Cyun, though a poor defense, the only reason I opted for those lines being grouped was that they carry the most obvious metaphors. The rest of it, I think, is a bit of allusion or focused more on the non-leaf aspect.
It was, to an extent, a less than conscious choice.
---
Emperor Worf,
I wasn't sure how advanced or technical you wanted my feedback to be, so I just went with whatever came to mind at first. I hope this is what you wanted (and don't be alarmed if it is pedantic).
In the third line, "streaking her face" is a bit distracting with its separation by parenthetic comma. It is almost a subdivision that removed the reader from the final line. I also thought that the last verse in the first stanza wasn't as impactful as I would have liked. Perhaps to change the words so that they aren't as cliché?
She began to lose sense of that awful place
The message in this is a bit clearer, although the verbiage isn't as powerful as it could be. I'll leave the prolix to you.
The third line, again, in the second stanza is a break from the metro. I do like the last line, though perhaps a more illustrative word than sorrows? When I think of sorrows I think of deep but healing wounds of the past, not newly incurred torments.
I have trouble assigning emphasis in the second line of the third stanza. It also seems so rather simplistic for a poem of tragedy. The emphasis problem extends to the end of lines three and four, because Nature has an emphasis on the primary syllable whereas be sure is two independent syllables of unknown emphasis.
In terms of logic, the second line in the fourth stanza defeats the present idea of the poem: the girl is mourning because of her burden, and yet in the second line she has already borne it. Perhaps using forlorn and preserving the tense?
Yet Death's final call is no reason to mourn—
Others will help to move past the forlorn
23-Jun-2012 23:59:45
- Last edited on
24-Jun-2012 00:19:00
by
Yrolg