West,
Ah, yes, a clever person can win with devious means against a bigger foe, I forgot about that completely. A good point as always. Actually, there is one way a woman can beat a man easy: attack the balls, then scrape the eyes!
Interesting remark about the Maori, regarding squatting, that’s a good point, too. I never thought of that. Ah, yes, Dwarves, who can forget them?
Short people can be full of the biggest surprises! There are some little guys who are tough as nails.
NotFishing,
Ha! Indeed, strength is more important in archery than in swordfighting! One reason why the Welsh and English were such good longbowmen, was because they are strong enough to shoot longbows with a draw weight of well over a hundred pounds.
About dagger vs sword,
Yup, swords wins almost always against much shorter weapons; you can even attack the dagger-wielder’s legs and he can’t do anything about it. Unless the dagger is used up-close suddenly, or in assassination, or possibly thrown, does the dagger-wielder have a chance.
Gunslinger,
Oh my, someone who weighs 240 against a 160 pounder? That’s totally mean! Indeed, you’d toss the fella like a sack of potatoes. Bulk and mass help a lot indeed. Oh my, can you imagine actually having to fight a three-hundred pound linebacker? XD I guess I’d have to kick his knees out or something. Indeed, exceptional technique and talent can overcome strength; Ronda Rousey is exceptional. Yeah, I bet she did use supplements like that, but yeah, who can blame her? Ladies’ bodies can’t produce as much testosterone as men, so it’s understandable. Good points as always, I like talking about these subjects.
17-Jul-2018 07:20:46
- Last edited on
17-Jul-2018 07:22:08
by
Azi Demonica