UrekMazino
said
:
Dilbert2001 said :
Apex Legends is only selling cosmetics now? Uh Oh! Somebody don't know what Apex Packs are then.
Uh oh! Did somebody say Apex Legends was doing poorly with their loot boxes and tried to "prove" it with a video but uh oh... it turned out they said their players were not overwhelmingly buying their SKINS?
Uh Oh! Fallout 76 was doing poorly when they only sold cosmetics without stats, that's why they also sell xp buffs on top of cosmetics with stats, better known as gear, in most other games. That's right, cosmetics without stats are doing poorly.
Bungie is already cutting back on anti-consumer practices? When are they cutting? They are cutting their scheduled updates. Uh Oh! Somebody is running out of money to pay their devs.
https://twitter.com/pcgamer/status/1142467453198512128
Because skins are the bulk of the revenue so saying its skins sales not doing well is equivalent to its sales in general not doing well. If a fruit parlor has poor fruit sales but its smoothies and yogurt are selling well, is the business really doing well?
One look at the replies to that PC gamer tweet about Bungie delaying content to tackle crunch shows generally positive reception towards the decision, lmao thanks for showing that Bungie is not only becoming more pro-consumer but also pro-game developers, thanks for making my point about Bungie leaving Activision being a good thing even better!
Where did EA show how much money they made from skins? Please show.
Why did Bungie have to delay projects instead of hiring more employees like Jagex if they can afford? Too bad, Jagex is rich thanks to MTX but Bungie is poor despite of not only not reducing any MTX as players claimed but also turning free content into DLC MTX.
Dilbert2001 said :
Apex Legends is only selling cosmetics now? Uh Oh! Somebody don't know what Apex Packs are then.
Uh oh! Did somebody say Apex Legends was doing poorly with their loot boxes and tried to "prove" it with a video but uh oh... it turned out they said their players were not overwhelmingly buying their SKINS?
Uh Oh! Fallout 76 was doing poorly when they only sold cosmetics without stats, that's why they also sell xp buffs on top of cosmetics with stats, better known as gear, in most other games. That's right, cosmetics without stats are doing poorly.
Bungie is already cutting back on anti-consumer practices? When are they cutting? They are cutting their scheduled updates. Uh Oh! Somebody is running out of money to pay their devs.
https://twitter.com/pcgamer/status/1142467453198512128
Because skins are the bulk of the revenue so saying its skins sales not doing well is equivalent to its sales in general not doing well. If a fruit parlor has poor fruit sales but its smoothies and yogurt are selling well, is the business really doing well?
One look at the replies to that PC gamer tweet about Bungie delaying content to tackle crunch shows generally positive reception towards the decision, lmao thanks for showing that Bungie is not only becoming more pro-consumer but also pro-game developers, thanks for making my point about Bungie leaving Activision being a good thing even better!
Where did EA show how much money they made from skins? Please show.
Why did Bungie have to delay projects instead of hiring more employees like Jagex if they can afford? Too bad, Jagex is rich thanks to MTX but Bungie is poor despite of not only not reducing any MTX as players claimed but also turning free content into DLC MTX.
27-Jun-2019 18:09:37
