FiFi LaFeles
said
:
I think Lord Sumption (has he got a brother called Con?) should, as an old fart, follow his own leanings and isolate somewhere. For the greater good of us all.
I believe Bouvet Island is nice this time of year.
Do you believe that everyone should be isolating for the good of the vulnerable? Or should those who are vulnerable be isolating? And should this isolation be voluntary? Or should it be forced upon the populations under threat?
I'm better than you, but that doesn't mean you're not great!
OK. I'm thinking out loud here and open to persuasion or question:
Given the effects on both the economy of this country and the impact of isolating on one and all I think it would make financial sense to get those of working age back working a.s.a.p.
This will address both the financial and mental health of a lot of people.
The vulnerables however (of which I am one) need to have a far greater network of support in order to actually achieve isolation than is currently available to many. If such sufficient support were available then it seems to make more sense to temporarily curtail the largely non-essential activities of the vulnerables.
I think such isolating should be voluntary - they are the ones at greatest risk and if they choose to take the risk of possibly dying ..... well, Darwinism Award time.
I think it would have cost both the country, and individuals, a great deal less if money had been spent providing a robust support system for the vulnerables and let those at far lesser risk continue to work. It becomes problematic only when these workers are closely involved with the vulnerables (Care Homes, Hospitals etc) and may be carrying the virus with them into isolating units.
This is why I've been thinking lately that vaccines should have been offered not to very elderly/ill first but rather the people who look after them, to minimise so far as is possible contaminating an area of isolation.
This would only work if we lived in an ideal world where everyone accepted being vaccinated and we had a trusted vaccine. Neither being the case.
I've never been a big fan of anyone being forced to do something, it's happening right now and the situation is becoming untenable.
You may now pick the bones out of that
Le Chat Guerrier
Bwian's Towel & Grief Shop
19-Jan-2021 03:18:57
- Last edited on
19-Jan-2021 03:20:52
by
FiFi LaFeles
FiFi LaFeles
said
:
You may now pick the bones out of that
Okay, here goes... don't be too offended... but I think I agree with most of what you said.
There should have been a lot more focus on developing and distributing rapid testing systems for regular use. If those who are vulnerable had easy access to rapid testing systems (results are known within 20 minutes) it would be fairly easy to keep most of the virus away from them. Sure, it may be an inconvenience to those who are vulnerable or those who interact with the vulnerable to have to take a 20 minute test maybe once a day, but, that's far less invasive than shutting down the whole country.
I know people who work health related environments, and they're only taking a covid test once a week, not once a day. Sure, once a week is better than nothing, but, why not once a day, if it only takes 20 minutes for the results?
I'm sure the excuse would be "there isn't enough tests for that", meanwhile they're out testing any random person who visits a testing center, regardless if they're vulnerable, or have interactions with vulnerable people. If the focus was pinpointed on those who were vulnerable, there would be no need to be testing random people in random locations all over the country, and there would be enough tests for daily testing for those who have interactions with vulnerable.
I'm better than you, but that doesn't mean you're not great!
Although I question the accuracy of many/any of the tests that have been and are currently available (certainly in the UK anyway).
There's been all manner of reports, spurious or otherwise, that the various tests and ways of testing are not only costly but horribly inaccurate.
Still, as you say, if money had been thrown at developing a fast and mainly accurate test kit much earlier in this game, it would have benefitted people worldwide.
Sadly, countries are notoriously poor at sharing. Everyone working on different versions of different tests. Contracts for worthless crap, costing untold Millions, being handed to Old School Chums with bugger all expertise in any field, scientists going off down various routes for various vaccines ...... you'd think for once we might just have been able to all pull together.
And on that note of tiredness and extreme grouchiness I think I'll go to bed!
We'd originally expected to see some lifting of Lockdown restrictions here (UK) by mid-end February - as indicated in earlier reports from our Govt.
However, media sources are now saying that we'll be remaining in Lockdown until Easter (April).
Not surprising really, apparently we have the highest per capita Covid daily death rate in the World * with 1,600 in one day as of a couple of days ago.
Whatever it is we're doing - we're clearly doing it very, very inadequately.
* Depending on what set of figures you look at - no one can seem to agree even on that
Le Chat Guerrier
Bwian's Towel & Grief Shop
20-Jan-2021 12:45:41
- Last edited on
20-Jan-2021 12:53:52
by
FiFi LaFeles
Lockdown: Police officers fined £200 for cafe meeting.
Thats what I like to see. Police getting fined and not getting away with it. If it had been any of us we would have been fined a lot more.
Comprehensive Account Security
What do snowmen have for breakfast? Snowflakes!
20-Jan-2021 14:03:50
- Last edited on
20-Jan-2021 14:44:08
by
Tuffty
1News: British woman who lived through 1918 flu pandemic marks 105th birthday after Covid-19 recovery.
https://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/world/british-woman-lived-through-1918-flu-pandemic-marks-105th-birthday-after-covid-19-recovery
The problem of leaving it up to the individual to choose if they should or shouldn't isolate sounds good; I don't actually think it would work. Majority of people need money, not sure of the numbers, I feel most would choose to work over isolation due to many reasons one being hardship. Also you will get some bosses making people work, giving them an alternation, not sure how many people would report this if it's made illegal in these times. Covid would still spread like wildfire as you have people with families of different health elements. And our hospital ms will get over run which puts pressure on the whole hospital, which leads to more deaths including deaths outside of Covid.
The 1918 flu pandemic killed an estimated 50 million worldwide, including nearly 675,000 Americans, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
To date, more than 95.6 million people have been infected with COVID-19 worldwide. More than 2 million have died, including at least 400,000 Americans, according to real-time data compiled by Johns Hopkins University:
ABC News: Photos: How the 1918 and COVID pandemics compare.
https://abcnews.go.com/International/comparing-contrasting-coronavirus-1918-flu-pandemics-images/story?id=71971264