Forums

Probation/Cooldown Update

Quick find code: 86-87-615-65718836

Lisaa
Jun Member 2014

Lisaa

Posts: 7,018 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
So, in summary:

-Jmods and players were overly stressed from the changes and negative feedback, resulting in extreme behavior and harsher punishment than would normally occur.

-The game rules state that these banned people should be able to re-obtain their access via a spare account.

-There are people that have been contributing to CLF and the community overall. Shouldn't their actions since being banned have some factor in allowing them to be unbanned? Recent actions are a better display of who a person is now, rather than actions from long ago.



You're now in a debate with the daughter of a lawyer, expect lots of logic, reasoning, and headaches X)
@Lisaa_RS - Followed by @Runescape
FashionScapers - a 9000+ Member Discord Community | https://discord.gg/fashionscape

17-Dec-2015 23:44:45 - Last edited on 17-Dec-2015 23:48:56 by Lisaa

DrBrokenBow

DrBrokenBow

Posts: 7,265 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Lisaa said :
So, in summary:
-There are people that have been contributing to CLF and the community overall. Shouldn't their actions since being banned have some factor in allowing them to be unbanned? Recent actions are a better display of who a person is now, rather than actions from long ago.


I don't know how many were banned after the comments, however there are 2 I believe should have their access reinstated that I know of. (Read below in the spoiler if you want to know who, without me clearly naming names).

However, we were banned due to some weird reason, something like flaming or abusive comments. This may mean those banned are not "related" to this, and so wouldn't be allowed back in.

I know we aren't meant to name names, but here we go to ensure things are clear:
J4ron should have access reinstated. Why? Because this was his first legitimate ban. He was banned before, but it was realized to be a mistake and he had his access reinstated.

I also believe Kentt should have his access reinstated. Whilst he posted a flaming video, he has since attempted to make amends - running 3 (soon to be 4) offsites, one of which will be specifically for us in the CLF (or so I'm told).


Anyone else that was banned and never reinstated should probably also be considered being allowed back in, as they were a valued part of the CLF community - posting regularaly, and often nice things. Just this update showed our true feelings for unwarranted updates. I would know, I also got banned.
MrBrokenBow - Former Leader and Founder of
Rebel Rising

Maxed on the 9th July 2017!

17-Dec-2015 23:56:19 - Last edited on 18-Dec-2015 00:45:21 by DrBrokenBow

Tigergal44

Tigergal44

Posts: 2,269 Mithril Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I support the call for reinstatement of those banned because they were passionate about the issue of the probation change. Now that we are reverting to something very close to what they were arguing for it is time to reflect on how things got out of hand back then.

Things were not perfect on either side but maybe it is time to declare an amnesty.

18-Dec-2015 08:43:27

Mod Matthe

Mod Matthe

Jagex Moderator Forum Profile Posts by user
This is not an issue subject to discussion - access to the CLF is a privilege and like any forum sanctions CLF removal means that using another alt account to circumvent the sanction is not allowed.

In this case the actions of those involved were considered serious enough to remove them from the CLF entirely. In one case it was certainly not the first offence and in both cases there were substantial supporting evidences considered.

This has already been discussed multiple times by the CLF, not least because one of those banned has continued to attempt to have their ban overturned. I am aware that in one case the individual has made significant efforts around CLF related materials and I raised that in those discussions but the team's agreement remains that those permanently removed from the CLF will not have access returned.
Mod MattHe | Former Community Manager, now in Events & occasional Lore Monkey

18-Dec-2015 09:10:13

Pescao6
Aug Member 2007

Pescao6

Posts: 9,075 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Mod Matthe said :
Just a head up - after some internal discussions we are looking at making changes to this system

A nice touch. I like and support the planned changes. ^_^

Mod Matthe said :
access to the CLF is a privilege and like any forum sanctions CLF removal means that using another alt account to circumvent the sanction is not allowed.

