Forums

Electric Car Chargers

Quick find code: 23-24-938-66191302

FiFi LaFeles

FiFi LaFeles

Posts: 24,106 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Even given the trickle-in figure of 2.8 million EV's in 10 years - that will place a strain on our generating power and distribution network. I honestly believe there's not a cat's chance in hell of getting everything in place and running smoothly in a 10 year span even for the puny 2.8 million who are in the position to afford to purchase a new EV.

Then, of course, you need to add on the existing and additional EVs that will be brought into circulation within that 10 years.

The biggest issue for me here is the time line, which the Govt seem to have dragged out of their arses with no notion of how they are going to achieve this either practically or financially - and then expecting everyone to clap their hands and dance with glee.

And the Green Brigade who wave around their Save the Planet nonsense whilst ignoring any and all practicalities surrounding this blinkered ideal and who, when confronted with the actual realities of this really-not-very-Green 'solution' quickly dismiss it with the "it's new of course it'll get better" remarks.

How about making it better before it gets foisted onto people.
Le Chat Guerrier

Bwian's Towel & Grief Shop

01-Dec-2020 16:22:11

Joel
Feb
fmod Member
2005

Joel

Forum Moderator Posts: 32,973 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
@Fifi, I believe my bias has been very clear throughout my posts here (at least I hope :P ) starting from my very first post and perhaps I'm a little over optimistic about this shift to EVs in general (not just Tesla's). :)

That being said, it's a direction we are going in nonetheless, I guess the question or concern is more around how we get there and how quickly we get there.

I'm not going to speak to the intentions behind individuals like Elon Musk as I can't. Obviously money is a driver for this, but is it the only driver? Maybe, maybe not. Either way, you can't argue against how he's disrupted the automaker industry, potentially for the better (we'll see what happens).

When we talk about a set deadline or goal being unachievable, I appreciate that a shift too quickly can provoke fear and anxiety. What doesn't help though is misconceptions & misinformation (not suggesting you're intentionally trying to be misleading). In an earlier post you said how this 2030 deadline (for the UK) is unachievable and unrealistic. But you made that point by citing how the UK has 38+ million vehicles. But as I pointed out, we're not talking about 38+ million vehicles in this 9/10 year timeframe, we're talking about at most, close to a 20th of that figure (around 2 million) - that's a drastically different goal.

If the goal was to shift all 38 million vehicles over to EVs by 2030 then I'd be with you 100% - that's just unrealistic in so many different ways, but that's not what is happening and that needs to be made absolutely clear.

I also agree with you that the UK needs to seriously invest in its infrastructure, that's a given and I'm sure the UK will (hopefully :P ) and obviously economic impacts from Covid is really not helping but that's not to say it can't be done, or that when we approach these deadlines set by governments that they can't be delayed if its deemed not ready which is why I've said having these deadlines aren't necessarily harmful.
Joel

Need support? Support Centre | Forum Help

01-Dec-2020 17:40:56

Joel
Feb
fmod Member
2005

Joel

Forum Moderator Posts: 32,973 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
@Nex, you're citing one state of one country that happens to be a pretty decent example for your argument with their struggles with power. This shift is not limited to one state or one country, it's a global shift. Will certain areas of the world struggle more than others or face bigger challenges? Of course.

This isn't going to be an easy or simple change. It's going to be difficult, challenging and time consuming. Is that excuse just to say "Nah, too hard, lets not do it"? I don't think so.

With advancements in technology we're making it more achievable to harness energy in more sustainable ways and what we can do today is not what we'll be able to do in 10, 20, 50 years time - in the same breath, what we do today wasn't what we were doing 10, 20, 50 years ago.

