tldr: Please poll the Treasure Seekers. If a majority of Treasure Seekers want this, I think it's fine. Otherwise, please don't implement it just to please the non-clue relic majority.
I keep hearing the claim that people from both relic choices want this change. I don't think it's true. Almost no one I know who chose Treasure Seeker thinks this is a good change. Please consider polling Treasure Seekers to see if a majority actually approve. Because many of us feel that this is just a huge buff to the majority pick (Unnatural Selection) that is primarily geared towards the most competitive players (who care about the locked clue points).
We were told that large changes were not going to happen. We were specifically told that clues would not be area-locked and that that wouldn't change. As a result, a number of us chose treasure-seeker despite its apparent lack of slayer strength for the chance to complete clues at all. Not because we wanted to spend a full day zipping through all the clues, but because we wanted to complete some. That is why we chose the relic, not because it made it slightly faster to complete each clue or so we wouldn't have to leave (our now much more frustrating list of ) slayer tasks.
Relics have advantages and disadvantages. With the proposed change, you are just giving the main advantage of the treasure seeker relic (clue completability) to those who chose the other relic. This feels in spirit like changing the relics and is not something that should be done mid-leagues after most people have already chosen T4.
This change should be implemented in future leagues. It should not be implemented to give the strengths of both relics to the Unnatural Selection choosers after the fact, thus making Treasure Seeker, which had been a good choice, a terrible one.
Thank you for your hard work putting together this league. It is great already, and I hope we don't see too many more large changes.
11-Nov-2020 19:12:05
- Last edited on
11-Nov-2020 19:18:54
by
Tzidkiyahu