Forums
Patch Notes - 18/02
Quick find code: 442-443-8-66083345
Darkmaster_b
said
:
Evidently my sample size of 20k gem stones mined last week wasn't enough to convince some that a change had actually been made for the reason "20k isn't a good sample size". Glad to see a mod confirmed it. There is no longer a dearth of emerald and ruby from the priff gem rocks. Anyone could see that with even a little thought as it was immediately obvious as soon as I started mining today that something was changed compared to the 20k gems I mined last week.
Thank you Jagex for balancing these.
I have a feeling whoever said that was trolling you. I took my own samples of how it was and this was the result. You know the rates are messed up when the chance of Dragonstone is almost higher than the combined rates of Emeralds and Rubies
Evidently my sample size of 20k gem stones mined last week wasn't enough to convince some that a change had actually been made for the reason "20k isn't a good sample size". Glad to see a mod confirmed it. There is no longer a dearth of emerald and ruby from the priff gem rocks. Anyone could see that with even a little thought as it was immediately obvious as soon as I started mining today that something was changed compared to the 20k gems I mined last week.
Thank you Jagex for balancing these.
I have a feeling whoever said that was trolling you. I took my own samples of how it was and this was the result. You know the rates are messed up when the chance of Dragonstone is almost higher than the combined rates of Emeralds and Rubies
18-Feb-2019 17:51:25 - Last edited on 18-Feb-2019 17:55:39 by 777havoc
777havoc
said
:
Darkmaster_b said :
Evidently my sample size of 20k gem stones mined last week wasn't enough to convince some that a change had actually been made for the reason "20k isn't a good sample size". Glad to see a mod confirmed it. There is no longer a dearth of emerald and ruby from the priff gem rocks. Anyone could see that with even a little thought as it was immediately obvious as soon as I started mining today that something was changed compared to the 20k gems I mined last week.
Thank you Jagex for balancing these.
I have a feeling whoever said that was trolling you. I took my own samples of how it was and this was the result. You know the rates are messed up when the chance of Dragonstone is almost higher than the combined rates of Emeralds and Rubies
Fantastic pie chart. My sample size was actually a little larger than 20k. 22,009 to be exact. I also constructed a chart. The person must have been trolling as they were downright rude and insisting that I was "dumb and didn't know what I was talking about. Your sample of 20k is nothing compared to the millions mined by all players total. Patch notes didn't mention it. You're just wrong. Period"
Not only a fool for calling a data set of 22k insufficient but for insisting he was right no matter what data I had. That my data is just wrong. It feels good to see the egg on his face after Jagex confirmed what my data was showing. It was a delicious moment and he never said another word.
Pre- February 18, 2019 adjustment, Post Onyx Nerf.
Sapphire: 9816
Emerald: 1717
Ruby: 2443
Diamond: 5676
Dragonstone: 2288
Onyx: 69
Darkmaster_b said :
Evidently my sample size of 20k gem stones mined last week wasn't enough to convince some that a change had actually been made for the reason "20k isn't a good sample size". Glad to see a mod confirmed it. There is no longer a dearth of emerald and ruby from the priff gem rocks. Anyone could see that with even a little thought as it was immediately obvious as soon as I started mining today that something was changed compared to the 20k gems I mined last week.
Thank you Jagex for balancing these.
I have a feeling whoever said that was trolling you. I took my own samples of how it was and this was the result. You know the rates are messed up when the chance of Dragonstone is almost higher than the combined rates of Emeralds and Rubies
Fantastic pie chart. My sample size was actually a little larger than 20k. 22,009 to be exact. I also constructed a chart. The person must have been trolling as they were downright rude and insisting that I was "dumb and didn't know what I was talking about. Your sample of 20k is nothing compared to the millions mined by all players total. Patch notes didn't mention it. You're just wrong. Period"
Not only a fool for calling a data set of 22k insufficient but for insisting he was right no matter what data I had. That my data is just wrong. It feels good to see the egg on his face after Jagex confirmed what my data was showing. It was a delicious moment and he never said another word.
Pre- February 18, 2019 adjustment, Post Onyx Nerf.
Sapphire: 9816
Emerald: 1717
Ruby: 2443
Diamond: 5676
Dragonstone: 2288
Onyx: 69
18-Feb-2019 20:07:59
Darkmaster_b
said
:
777havoc said :
Darkmaster_b said :
Evidently my sample size of 20k gem stones mined last week wasn't enough to convince some that a change had actually been made for the reason "20k isn't a good sample size". Glad to see a mod confirmed it. There is no longer a dearth of emerald and ruby from the priff gem rocks. Anyone could see that with even a little thought as it was immediately obvious as soon as I started mining today that something was changed compared to the 20k gems I mined last week.
Thank you Jagex for balancing these.
I have a feeling whoever said that was trolling you. I took my own samples of how it was and this was the result. You know the rates are messed up when the chance of Dragonstone is almost higher than the combined rates of Emeralds and Rubies
Fantastic pie chart. My sample size was actually a little larger than 20k. 22,009 to be exact. I also constructed a chart. The person must have been trolling as they were downright rude and insisting that I was "dumb and didn't know what I was talking about. Your sample of 20k is nothing compared to the millions mined by all players total. Patch notes didn't mention it. You're just wrong. Period"
Not only a fool for calling a data set of 22k insufficient but for insisting he was right no matter what data I had. That my data is just wrong. It feels good to see the egg on his face after Jagex confirmed what my data was showing. It was a delicious moment and he never said another word.
Pre- February 18, 2019 adjustment, Post Onyx Nerf.
Sapphire: 9816
Emerald: 1717
Ruby: 2443
Diamond: 5676
Dragonstone: 2288
Onyx: 69
I made the information you gave me into another pie chart here is the result
Sapphire rates were definitely way too high, oddly your's shows the Diamond rates as a lot lower than mine though
777havoc said :
Darkmaster_b said :
Evidently my sample size of 20k gem stones mined last week wasn't enough to convince some that a change had actually been made for the reason "20k isn't a good sample size". Glad to see a mod confirmed it. There is no longer a dearth of emerald and ruby from the priff gem rocks. Anyone could see that with even a little thought as it was immediately obvious as soon as I started mining today that something was changed compared to the 20k gems I mined last week.
Thank you Jagex for balancing these.
I have a feeling whoever said that was trolling you. I took my own samples of how it was and this was the result. You know the rates are messed up when the chance of Dragonstone is almost higher than the combined rates of Emeralds and Rubies
Fantastic pie chart. My sample size was actually a little larger than 20k. 22,009 to be exact. I also constructed a chart. The person must have been trolling as they were downright rude and insisting that I was "dumb and didn't know what I was talking about. Your sample of 20k is nothing compared to the millions mined by all players total. Patch notes didn't mention it. You're just wrong. Period"
Not only a fool for calling a data set of 22k insufficient but for insisting he was right no matter what data I had. That my data is just wrong. It feels good to see the egg on his face after Jagex confirmed what my data was showing. It was a delicious moment and he never said another word.
Pre- February 18, 2019 adjustment, Post Onyx Nerf.
Sapphire: 9816
Emerald: 1717
Ruby: 2443
Diamond: 5676
Dragonstone: 2288
Onyx: 69
I made the information you gave me into another pie chart here is the result
Sapphire rates were definitely way too high, oddly your's shows the Diamond rates as a lot lower than mine though
18-Feb-2019 21:00:05 - Last edited on 18-Feb-2019 21:01:51 by 777havoc
Quick find code: 442-443-8-66083345 Back to Top