Forums
-x- The Antikingdom -x-
Quick find code: 237-238-917-65779340
DMMetalaane
said
:
I'd say that begrudged and forced cooperation is better than what we have now.
because that's fun for both parties right guys
I'd say that begrudged and forced cooperation is better than what we have now.
because that's fun for both parties right guys
20-Apr-2016 21:28:24
DMMetalaane
said
:
poop in pant said :
DMMetalaane said :
I'd say that begrudged and forced cooperation is better than what we have now.
because that's fun for both parties right guys
If anything at all - I'd think so. I hold to the belief that this is a shared theatrical stage. Maybe you're right, maybe it wouldn't be fun for those who aren't interested in getting along. If this were the way things went though, and it didn't change, they'd then just go somewhere else because they wouldn't like it.
I'm saying it's not fun for both parties. If you have an idea or whatever you're forcing onto other groups and they're all really annoyed and uncomfortable with what you're making them do, both parties are going to have a bad time.
Say for example you're invading a small village, and your opponents really couldn't care less about fighting you and have told you they're not interested, because battles aren't something they're into. You're not going to enjoy yourself when fighting these people if you're forcing them into it, because they'll clearly be showing their disinterest and dismissal towards you. I know the thing that's said a lot of the time is "you're in the public domain you have to accept this" but that's never fun.
You could also argue that you have to be some special kind of cancer if you enjoy making people do what you want and not attempting compromise between both parties. If this is a "shared stage" as you say, you wouldn't make others deliberately uncomfortable for your own means.
Maybe what I'm saying isn't entirely relevant to this discussion, but w/e
poop in pant said :
DMMetalaane said :
I'd say that begrudged and forced cooperation is better than what we have now.
because that's fun for both parties right guys
If anything at all - I'd think so. I hold to the belief that this is a shared theatrical stage. Maybe you're right, maybe it wouldn't be fun for those who aren't interested in getting along. If this were the way things went though, and it didn't change, they'd then just go somewhere else because they wouldn't like it.
I'm saying it's not fun for both parties. If you have an idea or whatever you're forcing onto other groups and they're all really annoyed and uncomfortable with what you're making them do, both parties are going to have a bad time.
Say for example you're invading a small village, and your opponents really couldn't care less about fighting you and have told you they're not interested, because battles aren't something they're into. You're not going to enjoy yourself when fighting these people if you're forcing them into it, because they'll clearly be showing their disinterest and dismissal towards you. I know the thing that's said a lot of the time is "you're in the public domain you have to accept this" but that's never fun.
You could also argue that you have to be some special kind of cancer if you enjoy making people do what you want and not attempting compromise between both parties. If this is a "shared stage" as you say, you wouldn't make others deliberately uncomfortable for your own means.
Maybe what I'm saying isn't entirely relevant to this discussion, but w/e
20-Apr-2016 21:47:40
Quick find code: 237-238-917-65779340 Back to Top