@Fifi,
In regards to making it better before it gets foisted onto people... This change isn't happening now, its set to happen within the next decade or so (as it stands) in which a lot can happen. Also, nothing is ever perfect and in terms of a product, nothing is ever perfect or close to reaching its potential in early adoption / early iterations of said product. To expect something to be as good as it can be straight out of the gate especially when dealing with new tech is not realistic. You have prototypes, early iterations of products, then they can be improved upon from there, that's not a new concept or limited to what we're talking about here.
Joel

Need support? Support Centre | Forum Help

01-Dec-2020 17:42:10

Megycal
Sep Member 2005

Megycal

Posts: 18,097 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Joel said :

Megycal said :
@ Joel. I have no problem with paying extra for features when you buy the car but I do have a HUGE problem with them being there and working when you purchase the vehicle and the manufacturer then turning them off later with an "update".

I completely agree - I'd be interested to know more details about this as taking something away isn't really acceptable. But that said, with cars able to receive over the air updates, it means they can actually introduce updates and new features over time and have the car remain more relevant and even 'get better' rather than it stuck in the time of when you bought it.


I'm sorry I can't remember all the details just that the car had heated rear seats then all of a sudden, after an "update", they no longer worked and to reactivate them would have cost more money.

I suspect that any big improvements/extra features that come with the updates will require the car owner to pay for them. I'd hope that if they're needed for safety that they will be free.

01-Dec-2020 18:34:04

Joel
Feb
fmod Member
2005

Joel

Forum Moderator Posts: 32,973 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
I have a feeling it was Tesla based on some articles I found. Because rear heated seats ship on all models and then software disabled, seems as though they first didn't disable it but later did to add them for an additional charge.

I think in that instance they should have eaten their mistake and allowed those who already had it to keep it and then once corrected, everyone else would have it as an optional cost.

Updates so far have been free, whether it has been safety improvements or new features. Who knows if it'll stay this way forever as we move further in the EV direction, much like how phone manufacturers like Apple and Samsung offer free software upgrades (to a point).
Joel

Need support? Support Centre | Forum Help

01-Dec-2020 18:55:57

NexOrigin

NexOrigin

Posts: 2,592 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Joel said :
With advancements in technology we're making it more achievable to harness energy in more sustainable ways and what we can do today is not what we'll be able to do in 10, 20, 50 years time - in the same breath, what we do today wasn't what we were doing 10, 20, 50 years ago.
"Renewable energy" such a solar panels, wind farms... they're not sustainable. They generally use more energy to create, then they will generate throughout their lifetime. How is that "sustainable"? They're using fossil fuels to produce products that will ultimately produce less energy than what it took to make them. Wind turbines generally take around 15 years for them to finally break even on price. Wind turbines generally last about 20 years.


It's funny tho... the same type of people who push for "renewable energy" are the same type of people who demand that fossil fuels be banned due to concerns over atmospheric C02... but none of them ever seem to promote companies like Carbon Engineering. You know, that Canadian company that no one has heard of that producing fuel from atmospheric carbon dioxide?

You want renewable energy? You want to lower the C02 levels in the atmosphere? Because that's what they do. And if you ban countries from producing carbon dioxide, what do you think will happen in a few years when more corporations are pulling carbon dioxide from the atmosphere?

Being environmentally friendly doesn't mean banning things that are naturally formed because you believe they have a negative impact, it means balancing things, so that things aren't too abundant, and things aren't too scarce. If putting C02 into the atmosphere is an issue, the solution is to remove the excess, not just ban people from adding more.

The idea that some people think the world can survive on wind and solar is laughable.


P.S. The Earth is literally a giant saltwater battery. It just needs to be plugged in.
I'm better than you, but that doesn't mean you're not great! :)

01-Dec-2020 19:40:41 - Last edited on 01-Dec-2020 19:43:05 by NexOrigin

NexOrigin

NexOrigin

Posts: 2,592 Adamant Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Dong U Dead said :
If electric cars are our future I feel close to every public parking spot needs a changing device.
It's an interesting proposal, but, is there a gas pump close to every public parking spot?

Dong U Dead said :
Not all homes are equipped for electric cars.
Well, technically, they are. Every EV sold has a 110v charger that you can plug into your outlet at home. However, they are slow chargers. You come home, you plug your car in overnight, and it's fully charged in the morning.

The EV charging stations you see in public are fast chargers. They're designed to charge your batteries quickly. Some of them will charge to 80% in around 15 minutes. You don't HAVE to use those chargers, they're just more convenient because of their speed. And you can buy fast chargers for your home as well. Generally they're just 220v DC inverters.


