Trips
said
:
Utmost
said
:
And no, your name is deemed inappropriate for the fc, so you won't be getting off.
Nex to Zappy would be more suitable heh.
Well i'll be changing my name again shortly
Had name to match a friend then changed it 2 days ago, although reading over the offensive name rules it's not really offensive alluding to a vulgar word.
14-Nov-2015 01:27:57
- Last edited on
14-Nov-2015 01:32:32
by
Trolls
Trips
said
:
So what, everyday at the reset it gets updated with new trades?
I feel like this will be quit tedious over time as the current ranks become less active and new ones won't care. It may work for a few months but I think eventually it'll be updated every few days, then back to every ~10 new trades
Even if ranks fail to update the prices 3 days in a row, it'd still be better than current system; that's what I was thinking
.
You're right though, the option depends a too much on ranks' diligence. I'm sure you admins will think this over
.
7/
27
120s
||
3/
27
200m's
No longer playing.
14-Nov-2015 04:25:22
- Last edited on
14-Nov-2015 04:26:19
by
Elf Mathews
Trips
said
:
Sorry, was going to say something but it seemed too logical to make any sense...
This actually sounds a little too elitist and adds meaning to Dardads claims, i have watched Dardads posts for some time and maybe at 1st he was a little over the top and went on a bit but he has mellowed and acted proper for quite a few months now and it just seems like some people still try to mock him and try to get him to turn into the person that "they" think he is, but from watching him and his continuation of trying to "in some way" clear his name i can understand why he does this and know full well that when someone knows they are correct it is hard to let go, i know this because of personal reasons.
[qfc id=]whatever[/qfc]
Was it logical in the same sense that it was logical to de-rank the fc's most active member (arguably anyway) without warning and without giving them a chance to give their side of the story?
Was it logical in the same sense that despite that rank being kicked from the fc and being personally attacked in the cc by an admin immediately after that admin intercepted a letter by the rank to the fc owner (as witnessed by you, the cc owner and the fc founder), the blame was placed on that rank?
Was it logical in the same sense that the rank was the one kicked from the cc during that and subsequent attacks by the admin and other ranks although all they attempted to do was to defend their self?
Was it logical in the same sense that it was ignored that the admin stated in the cc that they felt the rank was trying to get them de-ranked and instead was going to get said rank de-ranked?
Was it logical in the same sense that this rank tried for weeks to try to get the admin team to at least listen to their side of the story and then was labeled a troll for finally posting their side of the story here out of exasperation?
Was it logical in the same sense that all posts here supporting that rank were deleted but those attacking the rank were not?
If that's the type of logic involved, then yeah, it's best to keep it to yourself.
Edit: Editorial/clarity re-write
14-Nov-2015 20:42:33
- Last edited on
14-Nov-2015 21:43:11
by
465798359gjk
Scouse
said
:
Trips
said
:
Sorry, was going to say something but it seemed too logical to make any sense...
This actually sounds a little too elitist and adds meaning to Dardads claims, i have watched Dardads posts for some time and maybe at 1st he was a little over the top and went on a bit but he has mellowed and acted proper for quite a few months now and it just seems like some people still try to mock him and try to get him to turn into the person that "they" think he is, but from watching him and his continuation of trying to "in some way" clear his name i can understand why he does this and know full well that when someone knows they are correct it is hard to let go, i know this because of personal reasons.
Unfortunately this is not what was meant by my statement. I intended to give reasoning both for and against the actions taken in the past, but I knew that only one side of my statement would be quoted and turned against me regarding the fairness of the situation. People often forget to realize that there needs to be 2 independent clauses for any argument or fight.
Dardad, if we could have a chat sometime (today, or whenever) and discuss your situation we can hopefully find a solution that suits everyone.
Join "Pis2ols" FC for all discontinued item price checks.
S z
said
:
Sea King
said
:
You can get KOS for just providing evidence of some ranks maniping. They tell you to report to admins, but nothing ever happens: those ranks who are guilty of maniping just get a warning and those who report them get KOS. I even screenshotted the official reason by admin for me getting KOS: for accusing some ranks of maniping.
Hi, reason for KOS is
"consistently derailing fc, going off-topic and causing disturbances - many warnings and extra chances"
. The accusation you specifically mention was appreciated and taken seriously. However, after investigation it was decided that there wasn't any substance to the claim. Any additional information is also welcome, I have my PM on most of the time, so feel free to contact me
. But making the accusation is not the reason for your status in the friends chat
Thank you for setting the record straight.
I also have dozens of screenshots of him deliberately posting to derail status thread. PM me if you need any evidence. I am also willing to show any FMODs as well.