Forums

== Quests in the Making V3 ==

Quick find code: 16-17-277-66108056

Dilbert2001
Jun Member 2006

Dilbert2001

Posts: 30,176 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
yammaniow said :
Deltaslug said :
Quests that involve combat are often an exception to the rule where having a higher level could be more useful than the stats listed to start/do the quest.
Skilled players have beaten bosses while only have 1 Defence or 10 HP or just low combat stats in general (I'm not suggesting they used a Deathtouch Dart, but some have).

But having higher stats does sometimes make quest boss fights a little easier.


I would like to say isn’t it about time we had a combat OR player unique puzzle to finish a quest, some players, like me to a degree , have varying amounts of multitasking (combat style swapping) or reaction times for various reasons.

I for one would welcome such a quest outcome, maybe it could be weighted more reward wise for those who choose combat, just a thought


Didn't we already have no bosses fight in the last 2 quests - Once Upon a Slime and Desperate Times?

19-Jun-2020 15:49:49

Miu

Miu

Posts: 16,955 Opal Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
RS3 is in a pathetic state of quests.

OSRS has outshone RS3's own questlines, even. Song of the Elves far surpasses the rushed Plague's End quest. It even features a very deranged fragment of seren as a boss, which was a lot more intense than the ent-like darklord from RS3. Elena isn't forgotten, either, and she even says as much during the quest.

The followup quests in OSRS's Myreque storyline continue the theme of enhancing the ivandis rod, instead of outright discarding it for the blisterwood items. At first I was skeptical of the Theatre of Blood, but the lore weaves in perfectly with Drakan's preferred taste of blood, those filled with hope. Looking forward to see where it continues.

RS3 has really dropped the ball on every finale, so it kind of makes sense why they'd stop making quests. OSRS just needs to finish up the Slug Menace series, maybe they can find a better conclusion than a pillar! And maybe introduce armor better than proselyte!
Don't forget – RuneScape members get TWO free spins a day instead of the usual one!

29-Jun-2020 00:52:46

Dilbert2001
Jun Member 2006

Dilbert2001

Posts: 30,176 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Miu said :
RS3 is in a pathetic state of quests.

OSRS has outshone RS3's own questlines, even. Song of the Elves far surpasses the rushed Plague's End quest. It even features a very deranged fragment of seren as a boss, which was a lot more intense than the ent-like darklord from RS3. Elena isn't forgotten, either, and she even says as much during the quest.

The followup quests in OSRS's Myreque storyline continue the theme of enhancing the ivandis rod, instead of outright discarding it for the blisterwood items. At first I was skeptical of the Theatre of Blood, but the lore weaves in perfectly with Drakan's preferred taste of blood, those filled with hope. Looking forward to see where it continues.

RS3 has really dropped the ball on every finale, so it kind of makes sense why they'd stop making quests. OSRS just needs to finish up the Slug Menace series, maybe they can find a better conclusion than a pillar! And maybe introduce armor better than proselyte!


ROFL!!! Sins of the Father is just a carbon copy of
half of
Branches of Darkmeyer. If you have done Branches of the Darkmeyer, you should have known it easily.... next up is Safalaan is going to be turned into a wyrd and fight the World Guardian, then his mother comes to save him.

Realistically, Sins is the Father doesn't impress me at all with its story by copying everything 100% from RS3. OSRS should really put some creative efforts into their quests and lore based content.

29-Jun-2020 02:08:58

Fat N Wacky
Aug Member 2013

Fat N Wacky

Posts: 5,563 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Miu said :
Snip


While I agree that RS3's quest release schedule is in an extremely sorry state; You have to remember that OSRS has two enormous advantages over RS3: One is that development time is much, much shorter, and the other is that OSRS has the benefit of being able to learn from RS3's mistakes. If the stuff OSRS does that RS3 did before it doesn't fix some of the issues that RS3's version of that stuff has, then, frankly and bluntly, they're doing life wrong. You're supposed to learn from mistakes, both others' and your own.

Yes, RS3's quest release schedule is abysmal and needs colossal improvement, but even if that weren't the case, comparing it to OSRS it will still inevitably fall short because it has an inherent disadvantage.