In Canada, there are over 5000 public EV charging stations. Their goal is to install enough charging stations along the Trans Canada Highway that you could literally drive across the entire country and not have to worry about finding a charging station.


I have an EV. It's a street bike (sort of lol). It's a Daymak EM2. I charge it at home. I just plug it in overnight. I didn't buy it to "save the planet" or anything like that. I literally bought it to just save money, and so I wouldn't have to worry about "not having gas" and having to find a ride to the gas station with a gas can.
I'm better than you, but that doesn't mean you're not great! :)

01-Dec-2020 20:13:34

Joel
Feb
fmod Member
2005

Joel

Forum Moderator Posts: 32,973 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
So the part of my post you quoted still stands...

Not really sure where the disagreement is here. If we're in a position in the not too distant future to be more sustainable, in whatever form that takes, great. It doesn't have to be limited to one way or another, to just be limited to solar, wind, hydro - what's wrong with a combination of solutions providing they are actually sustainable, especially more so than fossil fuels?

Trying to steer back to the original topic of discussion, I think it's totally feasible to have a solution or group of solutions to support a world in which starts to shift towards electrical vehicles that last longer and require less maintenance over your standard ICE vehicles and an infrastructure that supports the charging of them :)
Joel

Need support? Support Centre | Forum Help

01-Dec-2020 20:26:37

Joel
Feb
fmod Member
2005

Joel

Forum Moderator Posts: 32,973 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
NexOrigin said :
In Canada, there are over 5000 public EV charging stations. Their goal is to install enough charging stations along the Trans Canada Highway that you could literally drive across the entire country and not have to worry about finding a charging station.
Depending on what EV you have this is already done :) The chargers along the route are the fastest available right now as well which is awesome.

Already planning a 2021 summer road trip along the Trans-Canada from East over to the West coast :)

Hopefully it doesn't take too much time for the chargers along the route to become more universal so it can support a wider range of EVs :)
Joel

Need support? Support Centre | Forum Help

01-Dec-2020 20:30:16

FiFi LaFeles

FiFi LaFeles

Posts: 24,106 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Joel said :
@Fifi,

When we talk about a set deadline or goal being unachievable, I appreciate that a shift too quickly can provoke fear and anxiety. What doesn't help though is misconceptions & misinformation (not suggesting you're intentionally trying to be misleading). In an earlier post you said how this 2030 deadline (for the UK) is unachievable and unrealistic. But you made that point by citing how the UK has 38+ million vehicles. But as I pointed out, we're not talking about 38+ million vehicles in this 9/10 year timeframe, we're talking about at most, close to a 20th of that figure (around 2 million) - that's a drastically different goal.

If the goal was to shift all 38 million vehicles over to EVs by 2030 then I'd be with you 100% - that's just unrealistic in so many different ways, but that's not what is happening and that needs to be made absolutely clear.


I have already acknowledged and addressed this as you've already brought it up.

However further: let us assume that in 2030 the same amount of people buy a new car as last year that is 2.3 million. The bulk of these will, doubtless be EVs since to do other than this would be folly, given the Govt's stated intentions.

In the years between 2020 and 2030 other EVs will be purchased alongside ICE's, most likely rising in number the closer one gets to 2030. I think it's safe to say that's a high probability.

So by 2030 there's going to be a lot more than 2.3 million EVs wanting power, wouldn't you say?

But not a sniff of when and how these are to be powered. The UK doesn't even own it's nuclear stations, various other countries do. If you can bear the long read, treat yourself to this:

https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-t-z/united-kingdom.aspx

We are a very long way from having sufficient capacity by 2030. Check this out:
https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/news/nuclear-britain-hinkley-moorside-horizon/
Le Chat Guerrier

Bwian's Towel & Grief Shop

01-Dec-2020 21:34:35 - Last edited on 01-Dec-2020 21:36:29 by FiFi LaFeles

Quick find code: 23-24-938-66191302 Back to Top