Fully agree with Astra's points as well. Allies def should serve a purpose other than just being listed on each others forums and the occasional event together. This would def enhance the political side of POCs and maybe even bring more interest to the warring aspect for the smaller clans.
The Silver G
said
:
=+= Land Claim =+=
Clan: Kharyrllian Wolfpack
Land: Harmony
Access to Land: The ocean, ports, boats, waterskiing, tubing, ride a shark etc.
Accepted. Updating resources for everyone now.
Cain Izrail |
EDIT: Additionally, resource revenues for every POC have been added to page 4, so now it should be clear exactly how many of each resource you will be getting!
Please let me know if there are any errors on it.
Cain Izrail |
Thanks for the feedback and criticisms! I'm happy to see that everyone is concerned about this.
Golf: In theory, what you are suggesting is a good idea, but I worry that clan size is not an effective way to predict the pull of a clan for warring. Allowing up to 5 members from an ally by default for
both
sides would simplify the system (and give me less work updating the thread, which I am always a fan of), but it would also hurt clans who choose to have no allies. If people want to move in that direction, it would encourage more POC cooperation.
3randon: I am for upping the cost of the beacons in terms of the raw resources (wood, ore, fish, flax) and reducing the costs on runes and energy. We could do 25W/O/X/F and 5 E/R. I also like the idea of further restricting the allied pull to no more than the pull of the opposing clan, max 5.
When a beacon is lit, any allied clan may answer the call (max 1 clan). If no one answers, well, yeah, you need better allies. Welcome to the cutthroat politics of POCs.
Jor: If we were able to implement your idea efficiently, then this would help solve this issue in a creative and immersive way. If an ally has a "small" army (say of size 5) in the proximity of the warring area, then they would be able to send it to reinforce their allies. My main concern is that people are not going to want to worry about where their armies are placed.
Cain Izrail |
At this stage i feel the vote should be put on hold until certain amendments are made to help balance the proposed system and to where it cannot be abused / exploited. So for now LAK will pull its vote for the time being.