@ Rob. Since you just had to go there...
There's nothing particularly unique about CLD's structure. And voting on ideas with a thumbs up or thumbs down response is simplistic. The more in-depth system of collaboration, analysis and compilation of ideas into concise and specific recommendations developed by CLC has a real chance for success.
And when another leader poses a question directed for a specific mod, it's laughable that you want to step in and speak for them. (For instance, I'm quite sure Mod Maz is capable of answering questions regarding the progress she made with the clan permission rewrite and would have done so if given some time and the opportunity.)
And sending threatening pms from throwaway accounts warning those who take part in CLC to "watch their backs" didn't do much to encourage using your discord either. Combine that with an election that was disorganized at best (and downright deceptive at worst) and there is no comparison of which is the best managed server.
My earlier post extolled the virtues and positive things that CLC offers. You've tried to sabotage CLC several times now, so don't be surprised when you get called out on it. It would really be for the best if you'd just realize and accept that some of us will never be comfortable fully participating in CLD given its history.
24-Nov-2017 01:42:14
- Last edited on
24-Nov-2017 01:43:30
by
Esploratore