Probably because I pay a lot of attention to news in the UK.
Would you like a list of scandals? They were criticised for their stance on lootboxes, but that is nothing compared what they let high street bookmakers get away with. I can dig up a list, just ask.
Firstly, I said allegations of corruption... As with every bit of rot in the UK government it is under a layer of polish. They let large companies get away with unethical and questionably legal practices (but as the regulatory authority they write the definitions, it is also their choice to pursue legal action... or not), but how do they benefit? I expect a parent company of a parent company of an investment company holding shares in a company (that profits from poorly-regulated gambling) in an invisible trust of a civil servant or ex-civil servant who just happens to work in...
Of course there is never any proof as trusts do not have to declare anything, least of all their trustees.
But I'm getting off topic.
You mean you cherrypick definitions from one of the few national gambling regulatory bodies that backed up your view. OK.
Also here is more recent statement from the UK Gambling Commission... and 15 others.
https://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/pdf/international-gaming-and-gambling-declaration-2018.pdf
Of course this "declaration" is nothing but hot air, but it seems they realised they cannot pretend lootboxes and similar are not gambling.
You'll get it when you deserve it.
15-Feb-2019 16:49:04