Forums
Fate of the Gods 2
Quick find code: 341-342-881-65796001
Maiden China
said
:
Lynxlynx said :
and the Chelon-Mah were finished off by Bilrach was, not were(it's a quote, not your fault, but it irks me
)
Not necessarily wrong. I think that the quote means that by sacrificing the last one, Bilrach finished the whole race. It is possible to interpret it that way if plural of Chelon-Mah is Chelon-Mah. After all plural of mahjarrat is mahjarrat. And judging by context the one we are quoting was talking about the whole races instead of single individuals and in that case it is right to say that "the Chelon-Mah were finished off by Bilrach" since by killing the last Chelon-Mah, all of the Chelon-Mah left were finished off by him.
NO
I do not ship ZamorakxZaros.
I follow them. And Marimbo, the best t5 god.
Lynxlynx said :
and the Chelon-Mah were finished off by Bilrach was, not were(it's a quote, not your fault, but it irks me
)
Not necessarily wrong. I think that the quote means that by sacrificing the last one, Bilrach finished the whole race. It is possible to interpret it that way if plural of Chelon-Mah is Chelon-Mah. After all plural of mahjarrat is mahjarrat. And judging by context the one we are quoting was talking about the whole races instead of single individuals and in that case it is right to say that "the Chelon-Mah were finished off by Bilrach" since by killing the last Chelon-Mah, all of the Chelon-Mah left were finished off by him.
NO
I do not ship ZamorakxZaros.
I follow them. And Marimbo, the best t5 god.
12-Aug-2016 16:05:27
ZAmorakZaros
said
:
Maiden China said :
Lynxlynx said :
and the Chelon-Mah were finished off by Bilrach was, not were(it's a quote, not your fault, but it irks me
)
Not necessarily wrong. I think that the quote means that by sacrificing the last one, Bilrach finished the whole race. It is possible to interpret it that way if plural of Chelon-Mah is Chelon-Mah. After all plural of mahjarrat is mahjarrat. And judging by context the one we are quoting was talking about the whole races instead of single individuals and in that case it is right to say that "the Chelon-Mah were finished off by Bilrach" since by killing the last Chelon-Mah, all of the Chelon-Mah left were finished off by him.
Great, that's solved. Can we get back on topic now?
Maiden China said :
Lynxlynx said :
and the Chelon-Mah were finished off by Bilrach was, not were(it's a quote, not your fault, but it irks me
)
Not necessarily wrong. I think that the quote means that by sacrificing the last one, Bilrach finished the whole race. It is possible to interpret it that way if plural of Chelon-Mah is Chelon-Mah. After all plural of mahjarrat is mahjarrat. And judging by context the one we are quoting was talking about the whole races instead of single individuals and in that case it is right to say that "the Chelon-Mah were finished off by Bilrach" since by killing the last Chelon-Mah, all of the Chelon-Mah left were finished off by him.
Great, that's solved. Can we get back on topic now?
Support Rite of Passage, a quest about the aviansie, their homeworld and Armadyl
Here
#teamblue
Oh dear... you lost The Game
12-Aug-2016 17:57:14 - Last edited on 12-Aug-2016 17:57:24 by Lynxlynx
Lynxlynx
said
:
ZAmorakZaros said :
Maiden China said :
Lynxlynx said :
and the Chelon-Mah were finished off by Bilrach was, not were(it's a quote, not your fault, but it irks me
)
Not necessarily wrong. I think that the quote means that by sacrificing the last one, Bilrach finished the whole race. It is possible to interpret it that way if plural of Chelon-Mah is Chelon-Mah. After all plural of mahjarrat is mahjarrat. And judging by context the one we are quoting was talking about the whole races instead of single individuals and in that case it is right to say that "the Chelon-Mah were finished off by Bilrach" since by killing the last Chelon-Mah, all of the Chelon-Mah left were finished off by him.
Great, that's solved. Can we get back on topic now?
It is relevant to FOTG2.
ZAmorakZaros said :
Maiden China said :
Lynxlynx said :
and the Chelon-Mah were finished off by Bilrach was, not were(it's a quote, not your fault, but it irks me
)
Not necessarily wrong. I think that the quote means that by sacrificing the last one, Bilrach finished the whole race. It is possible to interpret it that way if plural of Chelon-Mah is Chelon-Mah. After all plural of mahjarrat is mahjarrat. And judging by context the one we are quoting was talking about the whole races instead of single individuals and in that case it is right to say that "the Chelon-Mah were finished off by Bilrach" since by killing the last Chelon-Mah, all of the Chelon-Mah left were finished off by him.
Great, that's solved. Can we get back on topic now?
It is relevant to FOTG2.
Zarosian Lorehound
Master Questcape Owner
Inconsistent Completionist
12-Aug-2016 18:41:31
Zulkir
said
:
Lynxlynx said :
ZAmorakZaros said :
Maiden China said :
Lynxlynx said :
and the Chelon-Mah were finished off by Bilrach was, not were(it's a quote, not your fault, but it irks me
)
Not necessarily wrong. I think that the quote means that by sacrificing the last one, Bilrach finished the whole race. It is possible to interpret it that way if plural of Chelon-Mah is Chelon-Mah. After all plural of mahjarrat is mahjarrat. And judging by context the one we are quoting was talking about the whole races instead of single individuals and in that case it is right to say that "the Chelon-Mah were finished off by Bilrach" since by killing the last Chelon-Mah, all of the Chelon-Mah left were finished off by him.