That's an interesting piece of new information to me. I thought that according to the latest changes to the Ban Policy effective March 2015, if your non-exclusive, non-transferable, personal, limited licensed account was banned, Jagex gave the user the opportunity to start fresh with a new account. This being Jagex's idea of a second chance. I mean I get the whole thing of special rules for special forums. But it makes me wonder if this also applies after someone pays Jagex the £10.00 requesting their personally identifiable information be removed from Jagex's records according to the Data Protection Policy effective November 2015. Then again this probably falls under Section 7 of the Terms & Conditions which says Jagex reserves the right to take whatever action they feel is appropriate because they can. :P

Mod Matthe said :
This has already been discussed multiple times by the CLF, not least because one of those banned has continued to attempt to have their ban overturned.

Imho I wish people were more forgiving because this is just a game. We get the same thing when people get banned from Clans. I understand the whole thing of keeping the undesirables out, but most people mature with time. And given admonishment, most learn from their past mistakes. #JustSaying ;)

Going to bed... see this is what happens when I stay up all night... blocks of text of nonsense. Merry Xmas Everyone! Lol
*
Pescao6
of
El Imperio Latino

Hola Noob! Klk? What's up?
~
Discord: Pescao6#0001

18-Dec-2015 11:49:26

DrBrokenBow

DrBrokenBow

Posts: 7,265 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I don't want to derail the thread too much, however can I please just point out the following Matthe:
I, along with others (who weren't banned) feel that bans were applied in an attempt to "cool down" the CLF when the probation was new, because a large majority were disagreeing. Those banned were campaigning the most for it's removal - at no point did we actually break any CLF rules.

As Lisaa and Pescao have stated, one of the things about CLF is that it's not considered circumventing the rules if they created an alternate account and requested access, so why can each individual banned not receive one warning and be reinstated?

I know who has continued to attempt to regain access, however he is continuing because he feels that those replying are themselves circumventing the true reason he was banned, and are mostly ignoring what he has to say with no true reason for the ban or reason to keep him unbanned. Whilst he has accepted he was banned before, he also claims that he was forgiven as it was a mistaken ban.

The other one that was banned has continued to make a positive impact within clans and within the community. Before he was banned he was a valued member of the CLF, and no doubt he still would be, if not more of a valued member.

A lot of people do feel that the bans were applied harshly, because of the amount campaigning against the probation update - and the 'ringleaders' - or the ones who were campaigning against it the most were the ones who were given the ban.

What do you have to lose by reinstating their access? If they truly are a disruptive member of the CLF, their ban can be reinstated and access denied for the foreseeable future.
MrBrokenBow - Former Leader and Founder of
Rebel Rising

Maxed on the 9th July 2017!

18-Dec-2015 11:54:43 - Last edited on 18-Dec-2015 11:55:47 by DrBrokenBow

Pescao6
Aug Member 2007

Pescao6

Posts: 9,075 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
DrBrokenBow said :
As Lisaa and Pescao have stated, one of the things about CLF is that it's not considered circumventing the rules if they created an alternate account and requested access, so why can each individual banned not receive one warning and be reinstated?

Lol don't throw me under the bus like that. I kinda get the feeling Jagex interprets their rules however they want. At best we're left with the option to mail a complaint when rants are ignored, but Matthe already stated this isn't open for discussion. I'm just saying I wasn't aware of this CLF policy Matthe mentioned before today. And I've been here a looong time. But I don't know... Jagex seems to be changing their rules more often than usual which they can whenever they want to.

Anyway, if I learned anything from my latest interaction with Jagex is that according to the new Data Protection Policy effective November 2015, Jagex refrains from discussing other user's accounts with other players. So even if we feel that other people should be unbanned, that's apparently something between Jagex and the people who were banned.

But yeah I feel you... I kinda wish they were more forgiving too. :(
*
Pescao6
of
El Imperio Latino

Hola Noob! Klk? What's up?
~
Discord: Pescao6#0001

18-Dec-2015 12:09:25

Mod Matthe

Mod Matthe

Jagex Moderator Forum Profile Posts by user
Pescao6 said :


Mod Matthe said :
access to the CLF is a privilege and like any forum sanctions CLF removal means that using another alt account to circumvent the sanction is not allowed.

