I think OP should give us more specifics on the "OSRS dead content" so we may see how we may help Jagex to make their games better.
For instance, if OP thinks the OSRS Vorkath is dead content, then tell us why do they think it is "dead content"? Bad graphics, lack of stories, garbage cookie cutter hit and run mechanics and nothing else? If so, then we should go for the opinions of the OSRS community as the RS3 players can't change a thing in the OSRS they don't want to play.
On the other hand, if OP thinks the RS3 Vorkath is dead content just because they play OSRS and dislkie the OSRS Vorkath, and are preoccupied with the bad experience in that game, I strongly urge them to delve deeper into all the stories related to Necromancy, Fort Forinthry and Zemouregal that OSRS lacks totally. RS3 content comes with a whole package of stories, new skills, new combat and new game play that OSRS players may have missed.
In general, if OSRS players come to RS3 and see the same NPC or the remastered quests like Rune Mysteries they have in OSRS, perhaps treat RS3 as a new game and go through the stories and such will make them feel very different than the dead content in OSRS.
Another example is both games have Duke Sucellus but OSRS's Duke among other DT2 bosses have almost no lore other than they were old minions of Zaros. Most OSRS players aren't thrilled with the lack of rewards and same old combat mechanics, but don't get preoccupied with OSRS as Duke and the Zarosian empire content are very enjoyable, immersive and rewarding when we step through quests and Archaeology mysteries like Broken Home and the Karid-et Mysteries in RS3.
12-Dec-2023 17:24:40
- Last edited on
12-Dec-2023 17:55:24
by
Dilbert2001