forums.rs

Forums

Potential Acquisition - Update Thread is locked

Quick find code: 294-295-346-65774421

of 166
Dilbert2001
Jun Member 2006

Dilbert2001

Posts: 30,168 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
I already posted the FACTS, and I was the FIRST and ONLY ONE who brought the FACTS to this forum No you weren't, and no you aren't. You didn't even join this discussion until there were already 63 pages already posted. And you didn't post anything on the previous thread. There were countless people digging up and posting facts before you even joined the discussion.

I post FACTS on THIS thread. I don't go over all the threads in all the forums, so if they were there, fine, I might not be the first one who brought the FACTS up, but it doesn't mean they are not FACTS.

If you have seen the same FACTS posted on other places, then you should have known the FACT is EVERY current Jagex shareholder has agreed to sell all their shares when they get the $100 million payment. Why did you still make up things like Ted's refusal to sell his stakes?

From NexusOrigin, posted on page 101 of this thread:

"Mod Balance never stated there were multiple bidders, only that there were multiple offers. Those offers could have all come from the same company. And the deal still hasn't gone through. If the purchase agreement is for 100% of the shares, and one of the shareholders decides they don't want to sell, the deal falls through. If Constant decides he doesn't want to sell his shares, no one can force him to."

01-Apr-2016 03:17:05 - Last edited on 01-Apr-2016 03:27:40 by Dilbert2001

Nexus Origin

Nexus Origin

Posts: 21,010 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
I already posted the FACTS, and I was the FIRST and ONLY ONE who brought the FACTS to this forum No you weren't, and no you aren't. You didn't even join this discussion until there were already 63 pages already posted. And you didn't post anything on the previous thread. There were countless people digging up and posting facts before you even joined the discussion.

I post FACTS on THIS thread. I don't go over all the threads in all the forums, so if they were there, fine, I might not be the first one who brought the FACTS up, but it doesn't mean they are not FACTS. You claimed to be the first and only person to have posted facts on the forums. And you didn't need to go all over the forums, the other official announcement about this is just below this thread, stickied (and now locked).

Original message details are unavailable.
If you have seen the same FACTS posted on other places, then you should have known the FACT is EVERY current Jagex shareholder has agreed to sell all their shares when they get the $100 million payment. Why did you still make up things like Ted's refusal to sell his stakes?

From NexusOrigin, posted on page 101 of this thread:

"Mod Balance never stated there were multiple bidders, only that there were multiple offers. Those offers could have all come from the same company. And the deal still hasn't gone through. If the purchase agreement is for 100% of the shares, and one of the shareholders decides they don't want to sell, the deal falls through. If Constant decides he doesn't want to sell his shares, no one can force him to." 1. I never stated Constant refused, I used him as an example of a shareholder holding a very small amount of shares, whom could hold up the entire sale of the company by refusing to sell his shares.
_
_
_
_
_________
m
_________
_
_
_
_

McDelivery Now Available In Canada

McDonalds
-
I'm lovin' it.

01-Apr-2016 03:36:49

Dilbert2001
Jun Member 2006

Dilbert2001

Posts: 30,168 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
(1) I know Ted was an example. But you said somewhere the fact that all sharesholders have agreed to sell before my posts and you knew it. It contradicted your arguments around page 95-105 that some the deal might fail because some Jagex shareholders might not apporve it. Note that you also went on to argue with another poster on the 51% ownership rule.

(2) Official statement from the agreement can be obtained from the Chinese stock exchanges, and it was also reported by several major Chinese media. Even if you say you did not know it, that's OK. Then please just admit it I did the community the favor of bringing the PLAIN TRUTH to them and you too.

01-Apr-2016 03:43:52 - Last edited on 01-Apr-2016 03:49:15 by Dilbert2001

Nexus Origin

Nexus Origin

Posts: 21,010 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
I know Ted was an example. But you said somewhere the fact that all sharesholders have agreed to sell before my posts and you knew it. It contradicted your arguments around page 95-105 that some the deal might fail because some Jagex shareholders might not apporve it. Note that you also went on to argue with another poster on the 51% ownership rule. Can you please quote those posts in which I made such statements?
_
_
_
_
_________
m
_________
_
_
_
_

McDelivery Now Available In Canada

McDonalds
-
I'm lovin' it.

01-Apr-2016 03:46:54

Dilbert2001
Jun Member 2006

Dilbert2001

Posts: 30,168 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
Original message details are unavailable.
I know Ted was an example. But you said somewhere the fact that all sharesholders have agreed to sell before my posts and you knew it. It contradicted your arguments around page 95-105 that some the deal might fail because some Jagex shareholders might not apporve it. Note that you also went on to argue with another poster on the 51% ownership rule. Can you please quote those posts in which I made such statements?

Told you around page 100... Examples:

"...However, since there was only one share in the company when it founded in 2001 (Andrew held the 1 share until 2002 when it was split between himself, Paul and Constant), it is highly doubtful that there were any shareholder agreements made, thus, any shares in the company are private property, and cannot be forced to sell, regardless if 99% of the shareholders want to sell."

"While a "drag-along" agreement is there to protect the majority shareholders, a "tag-along" agreement is there to protect the minority shareholders. Both parties can be protected by a shareholder agreement, however, without any shareholder agreements, all shares in a company are private property, and no one can force the sale of any of them."

01-Apr-2016 03:56:22

Nexus Origin

Nexus Origin

Posts: 21,010 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Right, that was the part where I was explaining how shareholder agreements can affect the outcome of a sale, so, what am I contradicting here? Or where I have stated any incorrect facts about the potential deal?
_
_
_
_
_________
m
_________
_
_
_
_

McDelivery Now Available In Canada

McDonalds
-
I'm lovin' it.

01-Apr-2016 03:59:00

Dilbert2001
Jun Member 2006

Dilbert2001

Posts: 30,168 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Original message details are unavailable.
Right, that was the part where I was explaining how shareholder agreements can affect the outcome of a sale, so, what am I contradicting here? Or where I have stated any incorrect facts about the potential deal?

"... it is highly doubtful that there were any shareholder agreements made,"

Thing like that... You said you were highly doubtful there were any shareholder agreements made then, but you told us you have seen posts before mine that a shareholder agreement has already been made now.

In any event, it still doesn't change the fact that I found out the true fact of the agreement for you even if you did not see them prior to my posts.

01-Apr-2016 04:03:16 - Last edited on 01-Apr-2016 04:04:48 by Dilbert2001

Quick find code: 294-295-346-65774421 Back to Top