That's an interesting piece of new information to me. I thought that according to the latest changes to the Ban Policy effective March 2015, if your non-exclusive, non-transferable, personal, limited licensed account was banned, Jagex gave the user the opportunity to start fresh with a new account. This being Jagex's idea of a second chance. I mean I get the whole thing of special rules for special forums. But it makes me wonder if this also applies after someone pays Jagex the £10.00 requesting their personally identifiable information be removed from Jagex's records according to the Data Protection Policy effective November 2015. Then again this probably falls under Section 7 of the Terms & Conditions which says Jagex reserves the right to take whatever action they feel is appropriate because they can. :P


That is the case with forum bans yes - using an alternative account to bypass the sanctions on one of your accounts can result in further actions being taken against all associated accounts.

The data protection policy refers to personally identifiable information, not account identifiable information. These are not the same thing.

Pescao6 said :

Mod Matthe said :
This has already been discussed multiple times by the CLF, not least because one of those banned has continued to attempt to have their ban overturned.

Imho I wish people were more forgiving because this is just a game. We get the same thing when people get banned from Clans. I understand the whole thing of keeping the undesirables out, but most people mature with time. And given admonishment, most learn from their past mistakes. #JustSaying ;)


A permanent ban is a permanent ban, much like it is in game. If you act in such a way as to lose those privileges permanently then it is a permanent thing. How would you feel about it in relation to botting, spamming or RWT? We consider certain types of forum behaviour, especially in cases where it is persistent despite a series of warnings, unacceptable in the same way. And that can result in a permanent ban from the whole of the forums or removal of privileged access, as in these cases.
Mod MattHe | Former Community Manager, now in Events & occasional Lore Monkey

18-Dec-2015 12:18:27 - Last edited on 18-Dec-2015 12:20:10 by Mod Matthe

Mod Matthe

Mod Matthe

Jagex Moderator Forum Profile Posts by user
DrBrokenBow said :
I don't want to derail the thread too much, however can I please just point out the following Matthe:
I, along with others (who weren't banned) feel that bans were applied in an attempt to "cool down" the CLF when the probation was new, because a large majority were disagreeing. Those banned were campaigning the most for it's removal - at no point did we actually break any CLF rules.


Forum rules were broken and as such the action taken was in line with our moderation guidelines and was subject to the agreement of multiple JMods from the Community Team. The bans were not applied harshly and in fact were significantly less than the actions that could have been taken given the nature of some of the offences.

DrBrokenBow said :

What do you have to lose by reinstating their access? If they truly are a disruptive member of the CLF, their ban can be reinstated and access denied for the foreseeable future.


Please see my reply to
Pescao6
about permanent bans. Their access will not be reinstated and both have already been informed of such.
Mod MattHe | Former Community Manager, now in Events & occasional Lore Monkey

18-Dec-2015 12:25:04

Mod Matthe

Mod Matthe

Jagex Moderator Forum Profile Posts by user
Pescao6 said :
DrBrokenBow said :
As Lisaa and Pescao have stated, one of the things about CLF is that it's not considered circumventing the rules if they created an alternate account and requested access, so why can each individual banned not receive one warning and be reinstated?

Lol don't throw me under the bus like that. I kinda get the feeling Jagex interprets their rules however they want. At best we're left with the option to mail a complaint when rants are ignored, but Matthe already stated this isn't open for discussion. I'm just saying I wasn't aware of this CLF policy Matthe mentioned before today. And I've been here a looong time. But I don't know... Jagex seems to be changing their rules more often than usual which they can whenever they want to.

Anyway, if I learned anything from my latest interaction with Jagex is that according to the new Data Protection Policy effective November 2015, Jagex refrains from discussing other user's accounts with other players. So even if we feel that other people should be unbanned, that's apparently something between Jagex and the people who were banned.

But yeah I feel you... I kinda wish they were more forgiving too. :(


It is not a CLF rule. It is an overall forum rule and moderation policy.
Mod MattHe | Former Community Manager, now in Events & occasional Lore Monkey

18-Dec-2015 12:26:35

Quick find code: 86-87-615-65718836 Back to Top