First off lets take a look at Garlandia's character, first off she willingly attended this banquet with Saradomin despite her views on the war and on gods in general a distasteful act of not only outright defiance/aggressiveness but also one of pride and vanity these defining traits of hers are further confirmed when she say's
"He demanded that we fight for him"
rather than seeing the reasons for the war and the need to fight for the greater good she only sees someone undermining her own selfish sense of authority and self-importance like a spoilt child throwing a tantrum after being told to tidy their room. She then states
"I used to be a noble being, with wings that were the
envy of everyone
"
again empathising on her own vanity being attacked rather than any percived greater wrong doings. surely such a pitiful and vile creature is not to be sided with?
Now lets look at Saradomins reaction, sure if we ignore the details then the act alone could indeed be accurately named as savage and barbaric but what would the cost be if he had not acted at all. To allow dissidence would of been a far greater evil as it would of led to doubt and doubt to fear, from there voices of anger and distrust would of divided the Icyene with the Dissidents succumbing to mob mentallity to assert themselves over their percived "oppressors" and the Loyalists doing much the same untill eventually civil war prevails as order collapses into chaos costing the lives of countless innocents. So did Saradomin wrong Garlandia? yes, did he act selfishly or barbarically? no he did as he has always done, as he has always claimed to act, he "bloodied his own hands so that others would not have to" he took responsibillity for the citizens of both New Domina and Glienor and put the greater good before all else, he used wisdom to preserve order.
12-Dec-2013 15:49:55