Dilbert2001 said :
ROFL!!!


Please be civil.

Dilbert2001 said :
Snip


RS3 and OSRS share an identical near 7 years' worth of updates, and therefore quests, foreshadowing, buildup, and so on and so forth, before they each veered off in their own directions (RS3 for a further 13 years, OSRS for a further 7). It makes an awful lot of sense, then, for RS3 and OSRS to continue to share some plot points even after the fork from 2007 RS2. You're somehow evaluating that as proof that OSRS is in this way bad; That makes absolutely zero sense. Of course Sins of the Father has a lot in common with The Branches of Darkmeyer, they're different continuations of the same storyline . Have you ever seen Fullmetal Alchemist, and Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood? They share a virtually identical beginning, and then their plots split and head in different, albeit eerily similar directions. Does the simple fact that their distinct conclusions still manage to share some eerie similarities inherently make one of the stories lower quality?? No! That's preposterous!
The best things in life are h i dden. You have to seek them out! :D

30-Jun-2020 03:02:21 - Last edited on 30-Jun-2020 03:03:05 by Fat N Wacky

Dilbert2001
Jun Member 2006

Dilbert2001

Posts: 30,176 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
@Fat N Wacky

Sins of the Father didn't branch off from Branches of Darkmeyer. Sins of the Father is exactly the first half of Branches of Darkmeyer. It skipped the 2nd half of Branches of Darkmeyer where the player interact with different tiers of vamplyres, but the whole story is just deja vu to those who have completed Branches of Darkmeyer.

On the other hand, Song of the Elves did branch off from Plague's End. The conclusion is distinct since we didn't get to the Fragment of Seren part much later in RS3.

As for your comment "RS3's quest release schedule is abysmal and needs colossal improvement", OSRS is equally, if not more, abysmal and needs colossal improvement too. Don't you notice OSRS is not releasing more quests than RS3. They released only half the numbers of quests as RS3 counting from its first day, and it certainly is not releasing more quests than RS3 now. The fact is It takes too much time to develop one-off content like quests and Jagex (note: Jagex, not just RS3) is reluctant to spend too much time on quests The same problem holds for both RS3 and OSRS

RS3 has 37 new quests released since Aug 23, 2013 where OSRS only has 17 quests added since its first day. The truth is out there:

https://runescape.wiki/w/List_of_quests_by_release_date
https://oldschool.runescape.wiki/w/Quests/Release_dates

Those who complained about lack of quests in RS3 but insist OSRS have more just need to be frank and civil. OSRS never even released quests in its first couple of years. It was a colossal long drought and players didn't have any problem at all, and now both games are releasing 2 to 4 quests a year and RS3 is abysmal and OSRS is great? Curious mind want to know why?

30-Jun-2020 03:48:41 - Last edited on 30-Jun-2020 04:13:18 by Dilbert2001

Fat N Wacky
Aug Member 2013

Fat N Wacky

Posts: 5,563 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Dilbert2001 said :
Snip


Of course if you count from OSRS' release date, RS3 has released more quests. OSRS didn't release quests for years because it was still finding itself, finding its groove. OSRS was unsure if it was going to release content of its own of a large or significant size. Since its begun to, not one year has gone by where RS3 has released more quests than OSRS. 2017 was the first full year OSRS was releasing quests; that year it came out with 6. That year, RS3 had the same amount. 2018, both games released the same amount of new quests again. In 2019, however, OSRS released 5 new quests, and RS3 only 3. As far as 2020, it's only half done so far, but RS3's plan is 2 total quests, with the possibility of a third. IDK what OSRS' plan is, but if you really care about 2020 let's come back at the end of the year and do a proper comparison.

OSRS either ties or wins out against RS3 on its quest release schedule. It may not be phenomenal, but it's indisputably better.

That conclusion even sticks if you do count from OSRS' release, because a proper count is objective. In other words, how far has the game in question come? OSRS started out by releasing 0 quests a year, and since has improved to between 4 and 6 quests a year. That's an indisputably upwards trend. Compare that to RS3's: 2013 had 6. 2014 had 7. 2015 had 7. 2016 had 7. 2017 had 6. 2018 had 4. 2019 had 3. 2020 will have 2, or maximum, 3. That's an indisputably downwards trend.

