Mystic--
As one who appreciates irony/sarcasm I enjoyed your recent post employing it to great effect (no sarcasm intended).
My objection to unlimited trade is entirely botting related, not at all merchanting related, though I have said that IF unlimiting trade stops price manipulators I will be very happy.
My objection to the old wildy portion is entirely related to being forced to associate with the largely antisocial class of players attracted to it. And I see you have, less judgementally perhaps, expressed similar views of PKers in posts after I gave up on this thread. I have said that if everything us non-virtual-murderers need to play the game is moved out of the wild, I have no strong objection to that portion of the plan. Though in that case, it seems simpler to just make PVP worlds follow old wildy rules, as many have suggested.
And, as has been restated recently, if they had simply said, "we're bringing back old wild and free trade" I would have still had the previously stated objections, but they would have eliminated any option for me to "rant," as you imply, about the votes. I simply resent being scammed and lied to. As a reasonable person I have to believe if you considered our stated objections to the methodologies used in the two votes, you would have to conclude they were designed to produce a desired result. If 51% voted "yes" then fine; "yes" wins. But just don't insult our intelligence by claiming that 91% of players want PKing and increased botting, as many supporters and seemingly Jagex do.
As I and others pointed out, isn't it interesting how the poll archives disappeared just when it would be handy to point out the old poll results showing how few people enjoyed PKing?
18-Jan-2011 18:48:01