In terms of inefficiency of revolvers and/or other firearms:
It mostly depends on the round being fired and at what velocity the firearm allows the bullet to build up to. Non-rifled barrels, such as what were found in early firearms, are fairly inaccurate and the projectiles are slower. However, musketballs/minie balls tend to be fairly large and if they hit the target, cause devastating damage, much like modern shotgun slug rounds. The velocity doesn't matter as much, other than affecting range.
EDIT: However, velocity does play a factor in whether or not a projectile fully expands when striking a target.
Rounds which are specifically made for penetration differ from those which are specifically made for stopping power. Polymer-tip and armor-piercing rounds tend to travel very long distances, very fast, and the projectile itself is hard and usually doesn't expand as much as other rounds when striking a target.
Rounds made for stopping power tend to expand when they hit a target, and possibly fragment once inside the target or upon hitting a hard surface. Such as soft-point or hollow-point rounds. Some rounds now are even made for causing hydrostatic shock, which is when the bullet displaces the water found in the human body to cause more organ damage.
So realistically, it depends on the size of the projectile, speed of the projectile, and range. Not necessarily the weapon itself. The weapon itself mostly tends to affect accuracy and range heaviest.
21-Dec-2017 21:09:45
- Last edited on
21-Dec-2017 21:11:47
by
Gunslinger Z