XSlay4DeathX
said
:
NexOrigin said :
That same boy with the hole in his heart, who could die from covid, could also die from the flu. Or die from a car accident.
Some people will literally die if they are near a peanut, even just smelling one is enough to cause anaphylactic shock in some people.
Do believe that all nuts should be banned from the general public, to protect the occasional person who may have a serious nut allergy?
Or is it the responsibility of those who have such conditions to protect themselves while they are in the general public?
What is with all the "he can die from this and that and this or this and even this, so let covid 19 kill him?".....when it's preventable with safety measures Who should be taking the safety measures? The boy, who is at risk of many issues due to his condition, or the entire rest of society?
Take David Vetter for example. He spent his life living in a plastic bubble due to his severe combined immunodeficiency disorder. The rest of society didn't have to live in bubble to protect him from bacteria and viruses, he lived in the bubble, because it doesn't make sense to force the rest of society to live in a bubble to protect the minority of people who suffer from this. It's called "personal responsibility". People who are at risk should be ones taking the precautions to protect themselves. It shouldn't the responsibility of everyone else who isn't at risk to make sure that those at risk are safe.
Those who are at risk, should be wearing N95 masks.
However, there are cities that have banned the use of N95 masks in public, because they only protect the person wearing the mask from being infected, and don't filter outgoing air. The logic is that 'it doesn't protect others", when the person wearing it is trying to protect themselves because they might be in a high risk category.
You're not allowed to protect yourself, only others.
Lolgic. I'm better than you, but that doesn't mean you're not great!
NexOrigin said :
That same boy with the hole in his heart, who could die from covid, could also die from the flu. Or die from a car accident.
Some people will literally die if they are near a peanut, even just smelling one is enough to cause anaphylactic shock in some people.
Do believe that all nuts should be banned from the general public, to protect the occasional person who may have a serious nut allergy?
Or is it the responsibility of those who have such conditions to protect themselves while they are in the general public?
What is with all the "he can die from this and that and this or this and even this, so let covid 19 kill him?".....when it's preventable with safety measures Who should be taking the safety measures? The boy, who is at risk of many issues due to his condition, or the entire rest of society?
Take David Vetter for example. He spent his life living in a plastic bubble due to his severe combined immunodeficiency disorder. The rest of society didn't have to live in bubble to protect him from bacteria and viruses, he lived in the bubble, because it doesn't make sense to force the rest of society to live in a bubble to protect the minority of people who suffer from this. It's called "personal responsibility". People who are at risk should be ones taking the precautions to protect themselves. It shouldn't the responsibility of everyone else who isn't at risk to make sure that those at risk are safe.
Those who are at risk, should be wearing N95 masks.
However, there are cities that have banned the use of N95 masks in public, because they only protect the person wearing the mask from being infected, and don't filter outgoing air. The logic is that 'it doesn't protect others", when the person wearing it is trying to protect themselves because they might be in a high risk category.
You're not allowed to protect yourself, only others.
Lolgic. I'm better than you, but that doesn't mean you're not great!
16-Dec-2020 21:27:42
