I don't know what virtue signalling means. I don't know anyone in other sites, so I prefer to remain close to those I already know. OK, so you don't want me to post here about what I posted because this isn't the right place for it, but no-one has to respond to me. No, no-one has the need to hate crime, and denouncing evil and crime won't do anything for this subforum, though I can still do so; I have no issues with how anyone else posts. Yes, Muhammad is supremely more evil than Jesus, which does not matter here in any means.
Next post,
You're right, no-one else here is interested in condemning crime and evil here, due to this being a forum for something else. Thanks for understanding my correction there, sorry for not explaining that better at first, I will have to be more on-point next time. Yes, crime is different per country, and within corrupt governments, what is considered crime may not be evil.
Exactly my point. I felt the need to emphasize on going against evil as that feels like the right thing to do; I thought that users were just not caring, so I felt obligated to elaborate myself further to prevent misunderstandings, and I think that led to more misunderstandings, starting from an optional, irrelevant question I put for Lilli. But as I said earlier, I did not expect other people to get involved, I am accustomed to people not reading anything I type, as that's what often happens.
I hope I wasn't keeping you up late, I'd feel bad if you spent so long just to reply to me. Yes, understandably, no hard feelings anywhere, I think everyone behaved in a professional manner. As I said earlier, all discussion was done maturely and appropriately.
I am the opposite of pedantic, so I tend to ignore rules and do what I feel is right, I'm like Lilli. This behaviour led me to personally preventing two real-life r*pes, one almost happening in my own car, and that's what made me, me.
(*=a)
I am Pacific Time Zone, UTC-08:00.
01-Mar-2016 07:15:39