Exactly how is OSRS' release schedule worse? Your comment makes no sense at all.

Dilbert2001 said :
...and RS3 is abysmal and OSRS is great?
That's a strawman fallacy. I never said OSRS' quest release schedule is "great," I only ever said that RS3's was abysmal, and that RS3's quest release schedule is inferior to OSRS'. Both of which are indisputable facts. I did not speak objectively to OSRS' quest release schedule.
The best things in life are h i dden. You have to seek them out! :D

08-Jul-2020 02:31:22

Dilbert2001
Jun Member 2006

Dilbert2001

Posts: 30,176 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
@Fat N Wacky

"OSRS was unsure if it was going to release content of its own of a large or significant size"


So was RS3 unsure if it was going to release content of a large or significant size. Note that their plans changed. Just today, they announced the new Monthly Cadence plan which changed both the sizes of the releases and their schedule. Why was it OK for OSRS to hold off releasing certain content including quests for years but it is not the case in RS3?

Read OSRS's Runefest reveal if you haven't, only one quest, Sins of the Father, was scheduled the entire year. Read OSRS's June Gazette too, another quest was mentioned but it is clearly said they won't starting looking at it before the completion of the 2nd League. OSRS is highly likely going to have one quest the entire year of 2020, or at most 2 if they are extremely lucky. Don't tell us it is not a drought.

Please note that I didn't start comparing OSRS quests to RS3. I didn't intend to do that at all. Please check the comments you replied to. Miu started all these nonsense and you jumped in. Don't tell us OSRS's quest release schedule is better than RS3. It is crystal clear OSRS won't have more quests this year than RS3 because the most they schedule to have is 2 quests but realistically most likely be just 1 while RS3 will have at least 2 and likely 3 or more.

08-Jul-2020 03:32:06

Fat N Wacky
Aug Member 2013

Fat N Wacky

Posts: 5,563 Rune Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Dilbert2001 said :
RS3 will have at least 2 and likely 3 or more.


Your bias is showing; There is 0 indication that RS3 could have more than 3 quests released this year. The count is two, and a possible third, according to the stream. That does not equate to "likely 3 or more."

Have a good day, and happy 'scaping.
The best things in life are h i dden. You have to seek them out! :D

09-Jul-2020 00:57:12

Dilbert2001
Jun Member 2006

Dilbert2001

Posts: 30,176 Sapphire Posts by user Forum Profile RuneMetrics Profile
Fat N Wacky said :
Dilbert2001 said :
RS3 will have at least 2 and likely 3 or more.


Your bias is showing; There is 0 indication that RS3 could have more than 3 quests released this year. The count is two, and a possible third, according to the stream. That does not equate to "likely 3 or more."

Have a good day, and happy 'scaping.


How is that my bias when OSRS clearly won't have more than 2 quests this year and therefore at least, if not more abysmal than RS3 in quests? It is crystal clear OSRS is also reducing the number of quests and don't even try to use the stupid excuse that they aren't sure they need quests like in 2013. :D

The March and June OSRS Gielinor Gazette shows us what is killing OSRS quests clearly:

Form the March Gazette:

"A Kingdom Divided:
The next quest in the Kourend series is planned for release later this year
. It's still a long way until launch, and current work is design focused. Mod Ed is fleshing out the narrative design while Mod West is looking at the main quest rewards and new spells for the Arceuus spellbook."


However, the June Gazette, the planned release date is totally omitted and they added clearly there is currently no new progress at all and won't be until the 2nd League has been launched:

"A Kingdom Divided: As with last month,
there's no new progress to report on A Kingdom Divided right now. Work isn't set to begin on the project until after the second League has been launched.
For anyone not aware, A Kingdom Divided is the next quest in the Kourend storyline and it is set to offer some new Arceuus spells as a reward."


Even strawmen know quests in OSRS are giving way to Easyscape events. OSRS players just need to accept the obvious drought in OSRS quests while enjoying the game's transformation into Easysape and Eventscape.

09-Jul-2020 02:52:01

Quick find code: 16-17-277-66108056 Back to Top