Great, that's solved. Can we get back on topic now?
It is relevant to FOTG2.
Is it relevant if it should been have or has?
Lynxlynx said :
ZAmorakZaros said :
Maiden China said :
Lynxlynx said :
and the Chelon-Mah were finished off by Bilrach was, not were(it's a quote, not your fault, but it irks me
)
Not necessarily wrong. I think that the quote means that by sacrificing the last one, Bilrach finished the whole race. It is possible to interpret it that way if plural of Chelon-Mah is Chelon-Mah. After all plural of mahjarrat is mahjarrat. And judging by context the one we are quoting was talking about the whole races instead of single individuals and in that case it is right to say that "the Chelon-Mah were finished off by Bilrach" since by killing the last Chelon-Mah, all of the Chelon-Mah left were finished off by him.
Great, that's solved. Can we get back on topic now?
It is relevant to FOTG2.
Is it relevant if it should been have or has?
Support Rite of Passage, a quest about the aviansie, their homeworld and Armadyl
Here
#teamblue
Oh dear... you lost The Game
12-Aug-2016 19:08:32
Lynxlynx
said
:
From the February VIP Q&A:
Is there any conceivable situation in which Seren would work with Zaros?
Mod Osborne: Mah comes to mind. She's a primal force that would require both of them to stop, and they would likely be on the same side for that. Otherwise, they're somewhat opposed. One wants control, the other is disgusted by it.
I think we must expect Seren to appear.
Well, this suggests otherwise
From the February VIP Q&A:
Is there any conceivable situation in which Seren would work with Zaros?
Mod Osborne: Mah comes to mind. She's a primal force that would require both of them to stop, and they would likely be on the same side for that. Otherwise, they're somewhat opposed. One wants control, the other is disgusted by it.
I think we must expect Seren to appear.
Well, this suggests otherwise
Support Rite of Passage, a quest about the aviansie, their homeworld and Armadyl
Here
#teamblue
Oh dear... you lost The Game
12-Aug-2016 21:36:17
Lynxlynx
said
:
You are so.... so.... argh!
that I am
(hopefully you dont have any genuine dislike for me, that was not my intent)
Lynxlynx said :
Maybe Azzy just don't know where Wahisietel is, or doesn't have time to tell him Zaros is back, since he is tasked with finding the elder halls if that was the case, I doubt they'd put in dialogue for wahi. they want to tell us that azzy doesnt trust wahi... or something like that. The guy's like right in nardah like all the time, and it's not like azzy can't travel the distance... he can teleport and mahjarrat do have forms of longdistance communication as shows in moia's dungeoneering thing AesirWarrior said :
I don't know if they were ever considered formidable enemies. iIRC the only reason the mahjarrat feared them... Was because they looked scary. Wahi points out that in reality a creature with that body (which he at the time doesn't
believe exists, but the point still stands) would actually be really easy to defeat.
"As fearsome as it appears, it would actually be fairly easy to destroy. It is a terror of the mind, not of the flesh." I find it hard to believe a mahjarrat would be scared by something that 'looks scary'
'is scary' would scare them though. In runescape, a thing's looks doesn't necessarily reflect its power, you have all sorts of npcs that are either a lot more powerful than they look, a lot less, or simply look like they'd have no combat ability at all (like jellies or crawling hands) Carn
You are so.... so.... argh!
that I am
(hopefully you dont have any genuine dislike for me, that was not my intent)
Lynxlynx said :
Maybe Azzy just don't know where Wahisietel is, or doesn't have time to tell him Zaros is back, since he is tasked with finding the elder halls if that was the case, I doubt they'd put in dialogue for wahi. they want to tell us that azzy doesnt trust wahi... or something like that. The guy's like right in nardah like all the time, and it's not like azzy can't travel the distance... he can teleport and mahjarrat do have forms of longdistance communication as shows in moia's dungeoneering thing AesirWarrior said :
I don't know if they were ever considered formidable enemies. iIRC the only reason the mahjarrat feared them... Was because they looked scary. Wahi points out that in reality a creature with that body (which he at the time doesn't
believe exists, but the point still stands) would actually be really easy to defeat.
"As fearsome as it appears, it would actually be fairly easy to destroy. It is a terror of the mind, not of the flesh." I find it hard to believe a mahjarrat would be scared by something that 'looks scary'
'is scary' would scare them though. In runescape, a thing's looks doesn't necessarily reflect its power, you have all sorts of npcs that are either a lot more powerful than they look, a lot less, or simply look like they'd have no combat ability at all (like jellies or crawling hands) Carn
13-Aug-2016 05:47:24 - Last edited on 13-Aug-2016 05:52:15 by Maiden China
Quick find code: 341-342-881-65796001 Back to Top