, at this time, we'll still see lockdown measures, just because... I don't know... because of some other non-pandemic related reason? That's what I'm trying to draw out of you, purely based on how you've made your remarks appear on more than one occasion.
My answer STILL remains the same; So long as there are numbers that can be used to justify restrictions, there will be restrictions. Even if those numbers aren't accurate or have been manipulated.


Do you want to ask it a bunch of other ways? Maybe ask it as a multiple choice question? My answer will still be exactly the same.
I'm better than you, but that doesn't mean you're not great! :)

17-Feb-2021 15:13:44

NexOrigin

NexOrigin

Posts: 2,592 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Miles Prower said :
NexOrigin said :
They might help slow it down a bit


Congratulations on the epiphany.
Standing in front of a moving bus may slow down the bus a bit as well too. Everything is relative. Congratulations on your ignorance.
I'm better than you, but that doesn't mean you're not great! :)

17-Feb-2021 15:16:30 - Last edited on 17-Feb-2021 15:27:53 by NexOrigin

Quick find code: 23-24-581-66177526 Back to Top