Forums
Epidemics, Pandemics, Outbreak
Quick find code: 23-24-581-66177526
Miles Prower
said
:
And? I was talking about transmission, specifically:
"First indication of reduction in disease transmission of up to 67%"
"The analysis also showed the potential for the vaccine to reduce asymptomatic transmission of the virus, based on weekly swabs obtained from volunteers in the UK trial. The data showed that PCR positive readings were reduced by 67% (CI: 49%, 78%) after a single dose, and 50% (CI: 38% to 59%) after the two dose regimen, supporting a substantial impact on transmission of the virus."
True efficacy cannot be determined until the vaccine has been widely deployed. What is important for now is the finding from preliminary testing. I'm calling out the BS 100% claimed by Astrazeneca. And you agree with me. So what's the issue?
Literally in big black letters at the top the article:
Original message details are unavailable.
COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca confirms 100% protection against severe disease, hospitalisation and death in the primary analysis of Phase III trials
That's a complete BS claim. They're manipulating the general public into believing that if they get the vaccine, they will have 100% protection.
In reality, what's going to happen is that they'll start the counter at 100%, and slowly decrease the % as the data comes in from the general public.
This is one of those statements where they can claim "Ah, but technically, it's currently true, therefore it isn't misinformation", yet, it's entirely designed to mislead people.
It's manipulation. I'm better than you, but that doesn't mean you're not great!
And? I was talking about transmission, specifically:
"First indication of reduction in disease transmission of up to 67%"
"The analysis also showed the potential for the vaccine to reduce asymptomatic transmission of the virus, based on weekly swabs obtained from volunteers in the UK trial. The data showed that PCR positive readings were reduced by 67% (CI: 49%, 78%) after a single dose, and 50% (CI: 38% to 59%) after the two dose regimen, supporting a substantial impact on transmission of the virus."
True efficacy cannot be determined until the vaccine has been widely deployed. What is important for now is the finding from preliminary testing. I'm calling out the BS 100% claimed by Astrazeneca. And you agree with me. So what's the issue?
Literally in big black letters at the top the article:
Original message details are unavailable.
COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca confirms 100% protection against severe disease, hospitalisation and death in the primary analysis of Phase III trials
That's a complete BS claim. They're manipulating the general public into believing that if they get the vaccine, they will have 100% protection.
In reality, what's going to happen is that they'll start the counter at 100%, and slowly decrease the % as the data comes in from the general public.
This is one of those statements where they can claim "Ah, but technically, it's currently true, therefore it isn't misinformation", yet, it's entirely designed to mislead people.
It's manipulation. I'm better than you, but that doesn't mean you're not great!
04-Feb-2021 22:32:31
Why the US Government Has a Secret Chicken Stockpile
https://youtu.be/F0qD5argOHE
I'm better than you, but that doesn't mean you're not great!
04-Feb-2021 22:43:23
Quick find code: 23-24-581-66177526 Back to Top